Hello CM,
Yes, of course let's re-evaluate but please do so for me here too. It is specifically this that has us troubled over Open View propositions so I too welcome the dialogue. Neither of us want those implications sticking in our mind, but it is indeed this that is so troubling. In actuality, you are portraying my thoughts on this as well - that God can propose two (or more) sets of consequences for any given action. I absolutely see a difference between a conditional and unconditional promise as well.
For instance, I'm not double-minded if I say "clean your room, then we'll go out for ice cream." It is fairly clear, regardless that we disagree on what God knows about such beforehand, this is important discussion for what we need to agree on: specifically, that you aren't seeing me as 'repenting' in a fashion that would lead toward a double-mindedness. If my kids do not clean their room yet I take them out for ice cream, I've presented a double-standard: that they don't have to do what I tell them. It may very well be my intention to teach them about grace and mercy in that, but it wouldn't be a 'change of mind' but rather a clear indication of where my mind is at all along on such things.
The more consistent I am as a parent, that is, the more my kids understand my consistencies rather than where I'm unpredictable because of my frequent mind-changes, the better I will effectively relate to my children.
God too is very concerned with His own "Yes" and "No's" in consistency. So much so, in fact, that He instructs very clearly that we don't break promises or oaths, but that we simply say what we mean and mean what we say. It is specifically, God's integrity and trustworthiness that resists the Open View notion here of God randomly and inconsistently giving in to a whim. Rather, we believe His character, even if He doesn't have EDF, is such that we can bank on Him. That a change of mind isn't really what we are talking about, but rather a singular mind on specific issues that we can trust and consistently bank on, no matter what. For that reason specifically, it is most efficient to say rather than 'changing His mind' that God is predictably dependable and consistent against sin and in Grace and Mercy and will never change His mind about these things.
What specifically does the Open Theist desire and/or try to convey when they portray God as 'changing His mind?' What comfort is such intending to give to an individual and how isn't a God who is consistent and predictable (trustworthy) not as much, let alone more of a comfort for the Open Theist?
Thanks Randy.
In Him,
Lon