SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
I know, I'm talking about simply voting at this point. It's to where I don't see a reason to anymore, if there ever was one.
I never have. :jawdrop:
And likely never will.
I know, I'm talking about simply voting at this point. It's to where I don't see a reason to anymore, if there ever was one.
I never have. :jawdrop:
And likely never will.
Typical Calvinist B.S.
I didn't ask you to argue that God is just, I asked you to argue that the idea that God is just does not contradict the idea that God predestined people to Hell for no reason at all.
The two truth claims, BOTH made by Reformed theology are contradictory and as your favorite Calvinist would insist, two truth claims that are in contradiction to each other cannot both be true.
So explain it, Nang, since you claimed the ability to do so.
Originally Posted by musterion:
"So I have to trust God that whatever He does, or allows to happen, is for the good."
It is not blasphemy to deny that God predestined people to an eternal Hell for no reason whatsoever.
I never have. :jawdrop:
And likely never will.
That doesn't bother me one bit. I have not registered to vote here in N.C. I've doubted I will. The last time I know I voted was in '08...I think I may have voted in '12 but knew Obama had it in the bag. Can't recall for sure.
Once I saw how the GOP shivved Palin (like her or hate her), and then how the Tea Party was quickly neutralized, and how Paul Ryan bent over for Obama once he became speaker, that was it. I became part of the Let It Burn crowd. But some part of me keeps saying I need to vote against Clinton, even though I know it won't matter, that she already has it in the bag.
But even if she doesn't, what difference will it make in the long run? Earthly speaking, we may lose it all with Trump. We will lose it all with Clinton. But isn't that what's supposed to happen? So does my involvement really matter?
Nope.
I just need to dump it all once and for all as the skubalon it is.
She's BRAINWASHED to the hilt.
Yes, quite so. But the debate isn't for her benefit, although she will derive some benefit from it indirectly, even if that benefit is undetectable by any of us.
...trust God that whatever He does, or allows to happen, is for the good.
I really cannot tell if you're being stupid or stubborn or stubbornly stupid.Well, I will first quote one of your cohorts, who gives answer to your question, quite well, and I agree (for once) with him:
See, it takes faith and trust in the goodness of God, to declare Him just in all His decrees and providence. God cannot be unjust.
Of course! But that's the biggest "if" that has ever come out of your mouth! In fact, it's not "even if" as you put it, it's "ONLY if"!Even if God created all mankind, and they volitionally sinned universally, and God had determined to eliminate all of us and every single man, woman, and child perished . . God would still be declared just.
I make no such claim. I really honestly cannot tell if this is stupidity on your part or not.You are the one making this accusation. And you do so wrongly, apparently thinking men are innocent and without blame. Not what the Scriptures teach. Romans 3:10-19
The only exception is the Man, Jesus Christ.No person ever born, deserves God's mercy, love, and grace. All deserve God's wrath.
Your doctrine teaches that Adam could not have done otherwise. His action was therefore not volitional, by definition (if you've actually read Clark, you'll recognize that an argument by definition is a valid form of argument). If the action was not volition then it wasn't moral in nature and cannot rightly be called sin.God created Adam good, and Adam volitionally shook his fist at God and defied God's commands. And you dare to call God unjust for imputing sin to Adam?
You haven't even demonstrated an ability to understand what is being asked!You are championing sin and darkness, while opposing light and life.
The answer you haughtily demand from me, is near to you, in God's Word:
Romans 9:14-20
The book of John pertained to the lost sheep of the House of Israel. You can't seem to get anything right.
Show me any rational argument that demonstrates how an arbitrary god can be just.
Resting in Him,
Clete
Yore problem is in thinking Nang is saying God is arbitrary.
That's all on you, bub.
Joh 3:14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:
Joh 3:15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
Joh 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Joh 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Joh 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Joh 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
Joh 3:20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
Joh 3:21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
LA
I stand by what I posted. The four Gospels were pertaining to the lost sheep of the House of Israel. Prove me wrong.
Yer half right.
Yer half right.
Take a shower and treat yourself to a haircut and a shave.
It's better than being "Half wrong."
He can't.I stand by what I posted. The four Gospels were pertaining to the lost sheep of the House of Israel. Prove me wrong.