Your rant is not with me. Your rant is with Paul and God's word.
You are in open rebellion against their teaching that the law has been abolished.
All that I am doing is pointing out the scripture that says that the law has been abolished for the Christian. You don't believe any of it. If I only had one scripture to convince me that the law has been abolished it would be this one.
"For sin shall not have dominion over you: FOR YOU ARE NOT UNDER THE LAW, BUT UNDER GRACE" Romans 6:14.
Because you don't believe God's word and you don't have faith that Jesus abolished the law for Christians, you will be judged by the law and condemned.
Pate, asserts, demonically, that the problem is with the law, not him, as he asserts that it makes people sin, it is not holy, spiritual, perfect, good, and he asserts on record, that it has to be abolished, for one to be saved, as the law of God, such as prohibiting rape, lying, stealing, murder.........................IS CONTRARY TO EVERYONE, NOT THE SIN DEBT, for breaking these holy...........laws.
You are of your father, the devil.
This is why the law has been abolished for the Christian.
Intoxicated, demonic "logic," as this demon infested continually spams this made up "Abolished for Christians...UNABOLISHED for the lost," butchering, in demonism, corrupting, the meaning of the word, and, once again, satanically asserting that the Saviour DID NOT DIE FOR OUR FUTURE SIN DEBT, as HE DIED TO ABOLISH THE LAW, SO THAT THERE IS NO FUTURE SIN DEBT. Thus, he ASSERTS,ON RECORD, AGAIN, THAT THE SAVIOUR DIED FOR NOTHING.
"Blotting out the handwritten of ordinances THAT WAS AGAINST US, which was CONTRARY to us and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross" Colossians 2:14.
He again , satanically,like the devil, attempts to delete "the handwriting of ordinances" of Colossians 2:14 KJV, replacing it with "law/ordinances," thus perverting, corrupting the scriptures, making it look like Paul says that Christ blotted out, made void, the law/ordinances, making it look like Paul is saying that the law/ordinances are contrary/against us, not for our benefit, instead of Paul saying that the sin debt/IOU was blotted out, as that is what is contrary to us, against us, as Paul asserts that the law is perfect, good, holy, just, spiritual, not void, in Romans 11, and the problem is with man, and the sin debt/IOU for breaking a good, holy, spiritual law, not the law itself.
You vile, wicked spammer, as your daddy the devil keeps urging you to change/delete/replace scripture.
The $2 bill of the US has been cancelled.
"the handwriting of ordinances" of Colossians 2:14 KJV,
Pate's devilish rendition:The US has been cancelled/The ordinances were cancelled.
Satanist.
Pate says the opposite, asserting that the problem is with the law, as it is not perfect/good/holy/spiritual,as he asserts that it causes us to sin, as it is sin, and the problem is not with man/him, and he asserts that the solution is to assert that Christ came to destroy/abolish/blot out the law, not to die for man's breaking the good, holy, spiritual, law of God.
Jesus being kind and merciful, knew that we could not keep it or do it, so he abolished it for us, Ephesians 2:15. You should be very happy that the law has been abolished. Paul was.
No scripture asserts that the law was abolished, madevoid, you piece of dung, as over10 verses were given to you, that asserts just the opposite, BUT YOU DELETED THEM, demon.
"But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in NEWNESS OF THE SPIRIT and not in the oldness of the letter (the law) Romans 7:6.
Pate: Delivered from=DESTROYED/MADE VOID/ABOLISHED
=satanic interpretation, butchering, corrupting the meaning of biblical words.
The purpose of the law is to judge and condemn. This is why Paul wrote to the law loving Galatians that were trying to be justified by their works.
Irrelevant to your "argument" that the law of God vanished, and your on record argument that the Saviour did not die for our sin debt.
To be under the law is to be under a curse, Galatians 3:10. Those that are under the law will perish, simply because their righteousness does not meet the standards of God's law, Romans 3:23. Let's be honest John. Do you want to stand before God in the judgment? not me. I want Jesus to stand in my place in the judgment. The only thing that is going to pass in the judgment is the righteousness of Christ. If you are not found to be in him you will perish, Philippians 3:9.
Pate:If the laws of foreign countries exist, US citizens are under their jurisdiction, and judged as guilty, so they must be destroyed.
Pate: This "Jesus" did not solve the sin issue by becoming a curse for us, being judged in our place. NO!!!!!!!!!God destroyed the law, so that there would be NO CURSE, NO SIN DEBT, for which to die!!!
YOU VILE PERVETER of the gospel of Christ-on record.
Pate/the devil revises 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV,
From: Christ
died for our sins...
To:Christ
died to destroy the law, so that their is no offence, transgression/sin debt, from which He needs to die for...
And revises Romans 4:25 KJV
From: Who was delivered
for our offences, ...
To: Who was delivered to destroy the law, so that their is no offence, transgression/sin debt, from which He needs to die for, be delivered, as there is no offence, as sin is not imputed when the law is abolished, as there is no sin debt.
....and perverting/corrupting Paul's teaching/point.
Devil child Pate asserts, on record, that the Saviour did not die for our sin debt/IOU, paying our debt, in our place, as the solution, and, instead, asserts, on record, that this "Jesus" is an incompetent, impotent fool,UNABLE TO DIE FOR ALL OF OUR SINS, future sins, as is God the Father, for even sending Him to die, as devil child Pate's "solution" to the sin/sins problem, is to eliminate the law that defines the sin/transgression, thus, "presto," there is no offense/transgression/sin for which to die, instead of the Saviour dying for our future sin debt. Do you all "get that," TOL audience? That, in simple terms, is this satanist "argument," breaking it down. Again, Pate asserts that the solution to the sin/sins issue, is not that the Saviour died for our sin debt in the future, which is contrary to us, for breaking the LORD God's perfect,good, holy,just, spiritual law, and a reflection of His character to both the saved and lost, and not that we are the problem, but the problem is with the law, as it is not perfect, it is not good, it is not holy, it is not spiritual, as laws against murder, rape, lying, stealing......are all contrary to us, so, instead of the Saviour dying in our place, to satisfy the debt/IOU, abolish the law, so that there is no offense/transgression/sin for which He should die, and thus abolish the Saviour's work, as Pate asserts that the Saviour DID NOT DIE FOR OUR FUTURE SINS, SHOULD NOT HAVE TO DIE, for our future sins/sin debt. Thus, Pate asserts he died in vain, for nothing, as his "solution" is to abolish/eliminate/destroy/make void the law, so that there is no future sin/transgression/offense, and associated/corresponding wage/sin debt to be paid for. Again-Pate-Christ died in vain.
Mayor STP:"It's not that complicated."
Pate argues that the solution to the sins issue, is not Christ dying for our sins, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, to blot out/wipe out/pay for the sin debt, both past/future, "man's IOU" for breaking the good, holy, spiritual law of God, per Paul, in Romans 7, which Paul asserts is not void, as the problem is not with man, but with the God's law, as he asserts that it is not perfect, it is not good, it is not holy, it is not just, it is not spiritual, as it is the law, that is contrary/against us, according to Pate, those troublesome prohibitions against murder, rape, sodomy, theft, adultery, lying......and not the sin debt/IOU that is contrary to/against us; Again, Pate denies that the sin debt/IOU is contrary/ against us, as He asserts that God's laws against murder, lying, rape, sodomy, theft, adultery,......................................are contrary/against us, are not for our benefit, are not good, not holy, not spiritual; His "solution" is for the LORD God to destroy/abolish/make void the law, so there is no offense to break, in the future, not Christ dying for our sins, He paying the debt/IOU for us, in our place.
Thus, Pate, on record, asserts that Christ died in vain, there was no reason to die, as He did not need to die to pay our IOU/sin debt, as all the LORD God had to do, was destroy/abolish/make void/eliminate the law, so there would not be a sin debt/IOU. Thus, he then,like the devil attempts to ...
Delete "the handwriting of ordinances" of Colossians 2:14 KJV, replacing it with "law/ordinances," thus perverting, corrupting the scriptures, making it look like Paul says that Christ blotted out, made void, the law/ordinances, making it look like Paul is saying that the law/ordinances are contrary/against us, not for our benefit, instead of Paul saying that the sin debt/IOU was blotted out, as that is what is contrary to us, against us, as Paul asserts that the law is perfect, good, holy, just, spiritual, not void, in Romans 11, and the problem is with man, and the sin debt/IOU for breaking a good, holy, spiritual law, not the law itself.
Pate says the opposite, asserting that the problem is with the law, as it is not prefect/good/holy/spiritual,as he asserts that it causes us to sin, as it is sin, and the problem is not with man/him, and he asserts that the solution is to assert that Christ came to destroy/abolish/blot out the law, not to die for man's breaking the good, holy, spiritual, law of God.
