Since I don't have leprosy I would have to do so, also the Levitical priests are not in service.
:yawn:
ECT There is only one Gospel
- Thread starter Interplanner
- Start date
Since I don't have leprosy I would have to do so, also the Levitical priests are not in service.
:yawn:
Apparently I was talking to that cute pooch :chuckle:
My point was that even you find that some things that had applied at one time; no longer do.
What MAD refers to as "Becuase all Scripture is for us; but it is not all to us, nor all about us - the things that differ must be considerd..."
Interplanner
Well-known member
Interplanner
Well-known member
Deal with the formidable unity of the NT. There is one faith, hope, new covenant, Gospel, body, baptism, etc. What don't you understand about that?
What don't you understand about the 3 evidences right in Gal 1-2?
Why do you want things fragmented?
What is in it for you to have several gospels? How will it help you spread the only one that matters and what happens when you do?
Interplanner
Well-known member
I don't make them say the same thing. Christ does in Lk 24. He says that all those things are unified in him and true and fulfilled in him. We probably think that's easy with Is 53 and Dan 9, but Israel has trouble with Is 53, right? And futurists have trouble with Dan 9. But he was saying the expected kingdom or reign had arrived with him. It is simply that it is not the usual.
There is only one gospel now, but not in the first century
Interplanner
Well-known member
Interplanner
Well-known member
I don't care what your conclusion is; I've heard it for a millenium. What are your REASONS?
Interplanner
Well-known member
The only other legitimate gospel (glad tidings, wonderful announcement) that has any place would be in the return from the exile; the good news of the return. That was long gone. Now come to the 1st century. He's clearly not going mess with Rome or any theocracy, Jn 6. He's there to let the power of the Gospel reign. He trains Jewish missionaries to spread it. So the idea that he only went to the lost sheep is missing why he did that--if those who blast it around think it meant there is 2P2P in the NT, which there is not.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Thanks, that should be on the list in my #4 or 5. It is so annoying to find people who think these various condensations of redemptive truth ARE IN CONFLICT!!! It is so ignorant, so amateur. And look who said it (your quote)--Peter!!!
Silly.
Paul was preaching that the man they crucified in Jerusalem and was raised from the dead, was indeed the son of God.
heir
TOL Subscriber
:up:
I'm not sure where else a Gentile would expect to find the gospel of our salvation than written by the apostle of the Gentiles (Romans 11:13 KJV) given the dispensation of the grace of God to usward (Ephesians 3:1-6 KJV)!
heir
TOL Subscriber
The WHO of Christ is not the WHY of the cross/the gospel of our salvation (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV). :duh:
heir
TOL Subscriber
The fact is, believing in the name is not the gospel of your salvation!
Nang
TOL Subscriber
I have come to the conclusion you have been given no insight into the Truth of God and the Gospel of Jesus Christ at all.
Otherwise, you would not continually and unrepentantly post the blasphemies that come into your unenlightened mind.
I fear for your soul and any other supportive friends who think you know God. Rather, more and more, you exhibit the spirit of anti-Christ, by opposing His Word and Person.
The Jews believed it was. The high priest asked the apostles, "Did we not strictly command you not to teach in this name? And look, you have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine and intend to bring this Man’s blood on us!" (Acts 5:28)
The Holy Spirit inspired Peter to exclaim, "Repent and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit." (Acts 2:38)
The gift of God through the Holy Spirit is eternal life (salvation). (Romans 6:23)
Nang
TOL Subscriber
There is no other name under heaven, by whom men can be saved. And that name is Jesus Christ (not Paul).
Are you not one of Jesus' lost sheep?
heir
TOL Subscriber
You poor soul. That is not the gospel of your salvation!
This is Paul preaching not Peter. Don't rob Paul to pay Peter. Peter told them to do something for the remission of sins looking forward to the blotting out of their sins. I already showed it to you by the scriptures here
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?118903-unfinished-business&p=4779316&viewfull=1#post4779316