musterion
Well-known member
Man I can't think of a better way to explain it to ya.
But I'll try.
It is in the subjunctive mood because the phrase, standing alone, does not convey the condition/stipulation.
Only the additional info following the subjunctive gives the condition/stipulation.
To use some examples you gave earlier .... (and I will color code them)Might you eat some spinach?In the first one - no additional info (condition/stipulation) is given, so the possibilities of what will happen when/if you eat spinach are left open.
Were I to eat spinach, I would get sick.
Should I get sick, I would not be able to go to work.
If you were unable to go to work, you would not be paid.
Might get sick and might not.
Standing alone, the phrase is left wide open as to the possibilities.
In the next 3, additional info follows the subjunctive so it now has a condition/stipulation and is no longer left wide open as to the possibilities.
Were I to eat spinach, [if left alone, this phrase has no condition and is left wide open for possibilities] I would get sick. [this additional info does give a condition and therefore modifies the red subjunctive phrase]
The green additional info modifies the uncertainty of the red phrase.
Not trying to be dense (it comes naturally) but that leaves me back where I started. If His point was that "this generation" would not pass UNLESS and UNTIL all those things had been fulfilled (which I already believed) then the "this generation" cannot have passed since all those things have not yet been fulfilled. Which would preclude preterism, which for me is the most important thing here...these things certainly were not fulfilled in 70 AD, but they will be.