Just wait a few years. :idunno:Absolutely prove to me that god is real and the problem will correct itself.
Just wait a few years. :idunno:Absolutely prove to me that god is real and the problem will correct itself.
Absolutely prove to me that god is real and the problem will correct itself.
Which actually s the major point for this topic. Without proof of the existence of God, there is no logical argument against homosexuality outside of religion.
Sure there is, don't you know that all gays are sex crazed meth addicts with AIDS?
No. Fallen man is subject and predisposed to all manner of corruption, genetics notwithstanding.
"My genes made me do it" will never be a suitable defense.
AMR
The TheologyOnline.com TOPIC OF THE DAY for September 16th, 2011 10:12 AM
toldailytopic: Does your opinion about homosexuality change if the behavior turns out to be genetic?
Sure there is, don't you know that all gays are sex crazed meth addicts with AIDS?
“A man who has an argument is always at the mercy of a man who has an experience”No ... I think I would remember seeing those statistics. :think:
Killing someone because of their genes is never defensible, either.
Nope. I believe it largely is genetic anyway, but if and when this is finally proven, it won't make me re-think the matter.
If only Jeffrey Dahmer had a lawyer that knew about the "genetic" defense, he would still be alive today.
Which actually is the major point for this topic. Without proof of the existence of God, there is no logical argument against homosexuality outside of religion.
That has absolutely nothing to do with what I just said.
"Act only upon that maxim which you at the same time could will to become a universal law."
"Act so as to treat humanity always at the same time as an end in itself, never merely as a means to an end."
"Act always as though you were a law-making member of a kingdom of ends."
Bonus points if anyone knows what I'm quoting.
Looks like your argument fails in light of Persephone66's experience.
A person's genes determine whether someone is a shegetz or not.
No. Fallen man is subject and predisposed to all manner of corruption, genetics notwithstanding.
"My genes made me do it" will never be a suitable defense.
AMR
"Act only upon that maxim which you at the same time could will to become a universal law."
"Act so as to treat humanity always at the same time as an end in itself, never merely as a means to an end."
"Act always as though you were a law-making member of a kingdom of ends."
Bonus points if anyone knows what I'm quoting.
Depends on how you're using that particular word, don'tcha think? (Remember, my mom's family is Jewish.) And frankly that goes for the rest of your post.
Killing someone because of who and what they are at birth is indefensible. And considering the ethnic angle you're taking here, this should be incredibly obvious to you.