Whatever you link to. If you present racism here, don't be surprised if people conclude you're a racist.
Is the author of the article a racist, too?
He's trying to play the race card against Obama. Is it possible he really doesn't hate black people, and is just using it to get to Obama? Sure. Do you think that's better?
Do you call everyone you disagree with a racists?
The Duck test applies here. If you don't want to be taken for one, don't quack.
You walk about town, someone bumps into you on the sidewalk--racist! Your driving in your car, someone cuts you off--racist!
That's the kind of dishonesty I'm talking about. Not everything offensive is racist. You want to somehow twist that fact into the idea that nothing is racism.
few housekeeping items:
I do not agree with all authors that I link to.
Make it clear each time you don't, or we'll assume you endorse the view you presented.
Barbarian chuckles:
"If you don't want to be considered a racist, don't act like one. Trotting out your racist stuff about Darwin was a huge mistake."
Silence the critic?
I am not the author of the book but I have read it and I do agree that your monkey theory helped to popularize racism.
Doesn't matter. As you see, Darwin opposed rating people by race, and your fellow creationists are still blathering about the supposed inferiority of blacks. Creationists should be very quiet when the subject of racism comes up. At least until you get your own house in order.
“Although racism did not begin with Darwinism, Darwin did more than any person to popularize it.” - from Darwin’s Plantation
I know you want us to believe so, but Henry Morris was the leader of American creationists, and as late as 1992, was still peddling the idea that God made blacks intellectually and spiritually inferior to other people. And none of you cared enough to criticize him, much less remove him from leadership.
Serpent asks:
Would you like to know my opinion about Obama's campaign staff?
Barbarian chuckles:
No one cares, Serpent.
We don't care what Fidel Castro thinks about capitalism, either. For the same reason.
Your tactic is: call someone a name (sixhirb: sexist, intolerant, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist, bigot [Prager]) so that you can dismiss them and their argument.
Serpent, you just tried that tactic with Darwin. And it blew up in your face. Peddle your racist fantasies here if you like. But don't whine if people draw conclusions from your behavior.
Barbarian observes:
You can't stand the idea that someone of African descent was elected president."
Your habit of linking to racist sites (and then trying to back away from responsibility for it) pretty much settles that.
Barbarian observes:
If you don't want people drawing conclusions from your behavior then improve your behavior.
Or else what? It's simple; you are accountable for what you do here. Act accordingly.
(Serpent tries a little misrepresentation)
Aren't you the one that believes we came from special monkeys that descended from the trees and used tools
Barbarian replies:
No.
No, you no longer believe your monkey theory or yes, you still believe your monkey theory?
No, I don't believe your silly misrepresentation of science.
You've been at TOL for a while but you still do not have a biblical worldview.
Serpent, you and a Biblical wordview don't share the same zipcode.
Serpent asks:
Do you believe in a physical, literal, bodily resurrection of Jesus?"]
Barbarian replies:
I think you're wrong about that.
Christ was clearly present physically when He spoke to His disciples after the resurrection. You can't have him eating, drinking, and having Thomas check out stigmata without having Him there physically.
Think.
Is it dishonesty or disagreement?
It's your dishonesty. A good example is above. You edited something I wrote earlier to make it appear I didn't believe in the Resurrection. (I replaced the text you removed, in red) That's the reputation you have here, Serpent. I don't know whether you're just pretending to be a Christian, or whether you think deception is a good way to serve God. But it hurts you.
You removed the scripture from my quote. I had asked: Do you finally believe that God did what he said he did (Ge 1:1, 1:26).
The issue is, you don't approve of the way He did it.
Creation took place in six normal days (Ex 20:11; 31:17).
Even ancient Christians knew that was not true, and Genesis does not say six normal days.
God created man in his own image (Ge 1:26,27; 1Co 11:7) and likeness (Ge 1:26; Jas 3:9) from the beginning (Ge 1:1; Mt 24:21, Mk 10:6).
The "likeness" is in His mind and spirit. As Jesus says, God is a spirit and a spirit has no body.
You've just rearranged the Bible to make it more acceptable to you.