The Case for Mary’s Perpetual Virginity
By Tim Staples
Source: The Case for Mary's Perpetual Virginity
(Quoted with permission)
........I just have to remind all people who read this post that Gal 3:28 says that their are NEVER and CANNOT BE OR NEITHER BE FEMALES in Heaven OR in the BODY OF CHRIST !!.....
There you go ladies and germs, Dan P says that no females can be part of the Body of Christ.
wow
You're incapable of understanding what he's saying, which is only what Paul said. Why don't you ask Dan to clarify it for you.
Nihilo;4764532]I've never heard of that. Literally never. And I am very well read in Protestant theology.
No one does that.
Given the Protestant disregard for the Apostles, it makes sense for Protestants to disregard also Mary.
Shrug.
Shut up, you and your lies. Adults are trying to talk...........Roman Catholics in their lies, deceptions, and errors.....
There you go ladies and germs, Dan P says that no females can be part of the Body of Christ.
wow
Hi and WOWWWWWWWWWWWW Gal 3:28 says that when the body is complete , There CANNOT be Jews , Greeks , Free born , no slave NOR MALES NOR FEMALES as in the B O C all will be a NEW MAN do you all have that , A NEW MAN NOT a NEW WOMAN as written in Eph 2:15 !!
dan p
You're drunk. All Christians are adopted sons and daughters of the Father, and hence are all part of the Body of Christ. Go sober up.
You remain clueless of what adoption is referring to......
The Case for Mary’s Perpetual Virginity
By Tim Staples
Source: The Case for Mary's Perpetual Virginity
(Quoted with permission)
Joseph and Mary had other children.......
No they didn't. That fallacy has been disproven long ago.
No they didn't. That fallacy has been disproven long ago.
Yes, the RC has disproved that to themselves, but not to those who actually read the scriptures and believe God's testimonies