But it was still referring to Israel.
but it was not green anymore
But it was still referring to Israel.
but it was not green anymore
Not all.
Apparently, some were.
I asked you:
Were all those in the church at Rome circumcised and were they told to keep the law of Moses?
To this you answered:
If not all of them were circumcised then does that mean that only some in the church at Rome were grafted into Israel?
Besides, why would anyone be grafted into Israel at the time when that nation was cast away and described as being dead?:
"For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?" (Ro.11:15).
Well, the axe had not yet been laid to the tree while Acts dragged on...
By the time the epistle to the Romans was written we read this about Israel:
"For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?" (Ro.11:15).
Yep! Things are changing in the book of Acts: the fall, diminishing and casting awayThey were not cast away during Acts.
Romans, written at Acts 20, is looking ahead to their casting away.
Yep! Things are changing in the book of Acts: the fall, diminishing and casting away
"the times they are a changin'"~B. Dylan
25 For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:
“The Deliverer will come out of Zion,
And He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob;
27 For ethis is My covenant with them,
When I take away their sins.” Romans 11:25-27
They were not cast away during Acts.
Romans, written at Acts 20, is looking ahead to their casting away.
Wrong, it was the casting aside of Israel which resulted in the reconciliation of the world:
Wrong
The mystery of the gospel was still hidden at that point.
They were not cast away during Acts.
Romans, written at Acts 20, is looking ahead to their casting away.
The post was reference to the Jews being saved by another gospel, which comes after the Rapture
Anything's better than an I can be cut off'er LOLI'm not sure where you are fitting that into the above - are you also an Almost 28er?
Lol, just bustin chops on that Almost bit; it tends to get too serious around here..
As usual you change the subject and refused to answer my remarks to what you said here:
Cut down on the Shugart. It's hazardous to sound doctrine.You are the greatest. I now agree with everything you say.
I am a Shugartite.