They Made Me Gay

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Yeah, Savile and Tower Hamlets were put right immediately upon earliest suspicions. Come on, man.

Look what's happened since those revelations came to light. An absolute crackdown and imprisonment of those found guilty of sexual assaults, be they with children or adults. Was there a cover up at the time? Pretty much undoubtedly but this goes to show that society does not tolerate it and such atrocities are retroactively punished and only underscores the fact that laws have tightened since the seventies, not relaxed...

I wager you right now: somewhere there will be (at the very least) a serious attempt to relax it within our lifetimes, and successful or not the snowball will start to roll downhill.

Then you're betting against the house...
 

musterion

Well-known member
Look what's happened since those revelations came to light. An absolute crackdown and imprisonment of those found guilty of sexual assaults, be they with children or adults. Was there a cover up at the time? Pretty much undoubtedly but this goes to show that society does not tolerate it and such atrocities are retroactively punished and only underscores the fact that laws have tightened since the seventies, not relaxed...

WHICH society? In Britain? No. Now that people know how high up it went, coverups are going to be much harder to pull off.

But somewhere in Scandinavia, where they're much further down the moral toilet? It's a safe bet. Wait and see.
 

musterion

Well-known member
And if those accusations stick then what do you suppose will happen next? That he'll be prosecuted for it or given a 'thumbs up'?

Depends on who you ask. Polanski still has his die-hard defenders, even among those who acknowledge he sodomized the girl.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
yeah, you're a geenyus :dizzy:



As the UK has launched a new-judge led inquiry panel to investigate a pedophile ring operated in 1980s, the Home Secretary warns the allegations are just a “tip of an iceberg” and the problem is “woven, covertly, into the fabric of our society.”


https://www.rt.com/uk/240777-uk-sex-children-may/


Well, you certainly aren't. All you've managed to do is show an article that underscores how pedophilia is not going to be tolerated under law, to be more aware of the dangers of it and punish those who were guilty of it.

Yeah, the floodgates to societal and legal acceptance of child molestation is just around the corner...

Dipstick.

:freak:
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
All you've managed to do is show an article that underscores how pedophilia is not going to be tolerated under law, to be more aware of the dangers of it and punish those who were guilty of it.



ok artie, that's enough paste for a while




He revealed that as many as 40 British MPs and peers either knew about or took part in the Westminster “pedophile ring.”



and who writes the laws in britain?

oh yeah - MPs and peers :doh:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
WHICH society? In Britain? No. Now that people know how high up it went, coverups are going to be much harder to pull off.

But somewhere in Scandinavia, where they're much further down the moral toilet? It's a safe bet. Wait and see.

Ok, lets...
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Well, given that I live in England then yes, I'm more familiar with the laws here than you are, and there is zero tolerance under law for anything resembling child molestation. Laws have exponentially tightened in regards to the protection of children and there is no way on this planet that it will become legal for adults to have sexual relations with children. Else you point to a credible source that rebuts that. SOD was never going to rise to that challenge so how about you give it a go?




All social drift these days is toward 'consent.' If a child consents, society will permit it. You are referring to forced performance.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
All social drift these days is toward 'consent.' If a child consents, society will permit it. You are referring to forced performance.

Uh huh, so if a 10 year old "consents" to sex with a forty year old it'll be all okay in British society. You lot are downright clueless...

:freak:
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
...if a 10 year old "consents" to sex with a forty year old it'll be all okay in British society.

it already is, to a large proportion of influential british society




The paper the Guardian has become Britain’s newest champion for a minority of sorts. In a January 3 article, the UK paper has taken up the cause of pedophiles who claim they are just “ordinary members of society” that only need a little understanding.

The paper seriously presented pedophiles as but a misunderstood minority that do no real harm. As Telegraph writer Damian Thompson points out, “this is not some sick send-up” on his part. The UK Guardian is wholly serious.

Guardian feature columnist Jon Henley uncritically quotes convicted pedophiles like Tom O’Carroll, who said that children enter into such “relationships” voluntarily. “If there’s no bullying, no coercion, no abuse of power, if the child enters into the relationship voluntarily … the evidence shows there need be no harm.”

Henley then trots out a few “experts” that present “proof” that kids are not harmed by the predators that abuse them.

Thompson points out that this is the same sort of absurdly permissive attit


http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2013/01/04/uk-guardian-pedophiles-need-support/





which mirrors quip's retarded comment that brought me into this:

I can see how it may be unacceptable to you....but it's the manner in which homosexuals' express their particular sexual desires. If it's acceptable between them....then who are you and I?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
it already is, to a large proportion of influential british society




The paper the Guardian has become Britain’s newest champion for a minority of sorts. In a January 3 article, the UK paper has taken up the cause of pedophiles who claim they are just “ordinary members of society” that only need a little understanding.

The paper seriously presented pedophiles as but a misunderstood minority that do no real harm. As Telegraph writer Damian Thompson points out, “this is not some sick send-up” on his part. The UK Guardian is wholly serious.

Guardian feature columnist Jon Henley uncritically quotes convicted pedophiles like Tom O’Carroll, who said that children enter into such “relationships” voluntarily. “If there’s no bullying, no coercion, no abuse of power, if the child enters into the relationship voluntarily … the evidence shows there need be no harm.”

Henley then trots out a few “experts” that present “proof” that kids are not harmed by the predators that abuse them.

Thompson points out that this is the same sort of absurdly permissive attit


http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2013/01/04/uk-guardian-pedophiles-need-support/





which mirror's quip's retarded comment that brought me into this:

No, it isn't. You really are just thick...

:doh:
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
lalalala.jpg


:doh:

wot

a

tard
 
Top