ECT The Righteousness Which is of God

beloved57

Well-known member
Yes, according to the bankrupt theology of the Calvinists one is "regenerated" (given life) prior to believing. However, the Scriptures tell a different story:

"

A unregenerated man is in the flesh and can't please God, therefore can't believe Rom 8:8

8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

That is the unregenerated without the Spirit of Christ!
 

Ask Mr. Religion

☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) &#9
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Reading into Scripture ignoring Scripture's whole counsel leads to error

Reading into Scripture ignoring Scripture's whole counsel leads to error

Yes, according to the bankrupt theology of the Calvinists "regeneration" (receiving life) must happen prior to believing. However, the Scriptures tell another story:

"And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name"
(Jn.20:30-31).​

Here we see that believing results in life. But according to your mistaken idea life precedes believing.

I think that I will go with the Apostle John on this!
A discussion of weighty matters would move forward if folks would omit their usual anti-Calvinist canards, for they are always offered up by the uninformed. These tactics usually follow a cogent answer to their cavils, only to be rejoined by the anti-Calvinist's just moving the goalposts while ignoring what has preceded. For these eristics, it is usually becomes a game of whack-a-mole as they reach for yet another verse or two hoping to make some point.

Jerry, if you will go with John, then why not let the man speak for himself?

The passage, not to mention the declaration of Our Lord's diety, is the wonderful summary of John's Gospel and the declaration of sola scriptura: that within the word of God alone lies the solution to man's terrible ruin.

Unfortunately, you are importing more exegetical freight into the passage than it actually bears. The passage is clear that those who believe will have life. The passage is not making a didactic statement about fallen man's ability to believe at all. You just want it to say what it does not say.

If you want didactically clear teachings from Scripture about the moral state of the lost, see
Jer. 17:9; Mark 7:21-23; Eph. 2:2; Eph. 2:4-5; Titus 3:5; John 3:19; Rom. 3:10-12; 5:6; 6:16-20; Eph. 2:1,3;1 Cor. 2:14.

Given these clear teachings, reconciliation of your erroneous view of John 20:30-31 to a more accurate view is child's play. :AMR:

AMR
 

ttruscott

Well-known member
Abe was credited with God's righteousness. Care to elaborate Dr Harry?
It was not Abe's righteousness that was acredited to him...

But as a legitimate child of GOD he still had to be trained in righteousness, the choosing of only righteous things by his free will, by the painful discipline of our LORD. In other words he needed his own righteousness also, Heb 12:5-11, especially verse 11.
 

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
The passage is clear that those who believe will have life. The passage is not making a didactic statement about fallen man's ability to believe at all. You just want it to say what it does not say.

You misunderstand what the Apostle John wrote here:

"And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name"
(Jn.20:30-31).​

This not teaching that those "who believe will have life," as you imagine. Instead, John states in no uncertain terms that those who are believing have life. Both the Greek word translated "believing" and the word translated "ye might have" are in the "present" tense.

Therefore we can understand that believing results in life.

But according to the Calvinists the giving of life precedes believing.

How can the Calvinists get these simple things so wrong?
 
Last edited:

Jerry Shugart

Well-known member
But as a legitimate child of GOD he still had to be trained in righteousness, the choosing of only righteous things by his free will, by the painful discipline of our LORD. In other words he needed his own righteousness also, Heb 12:5-11, especially verse 11.

Yes, we are to strive to establish our own righteousness, but not for salvation. Here is what Paul said:

"And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faithfulness of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith" (Phil.3:9).​
 

Nang

TOL Subscriber
Why do you change the subject?

Will you not admit that before one can be blinded he must first be able to see?

No, of course not.

Since Adam, all his progeny are born spiritually blind, and will never possess spiritual insight (ability) to obey and pleaseGod, unless and until regeneration is granted to them from above, that gifts them with spiritual capacity to love God and believe His message of saving grace (Gospel of Jesus Christ).
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
No, of course not.

Since Adam, all his progeny are born spiritually blind, and will never possess spiritual insight (ability) to obey and pleaseGod, unless and until regeneration is granted to them from above, that gifts them with spiritual capacity to love God and believe His message of saving grace (Gospel of Jesus Christ).


Right: 'that (faith) is not of yourselves; it (faith) is the gift of God' Eph 2.
 
Top