Yeah, I like the idea of the tea party.
But I'm surprised that you do. After all, they oppose many republican candidates.
in the primary
Yeah, I like the idea of the tea party.
But I'm surprised that you do. After all, they oppose many republican candidates.
No, I don't. Just because someone is a liar and a fool doesn't mean that I have to hate them. I also lie, and I also am a fool. That doesn't mean I can't recognize the condition in others. And it doesn't mean I can't point it out.Wow, you really hate those people don't you?
Wow, you really hate those people don't you? :doh:
Yet when we do the same (i.e, point out that liberals are liars and fools) you consider that hate. :idunno:No, I don't. Just because someone is a liar and a fool doesn't mean that I have to hate them. I also lie, and I also am a fool. That doesn't mean I can't recognize the condition in others. And it doesn't mean I can't point it out.
It wasn't that clever of me. Your post was so stupid, it was the obvious response.Very clever of you to turn the tables on me like that, though. We sure haven't seen that tactic used on here ten thousand times, before.
:think: Interesting. I'm optimistic and that seems, historically, realistic to me as well. I guess it's the old glass half full/what the heck is that in the glass anyway distinction.All the failures of even the best forms of government are meant to teach us that our hopes shouldn't be set on a restoration of this, or any other, country. It should be set on the restoration of man. I think about the Apostle Paul operating for all those years within the confines of the pagan Roman Empire, with all of its moral depravity, and never once did he complain about the government. Augustine's City of God helped me quite a bit on this subject.
Is this all too cynical? Maybe. I think I'm being realistic.
:think: Interesting. I'm optimistic and that seems, historically, realistic to me as well. I guess it's the old glass half full/what the heck is that in the glass anyway distinction.
It's not so much that I'm saying that all is lost. I look at history, and I see that all of the great "lights" of the world throughout history have come and gone. Sure, some last longer than others, but they all fade given enough time and the right set of circumstances. Recently, I've been teaching the fall of the Roman Empire, and many of the same problems that plagued that empire are plaguing us here. Toynebee once wrote that "Civilizations die from suicide, not murder." It just seems to be the way of things.
And advanced the greater good, if incrementally, setting the stage for the next attempt...but we have a new mechanism in play, a means to peaceful revolution and reinvention. I don't think history quite knows what to do with that.It's not so much that I'm saying that all is lost. I look at history, and I see that all of the great "lights" of the world throughout history have come and gone.
Invictus.Toynebee once wrote that "Civilizations die from suicide, not murder." It just seems to be the way of things.
Sure. And He seemed remarkably invested in how we treat one another. So I'd say our investment in advancing the good, for as long as we can up to and including the indefinite is on message, no?But, in the end, I find that my citizenship lies elsewhere (Philippians 3:20). Does that mean I abandon this world and its inhabitants to its own destructive devices? No. In fact, I think this allows me to say and do what I think is right and true and good. You've seen the movie The Dark Knight. I actually think that is one of the more subtle messages of the movie. It is only the one who above "the law" (who is bound by a greater Law) that can do the things that must be done.
I didn't say anything about liberals or conservatives in my post. I was only speaking of those who seem to think that it's their duty to force everyone else to comply with their ideas about how things should be. They spout off about patriotism, but in reality they don't understand America at all. They don't understand that this is a nation based on pluralism. A nation of different people from different places with different traditions and different desires and different ideologies, who become one nation not because they all agree, but because they can agree to disagree; because they can respect each other's differences, and even learn from them.Yet when we do the same (i.e, point out that liberals are liars and fools) you consider that hate.
... those who seem to think that it's their duty to force everyone else to comply with their ideas about how things should be.
I just take it in stride. I'm too much of an optimist to let it depress me. The truth seems to be that they'll never be a time where we have what I think the majority would like: a conservatively fiscal, socially liberal environment in this country. So I try not to think about it much. You have two core bases in both parties that want everything.
We can financially manage the country but everyone has to follow our moral compass or you can have all the liberty you want but we are going to spend like crazy on most likely fruitless progressive ideas. Just manage the country responsibly and give us liberty.
I'm glad you're an optimist, Quincy.
I wouldn't be surprised if the quiet majority in the USA turned out to have pretty much the same angle as you.