I'm on point now.
Read John 3:8. Why are people so afraid of the Bible not saying what they want it to say? That is rhetorical, it is not directed at you.
I'm on point now.
I disagree. :box:
Born of water, born of Spirit, the womb, the tomb.
Read John 3:8. Why are people so afraid of the Bible not saying what they want it to say? That is rhetorical, it is not directed at you.
Is it possible that the phrase "born again" does not have the exact same meaning in those two different contexts?
My observation is that MADists are not good students of the Old Testament, very poor. Outside from their dispensationalist separating of Israel from the church, they're weak. Thus Arnold 's book - Israelology the Missing Link in Systematic Theology.
I sound like a jerk and I am one but you really need to rethink your understanding of the law. Your far from understanding its purpose in a complete and fuller way as I do. That's why you don't see the fact (little sister) that the law of Moses was one complete unit comprising 613 laws that James said if you've blown even one that you're now guilty of having broken all 613 of them.
The question is why can't you see that?
Better get back to school littlin.
Sent from my iPhone using TOL
For lack of a better word in my vocabulary, He seems to be like a "ninja."Everyone that is born of the Spirit, is like the wind.
You cannot tell from where they have come, or where they have gone.
Examine the LORD's coming and going after his resurrection.
Is it possible that the phrase "born again" does not have the exact same meaning in those two different contexts?
Exactly. So is born again.
I believe that it's clear that the "born again" in John and the "born again" in Peter are not the same.I see no reason for believing that the meanings are different.
Do you think that the words "born again, "born of the Spirit," and "born of God" are all referring to the same birth?
If being born again is something which will happen in the future then why did Peter say the following in the present tense?:
"Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever" (1 Pet.1:23).
The born of water, born of Spirit, etc., are the other passages there. But that is not what John 3:8 is talking about.
born of Spirit...But that is not what John 3:8 is talking about.
You are quiet the liar. You just exposed yourself. Well, I already pointed out you are false. Let's recap.
8 The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear the sound of it, but cannot tell where it comes from and where it goes. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit.”
I believe that it's clear that the "born again" in John and the "born again" in Peter are not the same.
I guess that you're a dictionary theologian.It is not clear to me. Why is it clear to you?
I guess that you're a dictionary theologian.
Everyone that is born of the Spirit, is like the wind.
You cannot tell from where they have come, or where they have gone.
Examine the LORD's coming and going after his resurrection.
So he is talking about the need to "ascend" up to heaven (be resurrected) in order to see the kingdom of God. Man has been born into the earthly realm with a natural body, but has yet to be born into the heavenly real with a spiritual body.
I guess that you're a dictionary theologian.
Yes, I do. I believe that Jesus' explanation of what He meant does not match with what Peter was expressing.Why do you think that the meaning of the words "born again" as used by the Lord Jesus is entirely different from the meaning of them as used by Peter?