The Good Wine

jsanford108

New member

S-word..........My only quote from the Old Testament in my previous post to you, was Genesis 5: 23; “Enoch was 365 and had spent his life in fellowship with God when he disappeared because God had Taken him,”and if you deny that Enoch was taken by God at the age of 365 and was translated in order that he should never see death, as revealed in the NT, then you deny the Word of God.

Jsanfore108..........Two quick things that come to mind are Jude being a half-brother of Jesus (false: there is literally no evidence to even vaguely support this),

S-word..........Matthew 13: 55; Isn’t he the carpenter’s son? And isn’t Mary his mother, and aren’t James, Joseph, Simon and Jude his brothers. And aren’t all his sisters living here?

KJV; Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. The Amplified version, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. Living New Testament, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. RSV, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. GNB Catholic Study Edition, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. The Jerusalem Bible, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James.

I think that there is enough evidence there to prove that Jude is the brother of James, who Paul states is the brother of Jesus, and it was James the brother of Jesus and half brother to Jude, who was the first to sit upon the Episcopal throne of the church of the Circumcision, Simon who is also a son of the carpenter, was the one who succeeded his brother James as the leader of the Jerusalem church of Jesus.

It is from the writings of Josephus the historian, Eusebius, and Hegessippus, we learn that in 62 AD, James was murdered at the instigation of one of that same Sadducee sect responsible for the death of his brother Jesus, and that he was subsequently succeeded by Simon, (who was another half brother to Jesus.)

Simeon a half-brother to Jesus, was succeeded by 13 other Bishops of the circumcision, among who, several others, like Simeon and James, appear to have been blood relatives of Jesus. In 132 AD, with the second Jewish revolt, the line was extinguished. Epiphanius of Salamis, in his Panarion, mentions Judah Kyriakos, the great grandson of Jude, as the last Jewish Bishop of Jerusalem that lived beyond Bar Kokhba’s revolt.

Hegesippus, mentions descendant of Jude living in the reign of Domitian, 81-96 AD.

In his book, “Historia Ecclesiae” Eusebius wrote; “But when the same Domitian had commanded the descendants of David should be slain, an ancient tradition says that some of the heretics brought accusations against the descendants of Jude (Said to have been a brother of the saviour according to the flesh) on the grounds that they were of the lineage of David and were related to Christ himself.

Hegesippus relates these facts in the following words; “Of the family of the Lord there were still living the grandchildren of Jude (The Twin) who is said to have been the Lord’s brother according to the flesh.

It was not uncommon in those days, for a Jewish Galilean to have three names, one in Hebrew, one in Greek and one in Aramaic

Jude=Hebrew, Thomas=Tau’ma, the Aramiac for twin, is also called Didymus, which is the Greek for twin, he is Thomas/twin, Didymus/twin, Jude, the half-brother of Jesus and the son of the carpenter. A local tradition of eastern Syria identifies the Apostle Jude with Jude Thomas who was called ‘The Twin’ also known as Thomas (Aramaic), Didymus (Greek), and Jude (Hebrew.)

Knowing that in ART, Thomas Didymus Jude, is depicted with a, carpenters rule and square: In "The Acts of Thomas, sometimes called by its full name, "The Acts of Judas Thomas," 2nd-3rd century CE, "The Apostles cast lots as to where they should go, and to Thomas, brother to Jesus fell India. Thomas was taken to King Goddophares the ruler of Indo-Pathian Kingdom as an architect and carpenter by Habban.”

I would like to go deeper into this subject for you, but I realise that you are as yet, not really interested in the truths as revealed in scripture, but more interested in defending the lies and rubbish, which are the spirit/words of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine, the next subject that you wish to discuss.

Jsanford108 wrote..........and the Roman Catholic Church (many flaws in your history here, one being Constantine starting it, another being their rejection of early Christian writings when they are the only ones who keep them dear).


But first I need a cup of tea and a sandwich, then, “I’ll be Baaack.”

BTW, you don't need to apologise yet for saying, "There is literally no evidence to even vaguely support the suggestion that Jude the brother of James is related to Jesus."


I never denied Enoch being called to Heaven. I don't honestly know why you keep mentioning that.

Yes, Christ is a "carpenter's son." However, recall that Joseph was not Christ's paternal father. So to utilize "carpenter's son" as a literal example of genealogy is false. And no, Christ had no other brothers or sisters. Simple examination of the New Testament genealogies is proof of this. James' father was not Joseph. Nor Joseph, Simon, or Jude. All have fathers who aren't Joseph. The only attempt you could maintain at an argument here is that Mary, mother of Christ, is their maternal link. However, this would go against a plethora of logic, especially in the times of Christ and His apostles.

So why do the Scriptures say brother? And even the writings of Early Christians? A simple education in Aramic and Greek would reveal that the ancient writers use the same terms for "brother" as "cousin" or "relatives." They did not utilize the various titles that we have today. Likewise, when we say "Brother in Christ," that does not make us physically related, does it? It is always interesting to see the mental attempts utilized in disproving rather simple fact (Christ being the only son of Mary/Joseph) and extrapolating rather ridiculous falsehoods (Like Jesus having literal brothers).

So let us go deeper into Scripture. Lead this conversation where you want to discuss. It is always interesting to see how one such as yourself examines Scripture.

As for the Catholic question, I will reply to that post next.
 

jsanford108

New member
Continued from post #56.

Jsanford108 wrote..........and the Roman Catholic Church (many flaws in your history here, one being Constantine starting it, another being their rejection of early Christian writings when they are the only ones who keep them dear).

If you don't believe that the books of Enoch were banned by early dogmatic Christian authorities, then just Google it up mate and you will find that the Book of Enoch, was removed and Banned from the Bible in 381 AD after some church fathers did not approve of the actions of the fallen angels having sex...

Fancy the Roman church authorities being offended by the fallen angels having sex. At least they had sex with grown women, and not little children of both genders.

S-word..........First of all, you must understand how the universal church of 325 AD, was founded and from what it was founded and upon what foundation it was built: because you are not referring here to the teachings of the Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ, but rather, to the false teachings of the universal church of Constantine.

Not only did the apostles not teach the Jesus of the universal church, neither did they teach the false doctrine of the non-biblical immaculate conception of Mary or of the supposedly virgin birth of Jesus.

We know that the universal church of King Constantine was formed from a rag-tag group of quarrelling and insult hurling religious bodies that called themselves Christians. King Constantine, finally sick to the stomach with their constant bickering, called together all the heads of those quarrelling bodies to the first ever "World Council of Churches" where, under the dominating presence of the non-christian and almost certainly theologically illiterate King Constantine, the universal church was established in 325 AD, some 300 years after the Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ had been established in Jerusalem.

In the days of the Apostle Paul who in 1st Timothy 1: 1; says: "From Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by order of "GOD OUR SAVIOUR" and Christ Jesus "OUR HOPE."" The people were already beginning to fall away from the truth, and following another gospel that was not taught by the word of God or the apostles.

In his 2nd letter to the Corinthians 11: 4; Paul says, "You gladly tolerate anyone who comes to you and preaches a different Jesus, not the one we preached; and you accept a spirit (The Lie) and a gospel completely different from the spirit (Of Truth) and the gospel you received from us."

So, What was that other gospel, Way back in the days of Paul, that was leading the people away from the truth and away from the Jesus as preached by the Apostles, to another false Jesus?

That gospel was the word of the anti-christ that refused to acknowledge that Jesus had come as a human being, and instead, they believed that he was a spirit, who, like some Hologram, would appear and disappear at will.

Even in the days of John, the false teaching that Jesus was not of the seed of Adam from which every human being who has, or ever will walk this earth, has descended, and those who believed this falsehood that Jesus had not come as a human being, but as a spiritual being, was already beginning to be spread throughout the world, and concerning that evolving falsehood, John had this to say.

From the catholic Study Edition of the bible: 1st letter of John 4:1-3; "My dear friends, do not believe all who claim to have the spirit/teaching, (My words are spirit said the Lord through his servant Jesus) but test them to find out if the spirit/teaching they have comes from God. For many false prophets have gone out everywhere. This is how you will be able to know if it is Gods spirit/word: anyone who acknowledges that Jesus came as a human being has the spirit/teaching, who comes from God. But anyone who denies this about Jesus does not have the spirit from God. The spirit that he has is from the enemy of the anointed one, the Anti-christ etc."

2nd letter of John verses 7-10;."Many deceivers have gone out all over the world, people who do not acknowledge that Jesus came as a human being. Such a person is a deceiver and an enemy of Christ."

If you would care to open your eyes, I"m sure that you will have little difficulty in finding the teaching of the anti-christ, which does not deny that Jesus had come, but which refused to acknowledge that Jesus was a true human being born of the seed of Adam, and descended through the genetic line of David, which lie has been spread throughout the entire WORLD.

Over the centuries the false teaching of the anti-christ continued to evolve. But as the followers of the anti-christ became more enlightened and harder to deceive. In Alexandria, by the second century, Docetism, the concept that Jesus had existed as a spirit rather than a human being, had all but theoretically been stamped out.

But still, there persisted the belief that their false Jesus, although seen as a sort of human being, did not have our normal bodily needs, such as eating, drinking and having to go to the toilet, and Clement the bishop of Alexandria, wrote: "It would be ridiculous to imagine that the redeemer, in order to exist, had the usual needs of man. He only took food and ate it in order that we should not teach about him in a Docetic fashion."

Satan must have been some sort of an idiot believing that this false Jesus of theirs, who had no need of food such as we human beings do, was starving hungry after a mere 40 days without food, who then tried to tempt him into turning stones into bread.

Their Jesus was not the Jesus as taught by the apostles, but that other Jesus, taught by the Anti-Christ, who unlike we mere HUMAN BEINGS, did not need to eat, drink, or go to the toilet, as was taught by one of the great teachers that the members of the universal church, loved to use as one of their authorities when trying to defend one of their false doctrines.

Saint Clement of Alexandria, who was a saint in the Martyrology of the Roman universal church of Emperor Constantine, in support of the great lie, speaks of the time that some imaginary midwife, (Which is not supported by scripture) who was supposed to be at the birth of Jesus, told some woman by the name Salome, that the mother was still a virgin after the birth and that her hymen was still intact, (Which is not supported by scripture) and that this supposed Salome, stuck her finger into the mother's vagina to check, and her hand immediately withered up, but the baby Jesus reached out and touched her hand and healed it. (What a load of unadulterated Rubbish)

Down to the 17th century Clement was venerated as a saint. His name was to be found in the Martyrologies, and his feast fell on December 4. But when the Roman Martyrology was revised by Clement VIII (Pope from 1592 to 1605), his name was dropped from the calendar on the advice of his confessor, Cardinal Baronius. Pope Benedict XIV in 1748 maintained his predecessor's decision on the grounds that Clement's life was little-known; that he had never obtained public cultus in the Church; and that some of his doctrines were, if not erroneous, at least highly suspect.

Erroneous and highly suspect, you can say that again, but by then the great lie had become so entrenched in the minds of the gullible that their heads were so mixed up and set as hard as concrete, one would need a sledge hammer to shatter that conglomerat and allow the light of truth to shine in.

Clement, who lived between 150"211 AD was expressing a belief that was already firmly established by those who had abandoned the Jesus as taught by the apostles.

The Lord now has need of some good children of God, to root out the weeds that were planted by the Famous Prostitute and her harlot denominational daughters who have been brought up on her spiritual rubbish.

To be Continued.

"Fancy the Roman church authorities being offended by the fallen angels having sex. At least they had sex with grown women, and not little children of both genders:" It is always interesting when Protestants point this out as a "fact." When simple research shows that of all Christian denominations, there is a total of around 2% involved in sexual deviance (molestation, assault, etc). The statistics across the board show less than 2% for Catholics (mind you, they utilize the entire history of the Catholic Church, since before 300 AD). And slightly above 2% for every denomination (hence my earlier statistic). However, consider the timelines. How can Baptists have 2% when they have been around in such a short time frame? These statistics point to a more rapid descent into sexual immorality for Protestant denominations. And in each denomination, it was investigated what happened to the perps. Catholics are excommunicated in most circumstances (obviously there are examples where this did not occur). Protestants are generally promoted to higher positions or transferred to other posts (obviously there are examples where this did not occur). It would appear that Protestants are way more sexually deviant than Catholics. Cases of pedophilia are also higher with protestant denominations, despite the opposite being the believed "fact." (All these statistics can easily be found online, such as GRACE, a group of investigators started by the Billy Graham group).

"That gospel was the word of the anti-christ that refused to acknowledge that Jesus had come as a human being, and instead, they believed that he was a spirit, who, like some Hologram, would appear and disappear at will:" These are the teachings of Gnostics, not Catholics.

"Saint Clement of Alexandria, who was a saint in the Martyrology of the Roman universal church of Emperor Constantine, in support of the great lie, speaks of the time that some imaginary midwife, (Which is not supported by scripture) who was supposed to be at the birth of Jesus, told some woman by the name Salome, that the mother was still a virgin after the birth and that her hymen was still intact, (Which is not supported by scripture) and that this supposed Salome, stuck her finger into the mother's vagina to check, and her hand immediately withered up, but the baby Jesus reached out and touched her hand and healed it. (What a load of unadulterated Rubbish)

Down to the 17th century Clement was venerated as a saint. His name was to be found in the Martyrologies, and his feast fell on December 4. But when the Roman Martyrology was revised by Clement VIII (Pope from 1592 to 1605), his name was dropped from the calendar on the advice of his confessor, Cardinal Baronius. Pope Benedict XIV in 1748 maintained his predecessor's decision on the grounds that Clement's life was little-known; that he had never obtained public cultus in the Church; and that some of his doctrines were, if not erroneous, at least highly suspect.

Erroneous and highly suspect, you can say that again, but by then the great lie had become so entrenched in the minds of the gullible that their heads were so mixed up and set as hard as concrete, one would need a sledge hammer to shatter that conglomerat and allow the light of truth to shine in
." This entire quote is taken from another source. These are not your words. Nor were any of these alternate theories ever held by the Catholic Church. Please provide evidence that it was accepted. Go ahead. Try and find it.

"First of all, you must understand how the universal church of 325 AD, was founded and from what it was founded and upon what foundation it was built: because you are not referring here to the teachings of the Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ, but rather, to the false teachings of the universal church of Constantine.

Not only did the apostles not teach the Jesus of the universal church, neither did they teach the false doctrine of the non-biblical immaculate conception of Mary or of the supposedly virgin birth of Jesus:" And here is the most common history revisionism done by anti-Catholics. Allow us to examine historical facts, both withing Christianity, as well as secular.

Teachings as early as 35 AD, align with Catholic doctrines of today (they are unchanging). The Gospel writer, John, had an apprentice, named Polycarp. Polycarp is a Saint in the Catholic Church. He taught doctrines such as; the Immaculate Conception of Mary, Mary as an Ever-Virgin (Perpetual Virginity of Mary being the proper doctrine title), Infant Baptism, the Eucharist (literal Body and Blood of Christ in the Last Supper), prayer to saints, etc. Who else taught this (as proof that Catholicism is the Apostolic Church)? Here is a brief list, with their dates: Gospel Writers (until around 75 AD that we have records of), Polycarp (died around 155 AD), Ignatius of Antioch (35-107 AD), Eusebius (86 AD), Pliny the Younger (62-114 AD), Justin Martyr (100-165 AD), Theophilus of Antioch (185-191 AD), Irenaeus (130-200 AD), Clement of Alexandria (150-215 AD), Tertullian (160-225 AD), Origen (185-254 AD), Cyprian of Carthage (martyred 258 AD), Athanasius (296- 373 AD). The actual list is obviously much longer, but this is a short list for time and reading's sake.

I specifically listed those who existed before Emperor Constantine. So let's examine that actual history.

Constantine became Emperor around 312 AD. In 324-325, he legalized Christianity. He was not a Christian at this time. He was not Catholic or any denomination. He was pagan. At this time, 325 AD, the Pope was St. Sylvester I. Sylvester was the 33rd Pope (easily found online, as well as many catholic and secular sources). Around 336-337 AD, Constantine "converted" to Christianity (even this is debatable). From this point, there are six emperors before the first Christian Emperor, who is Augustine, who converts in 336 AD. The Pope in Augustine's time is St. Siricius, who is the 38th Pope.

How interesting that there could be 33 popes before Constantine "founded Catholicism." And how interesting that the first Emperor to actually rule as a Catholic would be so many decades later. See how actual history is in direct contradiction with your claims and arguments?

Now, you are not the first to do this, nor will you be the last. This amended history is best recognized in appearing in Boettner's "Roman Catholicism." This history is amended to try and illustrate how Catholics aren't Christians, and to further push the twisted ideologies of Catholicism being the great Harlot, Whore of Babylon, Anti-Christ, etc. And I can understand how you have accepted this amended history, and that is because it was taught to you this way. And those who taught you were taught. The process goes back to when the early Church was first forming in the days of the apostles. So no sweat, friend.

At this point, feel free to discuss any point you would like. Be that Scriptural evidence of whatever. Or even Catholic Doctrine (as I am sure the Marian doctrines have inflamed you, such as Perpetual Virginity of Mary and Immaculate Conception). I am open for conversation and discussion.

Until next time.
 

S-word

BANNED
Banned
"Fancy the Roman church authorities being offended by the fallen angels having sex. At least they had sex with grown women, and not little children of both genders:" It is always interesting when Protestants point this out as a "fact." When simple research shows that of all Christian denominations, there is a total of around 2% involved in sexual deviance (molestation, assault, etc). The statistics across the board show less than 2% for Catholics (mind you, they utilize the entire history of the Catholic Church, since before 300 AD). And slightly above 2% for every denomination (hence my earlier statistic). However, consider the timelines. How can Baptists have 2% when they have been around in such a short time frame? These statistics point to a more rapid descent into sexual immorality for Protestant denominations. And in each denomination, it was investigated what happened to the perps. Catholics are excommunicated in most circumstances (obviously there are examples where this did not occur). Protestants are generally promoted to higher positions or transferred to other posts (obviously there are examples where this did not occur). It would appear that Protestants are way more sexually deviant than Catholics. Cases of pedophilia are also higher with protestant denominations, despite the opposite being the believed "fact." (All these statistics can easily be found online, such as GRACE, a group of investigators started by the Billy Graham group).

"That gospel was the word of the anti-christ that refused to acknowledge that Jesus had come as a human being, and instead, they believed that he was a spirit, who, like some Hologram, would appear and disappear at will:" These are the teachings of Gnostics, not Catholics.

"Saint Clement of Alexandria, who was a saint in the Martyrology of the Roman universal church of Emperor Constantine, in support of the great lie, speaks of the time that some imaginary midwife, (Which is not supported by scripture) who was supposed to be at the birth of Jesus, told some woman by the name Salome, that the mother was still a virgin after the birth and that her hymen was still intact, (Which is not supported by scripture) and that this supposed Salome, stuck her finger into the mother's vagina to check, and her hand immediately withered up, but the baby Jesus reached out and touched her hand and healed it. (What a load of unadulterated Rubbish)

Down to the 17th century Clement was venerated as a saint. His name was to be found in the Martyrologies, and his feast fell on December 4. But when the Roman Martyrology was revised by Clement VIII (Pope from 1592 to 1605), his name was dropped from the calendar on the advice of his confessor, Cardinal Baronius. Pope Benedict XIV in 1748 maintained his predecessor's decision on the grounds that Clement's life was little-known; that he had never obtained public cultus in the Church; and that some of his doctrines were, if not erroneous, at least highly suspect.

Erroneous and highly suspect, you can say that again, but by then the great lie had become so entrenched in the minds of the gullible that their heads were so mixed up and set as hard as concrete, one would need a sledge hammer to shatter that conglomerat and allow the light of truth to shine in
." This entire quote is taken from another source. These are not your words. Nor were any of these alternate theories ever held by the Catholic Church. Please provide evidence that it was accepted. Go ahead. Try and find it.

"First of all, you must understand how the universal church of 325 AD, was founded and from what it was founded and upon what foundation it was built: because you are not referring here to the teachings of the Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ, but rather, to the false teachings of the universal church of Constantine.

Not only did the apostles not teach the Jesus of the universal church, neither did they teach the false doctrine of the non-biblical immaculate conception of Mary or of the supposedly virgin birth of Jesus:" And here is the most common history revisionism done by anti-Catholics. Allow us to examine historical facts, both withing Christianity, as well as secular.

Teachings as early as 35 AD, align with Catholic doctrines of today (they are unchanging). The Gospel writer, John, had an apprentice, named Polycarp. Polycarp is a Saint in the Catholic Church. He taught doctrines such as; the Immaculate Conception of Mary, Mary as an Ever-Virgin (Perpetual Virginity of Mary being the proper doctrine title), Infant Baptism, the Eucharist (literal Body and Blood of Christ in the Last Supper), prayer to saints, etc. Who else taught this (as proof that Catholicism is the Apostolic Church)? Here is a brief list, with their dates: Gospel Writers (until around 75 AD that we have records of), Polycarp (died around 155 AD), Ignatius of Antioch (35-107 AD), Eusebius (86 AD), Pliny the Younger (62-114 AD), Justin Martyr (100-165 AD), Theophilus of Antioch (185-191 AD), Irenaeus (130-200 AD), Clement of Alexandria (150-215 AD), Tertullian (160-225 AD), Origen (185-254 AD), Cyprian of Carthage (martyred 258 AD), Athanasius (296- 373 AD). The actual list is obviously much longer, but this is a short list for time and reading's sake.

I specifically listed those who existed before Emperor Constantine. So let's examine that actual history.

Constantine became Emperor around 312 AD. In 324-325, he legalized Christianity. He was not a Christian at this time. He was not Catholic or any denomination. He was pagan. At this time, 325 AD, the Pope was St. Sylvester I. Sylvester was the 33rd Pope (easily found online, as well as many catholic and secular sources). Around 336-337 AD, Constantine "converted" to Christianity (even this is debatable). From this point, there are six emperors before the first Christian Emperor, who is Augustine, who converts in 336 AD. The Pope in Augustine's time is St. Siricius, who is the 38th Pope.

How interesting that there could be 33 popes before Constantine "founded Catholicism." And how interesting that the first Emperor to actually rule as a Catholic would be so many decades later. See how actual history is in direct contradiction with your claims and arguments?

Now, you are not the first to do this, nor will you be the last. This amended history is best recognized in appearing in Boettner's "Roman Catholicism." This history is amended to try and illustrate how Catholics aren't Christians, and to further push the twisted ideologies of Catholicism being the great Harlot, Whore of Babylon, Anti-Christ, etc. And I can understand how you have accepted this amended history, and that is because it was taught to you this way. And those who taught you were taught. The process goes back to when the early Church was first forming in the days of the apostles. So no sweat, friend.

At this point, feel free to discuss any point you would like. Be that Scriptural evidence of whatever. Or even Catholic Doctrine (as I am sure the Marian doctrines have inflamed you, such as Perpetual Virginity of Mary and Immaculate Conception). I am open for conversation and discussion.

Until next time.

Is it not true, that you believe 'YOUR' Jesus to be an eternal alien life form, who was the creator of the entire cosmos with his father, who was not actually his father as he was one and the same as his father, and that 2,000 years ago he decided to come down to earth where he entered the womb of some supposed every virgin and created for himself a human like body, which was not of the seed of Adam from which all humans have descended?

And did this immortal alien who could not die, dispose of his physical human like body in which he had disguised himself as a human being, then return to his heavenly abode, to be heard of never since?
 

daqq

Well-known member
Says ΙΑΩΑ Elohim the Almighty: I am the ΩΑ
Yeshayah-Isa 41:4, 43:10, 43:13, 46:4, 48:12, 52:6
(אני הוא [1QIsaaאני הואה])

See also Trigrammaton:
4Q120, Codex Marchalianus, Vat.Gr.2125

The personification of the Memra or "the Word" originally comes from the Targums, (see Jewish Encyclopedia, Memra, for a primer), and the personification of the Logos is no doubt an expansion of that understanding. I do believe it all derives from Psalm 40, which is a "new song" about an old scroll which is about to be retired, (its "iniquities" are not iniquities but tatters, rips, and tears; in other words, as one of the meanings in the definition states, "contortions", and that is why the author of the epistle to the Hebrews sees no problem in applying the passage to Messiah). Think about this as you read and study the entire Psalm in your quiet time.

This is a Torah Scroll, the Word, coming into the world:

Psalm 40:7-8
6 Sacrifice and offering you did not desire; mine earlets you have punctured-pierced: burnt offering and sin offering you have not requested.
7 Then said I, Behold, I come: in the mgillat-header of the Sefer it is written concerning me.
8 I delight to do your will, O my Elohim: your Torah is within my inward parts.

Hebrews 10:5-7
5 Wherefore when he enters into the world, he says, Sacrifice and offering you did not desire, but a body have you prepare for me:
6 In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin you had no pleasure:
7 Then said I, Behold, I am come, in the κεφαλιδι-header of the Sefer it is written concerning me: I delight to do your will, O Elohim.


In the mgillat-kephalidi-header of the Sefer it is written concerning me . . .
That is, the crown-header of the Sefer, in the right hand side, Breshiyt-Genesis 1:1-5.


Notice he pierces or punctures "earlets" into the ends of the scroll with an awl, (or aul). However the entire roll is comprised of many souls having been "knit together" as one, (and we know, as in the case with Paul, μεμβρανας, which are are lambskin parchments, 2Tim 4:13, were used). Thus the Hebrew, (Psalm 40:6), and the Greek, (Psalm 40:6 OG LXX [39:7] has ωτια, "earlets", while Hebrews 10:5 has σωμα-body), are both correct because the "body", (σωμα), of Heb 10:5 is a metonymy for the entire "volume" of the "body" of the scroll, (κεφαλιδι-κεφαλις is rendered "volume" in the KJV but is also used in the LXX for chapiters, crowns, headers, and may even refer to a "head chapter" or header in a writing). That is precisely what this is; the header or head-section of the scroll, like a crown or the chapiter of the Sefer, (Genesis 1:1-5). Thus the lower σταυρος-stave borne by Shimon Kurenaio is of the erets-land-earth, (Genesis 1:1), while the top σταυρος-stave borne by Messiah reaches to the shamayim-heavens, (Genesis 1:1).

And what do we find at the right hand side in the κεφαλιδι header of the Scroll?

Genesis 1:1-5
1 In the beginning Elohim cut-down-created the heavens and the earth.
2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep: and Ruach Elohim brooded upon the face of the waters.
3 And Elohim said, Let there be light: and there was light.
4 And Elohim saw the light, that it was good: and Elohim divided the light from the darkness.
5 And Elohim called the light, Yom, and the darkness He called Night. And there is evening, and there is morning: Yom Echad.


In the mgillat-kephalidi header of the Sefer it is written concerning me:
Ruach Elohim - the Memra - the Logos - the Word - the Yonah


1 John 1:1-2
1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have beheld, and which our hands have handled, concerns the Word of life.
2 And the life was made manifest, and we have seen, and bear witness, and we announce unto you the life αιωνιον which was with the Father, and was made manifest unto us.

Who was from the beginning: Who we have heard: Who we have seen with our eyes: Who we have looked upon, and which our hands have handled, the Word of Life in the lambskin Sefer, whose earlets were pierced coming into the world, being affixed to the Atzei Chayim: Who we declare unto you.

[01] In the beginning was the Memra, and the Memra was with the Elohim, and the Memra was Elohim: the same was in the beginning with the Elohim.
[02] All things through him came into being; and outside of him came nothing into being which has come into being.
[03] In him was life, and the life was the light of men: and the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness admits it not.
[04] There was a man sent from Elohim, of name Yohanan: the same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men by way of him might be fully convinced.
[05] He was not the Light but was sent to bear witness of the Light: the Light was the truth which lights every man that comes into the world.
[06] The same was in the world, and the world came to be through him, and the world knew him not: he came unto his own and his own received him not.
[07] But as many as receive him, to them he gives authority to become offspring of Elohim: those faithfully trusting into his name, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but from Elohim having been produced.
[08] And the Memra became flesh, and has tabernacled among us, but all flesh is not the same flesh: there is one kind of flesh of men, another of beasts, even μεμβρανας which are the lambskins of the Word, and another of fish, and another of birds, and therefore likewise doves.
[09] There are bodies heavenly, and bodies earthly; but the glory of the heavenly is one, and the glory of the earthly is another: if there is a physical body, there is an ethereal body.
[10] And we have perceived his glory, glory as of an only begotten of a Father, replete with graciousness and truth.
[11] Yohanan testifies of him, and he has cried out, saying, This is of whom it was that I said, The one coming behind me, in front of me has become, because before me he was: for of his fullness we have all received, even graciousness in exchange for graciousness.
[12] Because the Torah through Mosheh was given: the grace and the truth has come to be through Meshiah Ι̅H.
[13] No one has seen Elohim at any time; the only begotten Elohim-Son who is in the Bay of the Father, that one has expounded Him.
[14] And this is the testimonial witness of Yohanan, when the Yhudim from Yerushalem sent Kohanim and Leviim asking him, Who are you?
[15] And he confessed and did not deny, and confessed, I am not the Meshiah.
[16] And they asked him, What then? Are you Elyahω? and he said, I am not. Are you the Prophet? and he answered, No.
[17] They said therefore to him, Who are you? so that we may give an answer to them that sent us: what say you of yourself?
[18] He said, I am Kol Kore bamidbar, Voice of a Cryer in the desert, Make yourselves straight the Way of ΙΑΩΑ, as haNavi Yeshayahω says.
[19] Also there were Perushim sent; they also questioned him, and said to him, Why then do you immerse if you are not the Meshiah, neither Elyahω, neither the Prophet?
[20] Answering them Yohanan said, I immerse with water, but in your midst stands one whom you know not: behind me is coming whom I am not worthy to loosen the strap of his sandal.
[21] These things came to pass in Beth-Ania, beyond Yarden, where Yohanan was immersing.
[22] The next day Yohanan beheld the Ι̅H coming down to him, and behold, a voice from the heavens, This is My Son, the Beloved, with whom I make approval, then Yohanan said, Behold, the Amnos of Elohim, who sails away the sins of the world! (then the Ι̅H left him).
[23] Then said Yohanan, This is of whom I said, Behind me comes a Gaber who in front of me has become, for before me he was:
[24] And I knew him not! but that he should be made manifest to Yisrael, for this cause I came immersing with water.
[25] And Yohanan testified, saying, For I perceive the Spirit descending like a dove out of heaven and abiding remaining upon them:
[26] And I knew him not! but He that sent me to immerse in water said to me, Upon whoever you see the Spirit descending and abiding-remaining upon him, the same he is immersing with Spirit Holy.
[27] I also have envisioned and have testified how that is the Son of Elohim.
[28] Who has ascended and descended the heavens? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has bound the waters in a garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His Name? What is the name of His Son if you can tell?
[29] The whole Memra of Eloahh is refined, He is a magen to them that put their trust in Him, and no one has ascended into the heavens if not the one who from the heavens has descended:
[30] The Son of Man who descended in corporeal ethereal bodily form as a Yonah-Dove.
[31] Counsel is mine, and sound wisdom: I am understanding, I have strength.
[32] By me kings reign and princes decree justice: by me princes and nobles rule, even all the judges of the earth:
[33] I love them that love me, and those that seek me early shall find me; riches and honor are with me, yea, durable riches and righteousness.
[34] My fruit is better than gold, yea, better than the finest gold: and my revenue is better than choice silver.
[35] I lead in the Way of Righteousness, in the midst of the paths of judgment, that I may cause those that love me to inherit substance; and I will fill their treasures.
[36] ΙΑΩΑ possessed me in the beginning of His Way, before His works of old: I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the earth was.
[37] When there were no depths I was brought forth: when there were no fountains abounding with water, before the mountains were settled, and before the hills, I was brought forth.
[38] While as yet He had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world: when He prepared the heavens, I was there.
[39] When He set a compass upon the face of the depth, when He established the clouds above, when He strengthened the fountains of the deep, when He gave to the sea His decree that the waters should not pass His commandment, when He appointed the foundations of the earth:
[40] Even then was I beside Him, as if one having been brought up with Him, and I was daily His delight rejoicing always before Him, rejoicing in the habitable portion of His Land: and my delights were with the sons of men.
[41] The next day again stood Yohanan, and there were two out of his talmidim: and watching the Ι̅H traversing the midst, he said, Behold, the Amnos-Lamb of Elohim!

And the Word became lambskin, and has tabernacled among us: Who we have heard: Who we have seen with our eyes: Who we have looked upon, and which our hands have handled, the Word of Life in the lambskin Sefer, whose earlets were pierced coming into the world, being affixed to the Atzei Chayim.

075_corrected_300dpi.jpg

Syria Gallery

Yes, tabernacled among us, in the midst of the great congregation. :)

[01] It is written, In this year of the Yobel you shall return every man to his possession, and again, Any owner who lends to his neighbor shall release it; he shall not exact it of his neighbor or his brother:
[02] For
ΙΑΩΑ your Elohim has proclaimed it the shmita-remission, a sending away, a release.
[03] And it shall come to pass in the last days that Melki Tzedek will return the captives, as it is written in haNavi Yeshayah, To proclaim liberty to the captives.
[04] For he will make their rebellious ones become their captives; and those who belong to Melki Tzedek will rule their former oppressors with a rod of iron, the Spirit of the Torah of Elohim.
[05] For the sons of light are given to Melki Tzedek, for they are his inheritance, and he will cause them to return: he will proclaim liberty to them, to free them from all their iniquities.
[06] And in the Yobel of the apokalypse, after Melki Tzedek has proclaimed liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound, the Yobel shall be proclaimed:
[07] In the tenth of the seventh month, in the year of redemption, the great and wondrous acceptable year of
ΙΑΩΑ, the Yobel shall be proclaimed.
[08] And at that time an atonement shall be made for the sons of light, the sons of Elohim, those who are of the lot of Melki Tzedek: from the heights he will declare in their favor, according to their lots.
[09] For it is the appointed time of the year of the grace of Melki Tzedek, to exalt in the trial, to be lifted up and magnified, and to raise up the holy ones of Elohim by the rule of upright judgment.
[10] As it is written in the Psalm, Elohim stands in the assembly of El; in the midst of the Elohim He judges: how long will you judge unjustly and accept the countenances of the wicked? Selah, (Pause).
[11] I have said, You are Elohim, and all of you are sons of the Most High; but you shall die like men, and fall as one of the sarim-princes:
[12] But then he says, Arise, O Elohim, and judge the earth: for you shall inherit all the nations!
[13] And the understanding concerns Belial and all the unclean spirits of his lot, who were all of them rebels, who turned aside from the commandments of Elohim to commit evil.
[14] And Melki Tzedek shall bring forth the upright judgements of Elohim in this day; and the sons of light shall be freed from the hands of Belial, and from the hands of all the unclean spirits of his lot.
[15] And to his aid shall come all the Elohim of justice and upright judgment; and Melki Tzedek will preside from this day evermore over all bnei Elohim, for he presides over the assembly of the Elohim.
[16] And this is the great day of peace, the day of which Elohim spoke in old time by way of the words of haNavi Yeshayah, saying:
[17] How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of the Messenger who announces peace, the Messenger of good news who announces salvation, saying to Zion, Your Elohim reigns!
[18] The mountains are the prophets; and the greatest of them all is that Prophet like unto Moshe, whom Moshe prophesied was for to come:
[19] That Prophet is the Anointed Messenger who is blessed of Elohim Most High; blessed with Ruach Melki Tzedek, the Teacher of Righteousness who descends from the heavens.
[20] And when Melki Tzedek has come the Anointed Messenger will announce salvation from the heights, for he shall be sent to comfort the afflicted, and to watch over the smitten of Zion, and to instruct us in all the ages of the world in truth and in righteousness.
[21] And he shall turn the wise and circumspect in heart away from Belial with the upright judgments of Elohim, as it is written of him, saying to Zion, Your Elohim reigns!
[22] And to all the congregation of the sons of justice, and the sons of light, to those who establish the covenant, and those who avoid walking in the way of the heathen:
[23] Your Elohim and the head of the great congregation is Ruach Melki Tzedek, who is the only wise head under the Father, and the Father is the Great Head over all.
[24] And Melki Tzedek will free the captives from the hand of Belial, and the shofarim will blow in all the Land: and the great time of trouble shall come, the hour when Miykael shall pass|over.
[25] As it is written of that Prophet like unto Moshe, ΙΑΩΑ your Elohim will raise up unto you a Prophet from the midst of you, of your brethren, like unto me; unto him shall you hearken:
[26] According to all that you desired of ΙΑΩΑ your Elohim in Horeb, in the day of the assembly, saying, Let me not hear again the voice of ΙΑΩΑ my Elohim, neither let me see this great fire any more, that I die not.
[27] And ΙΑΩΑ said to me, They have well spoken that which they have spoken.
[28] I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto you, and will put My words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all whatsoever I shall command him.
[29] And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto My words, which he shall speak in My name, I will require it of him.
[30] For in the day of the assembly the people saw and heard the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and they removed, and stood far off.
[31] And they said unto Moshe, You speak immanu and we will hear: but let not speak immanu Elohim, lest we die!
[32] And Moshe said to the people, Fear not; for Elohim is come to prove you, that His reverential fear may be before your faces always, that you sin not.
[33] But the people stood far off, and Moshe drew near unto the thick darkness where Elohim was:
[34] And ΙΑΩΑ said to Moshe, Thus shall you say unto bnei Yisrael, You have seen that I have spoken with you from the shamayim.
[35] Moreover Moshe says again, These words ΙΑΩΑ spoke unto all your assembly in the mountain, out of the midst of the fire, out of the cloud, and out of the thick darkness, with a great voice: and He added no more, and He wrote them in two tables of stone and delivered them unto me.
[36] And it came to pass, that when you heard the voice out of the midst of the darkness, though the mountain burned with fire, you came near to me, and all the heads of your tribes and your elders:
[37] And you said, Behold, ΙΑΩΑ our Elohim has shown us His glory and His greatness, and we have heard His voice out of the midst of the fire: we have seen this day that Elohim does indeed talk with man and he lives.
[38] Now therefore why should we die? for this great fire will consume us: if we thus hear the voice of ΙΑΩΑ our Elohim any more, then we shall die.
[39] For who is there of all flesh, that has heard the voice of the Living Elohim speaking out of the midst of the fire, as we have, and has lived?
[40] You go near, and hear all that ΙΑΩΑ our Elohim shall say: and you shall speak unto us all that ΙΑΩΑ our Elohim shall speak unto you; and we will hear it, and we will do it.
[41] And ΙΑΩΑ heard the voice of your words when you spoke to me; and ΙΑΩΑ said to me, I have heard the voice of the words of this people which they have spoken unto you: they have well said everything that they have spoken.
[42] מי - Miy shall put within them to have such an heart as this: that they might fear Me, and keep all My commandments always, that it might be well with them,
and with their children forever!

Who is the too-Wonderful Counselor, Prince of Peace, and Mighty El, Who is Immanu·El, Who is that Prophet, Who is to come, Who is the Son of Man, Who is the Arm of
ΙΑΩΑ revealed by Who, and Who is he that comes from Edom with garments died red from Bozrah, and Who took away all Miy question marks: for Who is Miy and Miy is Who and Who is like El. Who was from the beginning: Who we have heard: Who we have seen with our eyes: Who we have looked upon, and which our hands have handled, the Word of Life in the lambskin Sefer, whose earlets were pierced coming into the world, being affixed to the Atzei Chayim: Who we declare unto you!

Who is the Good Wine . . .

:sheep:
 
Last edited:

daqq

Well-known member
Try to imagine six of these all lined up:

Eretz----water-jar-bigger.jpg

http://dqhall.com/israelphotosII/stonejar.htm

The larger above ground cisterns would have likely held about forty gallons of water which is just over four "baths", (one bath is about nine and a half gallons). One measure in the above passage, (KJV "firkin"), is equal to one bath. Thus what the author is telling the reader is that these six stone cisterns contained between two or three baths apiece yet remaining in them. That means, if they were forty gallon cisterns, (four baths maximum), that they were still half to two thirds full with the water for the purification rites of the Yhudim. Does Yeshua tell the attendants to empty them of their contents before filling them to the brims with fresh water? Nope. So we see that the very FIRST miracle performed through Yeshua is this sign, turning water into wine, and wine clearly represents covenants. And yet here the master of ceremonies tells the groom that he had saved the good or best wine for last. And what does the good or best wine consist of? Two or three baths of the water of the purification rites of the Yhudim mixed with about one more bath of the fresh "living" water by the commandment of Yeshua to the attendants who simply did what he commanded them to do.

Luke 5:39
39 And no one having drunk old wine straightway desires new: for he says, "The old is chrestos!"
[more gracious].

1) The number six is the number of creation and of man.
2) The cistern represents the heart or the chest cavity wherein is the heart.
3) The stone cistern represents the heart of stone of the unregenerated man.
4) The the "running water" that was mixed-added to the old represents water of life.
5) The wines obviously represent covenants and in this case they are clearly mixed.
6) The miracles, works, parables, sayings, and idioms of Yeshua all teach doctrine.
7) THIS IS THE VERY FIRST MIRACLE AND SIGN!

Jeremiah 2:12-13
12 Be astonished, O ye heavens, at this, and be horribly afraid, be ye very desolate, says YHWH:
13 for My people have committed two evils; they have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters, and have hewn of themselves cisterns, broken cisterns that can hold no water!


You are the cistern, O man! :Nineveh:

Why do the Rabbis say that the Rock which followed bnei Yisrael in the desert, and brought forth living waters, was like a rolling beehive? While I do not agree with everything in the following link it is enlightening enough: Parashat Bamidbar - New Testament as Midrash. Perhaps it is because there are two Rocks: Ha-Cela, from which came the honey, and Ha-Tsur, from which came the shemen-oil-olive, (Deut 32:13). Moreover, concerning the two Rocks, Ha-Tsur, (Exodus 17:6), and Ha-Cela, (Numbers 20:8), the one is the bedrock while the other is upon the bedrock. The Father is the bedrock-foundation Rock, (Ha-Tsur). It is possible that Moshe thought the Cela represented only bnei Yisrael, (which it does, but also Meshiah), and therefore spoke "inadvisedly" when he called them "rebels" just before he smote the Cela, (Psalm 106:33 says of Moshe, "they provoked his spirit so that he spake unadvisedly with his lips", and that was the very reason he was not allowed to bring the congregation into the land). The lesson for me is that the Father is in Meshiah, the Father is in bnei Yisrael, and the Father is in the congregation. The Cela, (Meshiah, the Son), gives forth the honey in Deut 32:13, and thus, the tradition of the beehive shaped rolling Rock fits the Cela perfectly, and as Paul likewise says:

1 Corinthians 10:1-4
1 For I would not, brethren, have you ignorant, that our fathers were all under the Cloud, and all passed through the Sea:
2 And were all immersed into
[the body of] Moshe in the Cloud and in the Sea: [of Reeds]
3 And all did eat the same spiritual food:
4 And all did drink the same spiritual drink; for they drank of a spiritual Rock that followed them: and the Rock was Meshiah.


And that Rock was shaped like a beehive:


Eretz----water-jar-bigger.jpg


Spring up O well!

Wherefore it is said in the book of the wars of ΙΑΩΑ, What He did at the Sea of Reeds, and in the brooks of Arnon, and at the stream of the brook that goes down to the dwelling of Ar, and lies upon the border of Moab. And from there they came to the well; this is the well of which ΙΑΩΑ had said to Moshe, Gather the people, and I will give them water to drink. Then Yisrael did sing this song, Spring up, O well! Sing unto it! The princes dug the well, the nobles of the people carved it by the direction of the Lawgiver with their staves: from the desert-wilderness, a Gift! (Mattanah).
 

jsanford108

New member
Is it not true, that you believe 'YOUR' Jesus to be an eternal alien life form, who was the creator of the entire cosmos with his father, who was not actually his father as he was one and the same as his father, and that 2,000 years ago he decided to come down to earth where he entered the womb of some supposed every virgin and created for himself a human like body, which was not of the seed of Adam from which all humans have descended?

And did this immortal alien who could not die, dispose of his physical human like body in which he had disguised himself as a human being, then return to his heavenly abode, to be heard of never since?

An alien life form?! I think you are crossing Catholicism and Scientology.

As for His Birth, the Holy Spirit conceived Him, inside the Virgin Mary (she is of Adam's line). He then suffered death and was buried. He then rose, body and spirit, from the dead, and ascended to Heaven.

This is the basic belief, and defining foundation, of all Christianity. If one does not believe in the Virgin Birth, crucifixion, and resurrection of Christ, as savior of the world, then one, by very definition, is not in any form, a Christian.


Sent from my iPhone using TOL
 

S-word

BANNED
Banned
An alien life form?! I think you are crossing Catholicism and Scientology.

As for His Birth, the Holy Spirit conceived Him, inside the Virgin Mary (she is of Adam's line). He then suffered death and was buried. He then rose, body and spirit, from the dead, and ascended to Heaven.

This is the basic belief, and defining foundation, of all Christianity. If one does not believe in the Virgin Birth, crucifixion, and resurrection of Christ, as savior of the world, then one, by very definition, is not in any form, a Christian.


Sent from my iPhone using TOL

jsanford108 wrote...........An alien life form?! I think you are crossing Catholicism and Scientology.

S-word......... So what do you call a life form that had existed for all eternity before the creation of man, if not an Alien?

jsanford108 wrote....... As for His Birth, the Holy Spirit conceived Him, inside the Virgin Mary (she is of Adam's line). He then suffered death and was buried. He then rose, body and spirit, from the dead, and ascended to Heaven.

S-word........Are you saying that because Mary was of the seed of Adam then her son Jesus was under the penalty of death that all human beings inherit from our father Adam, and that his death, could only pay the ransom price for his own life? And when you say he suffered death, do you mean that he, the eternal and immortal spirit actually died, or was it just his human like body that ceased to function in some state in which it could not begin the process of decomposition?

Galatians 4: 29; Yet at that time the child born according to the flesh, (Ishmael) despised and persecuted him (Isaac) who was born according to the promise and the workings/power of the Holy Spirit.

Isaac is a prototype of Jesus and like Jesus, Isaac, the biological son of Abraham, was born of God’s promise according to the workings of the Holy Spirit. Both Isaac and Jesus were the sons of parents who were both sired by the one Father. ‘Terah,’ is the father to both Abraham and Sarah, but from different mothers, while ‘Heli,’ (Alexandra Helios) is the father of both Joseph the son of Heli, and Mary his half sister, and again, by different mothers.*

This Joseph, who is the biological father of Jesus, and is the son of Heli, and the half brother to Mary, should not be confused with Joseph the son of Jacob, who had no sexual relation with Mary until she had given birth to her first born son, 'Jesus', the biological son of her half brother, "Joseph the son of Heli.*

Both Mary and Sarah were informed by an angel that they would become Pregnant and bear the son of God’s promise. Isaac was offered up as a sacrifice by his physical father on the selfsame spot where Jesus was crucified, Jesus was offered up by his spiritual father, who descended upon him in the form of a dove as the heavenly voice was heard to say, ‘ you are my beloved in whom I am well pleased, "TODAY" I have become your Father.” See the more ancient authorities of Luke 3: 22; and Isaac was offered up on the very spot where Jesus was crucified.

In Luke 3: 22; (In place of “Thou art my beloved son in who I am well pleased.”) The following authorities of the second, third, and fourth centuries read, “This day I have begotten thee,” vouched for by Codex D, and the most ancient copies of the old latin (a, b. c. ff.I), by Justin Martyr (AD 140), Clemens Alex, (AD. 190), Methodius (AD. 290), among the Greeks. And among the Latins, Lactaitius (AD 300), Hilary (AD) Juvencus (AD. 330), Faustus (AD. 400) and Augustine.
All these oldest manuscripts were changed completely. They now read, “This is my son in whom I am well pleased.” Whereas the original variant was, “Thou art my Son. This day I have begotten thee.”

jsanford108.........This is the basic belief, and defining foundation, of all Christianity. If one does not believe in the Virgin Birth, crucifixion, and resurrection of Christ, as savior of the world, then one, by very definition, is not in any form, a Christian.

S-word..........I think that what you meant to say here, is that; "If one does not believe in the Virgin Birth, then one, by very definition, is not in any form, a catholic.
 

jsanford108

New member
jsanford108 wrote...........An alien life form?! I think you are crossing Catholicism and Scientology.

S-word......... So what do you call a life form that had existed for all eternity before the creation of man, if not an Alien?

jsanford108 wrote....... As for His Birth, the Holy Spirit conceived Him, inside the Virgin Mary (she is of Adam's line). He then suffered death and was buried. He then rose, body and spirit, from the dead, and ascended to Heaven.

S-word........Are you saying that because Mary was of the seed of Adam then her son Jesus was under the penalty of death that all human beings inherit from our father Adam, and that his death, could only pay the ransom price for his own life? And when you say he suffered death, do you mean that he, the eternal and immortal spirit actually died, or was it just his human like body that ceased to function in some state in which it could not begin the process of decomposition?

Isaac is a prototype of Jesus and like Jesus, Isaac, the biological son of Abraham, was born of God’s promise according to the workings of the Holy Spirit. Both Isaac and Jesus were the sons of parents who were both sired by the one Father. ‘Terah,’ is the father to both Abraham and Sarah, but from different mothers, while ‘Heli,’ (Alexandra Helios) is the father of both Joseph the son of Heli, and Mary his half sister, and again, by different mothers.*

This Joseph, who is the biological father of Jesus, and is the son of Heli, and the half brother to Mary, should not be confused with Joseph the son of Jacob, who had no sexual relation with Mary until she had given birth to her first born son, 'Jesus', the biological son of her half brother, "Joseph the son of Heli.*

Both Mary and Sarah were informed by an angel that they would become Pregnant and bear the son of God’s promise. Isaac was offered up as a sacrifice by his physical father on the selfsame spot where Jesus was crucified, Jesus was offered up by his spiritual father, who descended upon him in the form of a dove as the heavenly voice was heard to say, ‘ you are my beloved in whom I am well pleased, "TODAY" I have become your Father.” See the more ancient authorities of Luke 3: 22; and Isaac was offered up on the very spot where Jesus was crucified.

In Luke 3: 22; (In place of “Thou art my beloved son in who I am well pleased.”) The following authorities of the second, third, and fourth centuries read, “This day I have begotten thee,” vouched for by Codex D, and the most ancient copies of the old latin (a, b. c. ff.I), by Justin Martyr (AD 140), Clemens Alex, (AD. 190), Methodius (AD. 290), among the Greeks. And among the Latins, Lactaitius (AD 300), Hilary (AD) Juvencus (AD. 330)....

S-word..........I think that what you meant to say here, is that; "If one does not believe in the Virgin Birth, then one, by very definition, is not in any form, a catholic.

You lost, friend. My extensive post earlier pretty much deflated you entire argument.

Instead of a rebuttal, you claim Catholics think Christ is an alien.

Then, when I defended the Christian premise of Christ (not being an extraterrestrial), you reply in defense of Christ being an alien? Adding with it some really random (and fringe) claims about Joseph, Isaac, Isaac's location of sacrifice.

All of your additions are not found biblically, or even in early Christian writings. Interesting tactics and theories, to say the least.

Also, all Christians believe in the Virgin Birth. Catholics, Methodists, Baptists, Pentacostals, Fundamentalists, etc. Even cults like JW's and Mormons believe that. And they aren't even Christians. So to say that believing in the Birth makes one Catholic; you are right. But I meant my original intent: Believing in the Virgin Birth is an essential belief of Christianity.


Sent from my iPhone using TOL
 

S-word

BANNED
Banned
You lost, friend. My extensive post earlier pretty much deflated you entire argument.

Instead of a rebuttal, you claim Catholics think Christ is an alien.

Then, when I defended the Christian premise of Christ (not being an extraterrestrial), you reply in defense of Christ being an alien? Adding with it some really random (and fringe) claims about Joseph, Isaac, Isaac's location of sacrifice.

All of your additions are not found biblically, or even in early Christian writings. Interesting tactics and theories, to say the least.

Also, all Christians believe in the Virgin Birth. Catholics, Methodists, Baptists, Pentacostals, Fundamentalists, etc. Even cults like JW's and Mormons believe that. And they aren't even Christians. So to say that believing in the Birth makes one Catholic; you are right. But I meant my original intent: Believing in the Virgin Birth is an essential belief of Christianity.


Sent from my iPhone using TOL

Jsanford108 wrote.........You lost, friend. My extensive post earlier pretty much deflated you entire argument.

S-word..........No my friend, it is you who have been deceived into believing that Jesus was born of the flesh from some supposed ever virgin, who has been lost, and I am here to put you back on the right track.

Jsanford108 wrote..........Instead of a rebuttal, you claim Catholics think Christ is an alien.

S-word..........You catholics believe that the man, before whose image you bow, was an immortal and eternal non physical, non human, life form, which existed even before the Cosmos was created. Now if such a life form came down to earth, without a human like body as a disguise, which body was not of the seed of Adam, what do you think the world would call that life form? Answer------An Alien.

Jsanford108........Then, when I defended the Christian premise of Christ (not being an extraterrestrial), you reply in defense of Christ being an alien?

S-word.........So, you believe that before he created the cosmos, he was a terrestrial being, was he? Hmmm I can't imagine a terrestrial being existing before the cosmos was created. Now then, can you tell us all what you would call an immortal and eternal, non physical, non human, life form that existed before the creation of the entire cosmos?

jsandford108 wrote.........Adding with it some really random (and fringe) claims about Joseph, Isaac, Isaac's location of sacrifice.

S-word...........So you reject the scriptures which state that Jesus was the son of Joseph the son of Heli/Alexander Helios, and that Isaac was born of God’s promise according to the workings/power of the Holy Spirit, and you reject the fact that Mt Moriah, where Abraham offered his son Isaac, and the Temple Mount where Jesus was crucified, are the same place, do you?

Jsanford108..........All of your additions are not found biblically, or even in early Christian writings. Interesting tactics and theories, to say the least.

S-word...........I suppose others, who like yourself have never studied the scripture, might believe as you do.

Jsanford108 wrote..........Also, all Christians believe in the Virgin Birth. Catholics, Methodists, Baptists, Pentacostals, Fundamentalists, etc. Even cults like JW's and Mormons believe that. And they aren't even Christians. So to say that believing in the Birth makes one Catholic; you are right. But I meant my original intent: Believing in the Virgin Birth is an essential belief of Christianity.

S-word...........The virgin birth might be an essential belief of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine and all her denominational daughters, who were spawned of her lying spirit, before breaking away from their mother body, to establish families of their own, after the Roman church of Constantine had lost its power to ban all other religious institutions.

From the book, “Jesus The Evidence,” by Ian Wilson. P. 144.

The Middle Ages, for the Jews at least, began with the advent to power of Constantine the Great. He was the first Roman Emperor to issue laws which radically limited the rights of the Jews as citizens of the Roman Empire, a right conferred on them by Caracalla in 212 AD. As (The so-called Christianity of Constantine’s church) grew in power it influenced the emperors to limit further the civil and political rights of the Jews.

But if times were again difficult for the Jews, for the Christian Gnostics and other fringe groups they were impossible. The books of Arius and his sympathizers were ordered to be burnt, and a reign of terror proclaimed for all those who did not conform with the new official (So-called) Christian line.

"Understand now by this present statute, Novatians, Valentinians, Marcionites, Paulinians, you who are called Cataphrygians. . . . with what a tissue of lies and vanities, with what destructive and venomous errors, your doctrines are inextricably woven! We give you warning . . . .Let none of you presume, from this time forward, to meet in congregations. To prevent this, we command that you be deprived of all the houses in which you have been accustomed to meet . . . . and that these house should be handed over immediately to the catholic/ i.e. universal church."

Within a generation, hardly leaving a trace of their existence for posterity, the great majority of these groups simply died away as successive Christian emperors reiterated the politics that Constantine had pursued.


But the virgin birth is definitely not the belief of those who accept the Jesus as taught by the apostles, and not ‘YOUR’ Jesus who was taught by one of your Saints who said; “It would be ridiculous to imagine that the redeemer, in order to exist, had the usual needs of man. He only took food and ate it in order that we should not teach about him in a Docetic fashion."

And in another instance, who, in support of the great lie, speaks of the time that some imaginary midwife, (Which is not supported by scripture) who was supposed to be at the birth of Jesus, told some woman by the name Salome, that the mother was still a virgin after the birth and that her hymen was still intact, (Which is not supported by scripture) and that this supposed Salome, stuck her finger into the mother's vagina to check, and her hand immediately withered up, but the baby Jesus reached out and touched her hand and healed it.
His teachings were believed by the Roman Church right up until the 17th century, when the church finally kicked him out and stripped him of his sainthood, but it was too late, the filthy lies had been entrenched in the minds of the gullible.

Constantine appointed his mother Helena as Augusta, and gave her unlimited access to the imperial treasury in order to locate the relics of early Judeo-Christian times.

According to the traditions of the Church of Constantine, Mary and her child rested in a cave, called the Milk Grotto (la Gruta de la Leche), near the place where today stands the Church of the Nativity (la Iglesia de la Natividad). There, (Or so it is said) their supposed Virgin Mary breastfed the child. A drop of milk fell on a stone of the cave, and the stone turned white. During the early centuries, this white rock, diluted in water, took the appearance of milk and was used as a religious relic.

Both Christians and Muslims believe scrapings from the stones in the grotto boost the quantity of a mother’s milk and enhance fertility. Mothers usually mix it in their drinking water; would-be mothers place the MAGICAL rock under their mattress.

Go to the church of the Nativity in Bethlehem of Judaea, which was originally financed and built by Constantine, the founder of the Catholic church and his mother Hellena, who have both been deified as saints by the church that they established in 325 AD.

The church of the Nativity, was originally built over the Milk Grotto, which was discovered by Hellena, of which it is said, that just after the wise men were supposed to have left Bethlehem where Hellena reckoned that they had visited the BABY in the manger, (Which, according to the scriptures, they didn’t) Herod’s men came storming in, butchering all the boys who were two years and below, while Mary hid in a cave trying to keep her baby quite by breast feeding, him and she happened to spill some milk on the rocks which then miraculously turned white. (or so the story of Helena goes.)

Today, any woman who is having trouble falling pregnant or lactating, can go there and pray to their heavenly queen, who they believe is the mother of God and the co-redeemer of the human race, who was supposedly taken bodily into heaven after her death and before her body began to decompose, and for the price of a small bag of white dust from those MIRACULOUS rocks, they can be cured.

Immediately after that, according to the belief of their St Hellena, whose belief was in accordance to the supposedly infallible teachings of the church that was established by her non Christian son, the holy family fled from Bethlehem of Judaea into the land of Egypt. But not according to the word of God.

Not a bad story, hey? What a pity that it is not supported by the scriptures, which states in Luke 2: that the BABY was born in a stable and while it was in the manger, the shepherds came to see the BABY, (No mention of the wise men) eight days after the birth of the BABY, it was circumcised and then named Jesus.

Luke 2: 22; The time came for Joseph and Mary to perform the ceremony of purification as the law of Moses Commanded.

When, according to the law of Moses, was the ceremony of purification to be performed?

Leviticus 12:3-4; Concerning a male child; "On the eighth day the child shall be circumcised, then 33 days later, the mother will perform the ceremony of purification."

Then 33 days after the baby Jesus had been circumcised, Mary openly carried the BABY the few miles from Bethlehem to the temple in Jerusalem, (Still no mention of the wise men or the slaughter of the innocents) and there, In the temple at Jerusalem, Mary performed the ceremony of Purification.

According to Leviticus 12: 6-8; the woman performing the ceremony of purification, was to offer to the priest, a one year old unblemished lamb for a burnt offering and a pigeon or dove for a sin offering, then in verse 8, it is said that if the woman could not afford a lamb, she should bring two doves or two pigeons, one for a burnt offering the other for a sin offering, which was the offering of Mary.

This plainly reveals that she had not yet received the gifts of Gold, frankincense and Myrrh: If she had, she could have afforded and would have offered the one year old unblemished lamb, but we see that she couldn’t afford a lamb, as she could only offer a pair of doves or two pigeons. Luke 2: 24.

Luke 2: 39; After the ceremony of purification was completed, and when Joseph and Mary had finished everything that was required of them by the Law of the Lord, they returned to THEIR home in Nazareth which is only about 2 miles from Bethlehem of Galilee, which town today, is call ‘Beitlahm’ and is about 4 miles from the beautiful Hellenistic city of Sepphoris, a burgeoning Greco-Roman metropolis boasting upward of thirty thousand inhabitants.

It was to their 'HOUSE' in Nazareth that the wise men came to do obedience to the child, who had to travel from their country in the east, which would have taken them three to four months.

You must continue to believe Your saint Helena and the teachings of her son's Church. While I will continue to believe the words of the Lord.
 

S-word

BANNED
Banned
jsanford108 seems to abandoned this thread. Was it getting too hot for you mate?

Afraid of the terrible persecution by the universal church against any and all who would indulge in the Pagan practice of the scientific study into the workings of the universe, which results of that unholy act of heresy challenged the authority of the church and brought into disrepute their sacred teachings, such as, the fact that their flat earth that was the centre around which revolved the entire universe that was created only some ten thousand years ago and was created in six literal 24 hour days etc. It was only when he was on his death- bed that Nicolaus Copernicus dared to publish his sun-centred model of the universe.

And Galileo Galilei, who was constantly in conflict with the church, skillfully arguing with the church authorities for Copernicus views, finally died under house arrest as a prisoner of the Inquisition.

During the Inquisition, the Roman universal church of Constantine killed millions, in order to suppress any and all opposition to her false doctrines, while confiscating the material wealth of its victims.The Roman universal church of Constantine have tortured, crippled, burned, murdered, and imprisioned millions of people. Which you believe was under the influence of the Holy Spirit.

It was in the late 1300s John Wycilf translated the scriptures from the Latin. About 44 years after his death, your Roman universal church dug his buried bones up and burned them calling him an arch-heretick.

Then in the 1500's William Tyndale wanted to translate the Bible into English in order that the average person had access to the word of God.But he was refused approval from the Roman church of Constantine, so he was forced to do the work of the Lord without your mothers approval, translating the Bible, while on the run in Europe.

He was eventually captured, and condemned by your church before they executed him in 1536. It is because of men like, Tyndale and Wycliffe, that we have the scriptures today.If the Roman universal church of Emperor Constantine had its way, we'd still be living in the dark ages, and like our atheist friends on this forum, we would be totally ignorant to the truths as revealed in the Holy Scriptures, and enslaved to your pope and his paedophile priests.
 

daqq

Well-known member
And of course the seventh water-jar is found in John 4:28, that is, the woman herself; for she leaves the water-jar and becomes herself the cistern, having the Testimony and Living Water of Messiah in her own cistern-cavity: and she runs back into the city and shares the Living Water of the Word with the men of the city, concerning Messiah, who had told her all things ever she did, (the five were fallen, the one was, John 4:18, Rev 17:10). :)
 

S-word

BANNED
Banned
And of course the seventh water-jar is found in John 4:28, that is, the woman herself; for she leaves the water-jar and becomes herself the cistern, having the Testimony and Living Water of Messiah in her own cistern-cavity: and she runs back into the city and shares the Living Water of the Word with the men of the city, concerning Messiah, who had told her all things ever she did, (the five were fallen, the one was, John 4:18, Rev 17:10). :)

And what have you been smoking mate?

Who was speaking to the woman? The man Jesus, who admitted the words that he spoke were not his, but were the words of the Lord that he was commanded to say, Jesus, who was chosen from among the Israelites to speak in the name of the Lord , who had filled him with his spirit/his words, when the heavenly voice was heard to say, "You are my Son, 'THIS DAY' I have begotten thee.

Or were they the words of the Lord who spoke through his earthly obedient host body?
 

daqq

Well-known member
[Forty Days and Forty Nights]

[01] Prayer of Moshe, man of the Elohim: O Adonai, You have been our dwelling place in the generations and to generations.
[02] Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever You had formed the earth and world, even from everlasting to everlasting, You are El.
[03] You turn a mortal-enosh into crushed powder, and say, Return, O sons of Adam!
[04] For a thousand years in Your sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.
[05] You carry them away as with a flood, while they sleep, and in the morning they spring up as grass.
[06] In the morning it blossoms and sprouts up, in the evening it is blunted and withering.
[07] For we are consumed in Your displeasure, and in the heat of Your anger we tremble.
[08] You have set our iniquities before You, our secrets by the light of Your countenance.
[09] For all our days pass away in Your fury, and we finish out our years as thunder rolls away.
[10] The days of our years are seventy years, and if in strength they may be eighty years; yet their strength is toil and vanity, for it is soon cut off, and we fly away.
[11] Who knows the power of Your fury? and from the fear of Your passion, to count the days?
[12] Manifest Your right hand to me, so that our hearts may come unto Wisdom.
[13] How long to return, O
ΙΑΩΑ? and how long until You show pity upon Your servants?
[14] Oh satisfy us early with Your mercies, so that we may rejoice and be glad all our days.
[15] Make us cheerful according to the days You have afflicted us, and according to the years wherein we have seen evil, make us glad.
[16] Let Your work appear unto Your servants, and let Your glory appear unto their sons:
[17] And let the splendor of Adonai our Elohim be upon us, and let it be You who ordains for us the actions of our hands: yea, let it be You who establishes the works of our hands.

[Forty Days and Forty Nights]

[18] He who dwells in the covert of the Most High — In the shadow of Shaddai He abides.
[19] I will say of Yah | He is my refuge! And in my fortress, my Elohim, will I trust.
[20] Surely the
ΩΑ will deliver You from the snare of the entangler, from the ruinous pestilence:
[21] With His feathers He covers You, and beneath His wings You do trust — His truth is a shield and a buckler.
[22] You shall not be fearful of the terror by night, nor of the arrow that flies by day:
[23] Nor of the pestilence that walks in darkness; nor of the ruin of destruction at noonday.
[24] A thousand shall fall at Your side, and a myriad at Your right hand; but unto You it shall not come near.
[25] Not with Your eyes shall you behold, but the reward of the wicked shall You see.
[26] For You, O Yah | He is my refuge! You have made the Most High Your habitation.
[27] There shall no evil befall You, neither shall any plague come near Your dwelling place:
[28] For He shall give His Angels charge concerning You, to guard You in all Your ways.
[29] They shall bear You up in their hands, lest You dash Your foot against a stone.
[30] You shall tread upon the serpent and the cobra, the lion and the dragon shall You trample.
||
[31] Because He has set His love upon Me, therefore I will deliver Him: I will set Him on High, for He has known My name.
[32] He shall call upon Me, and I will answer Him. I am with Him in trouble: I will deliver Him, and honor Him.
[33] In length of days I will satiate Him to the full. And I will show Him My salvation.

:sheep:
 
Last edited:

daqq

Well-known member
And what have you been smoking mate?

Who was speaking to the woman? The man Jesus, who admitted the words that he spoke were not his, but were the words of the Lord that he was commanded to say, Jesus, who was chosen from among the Israelites to speak in the name of the Lord , who had filled him with his spirit/his words, when the heavenly voice was heard to say, "You are my Son, 'THIS DAY' I have begotten thee.

Or were they the words of the Lord who spoke through his earthly obedient host body?

John 4:25-26
25 λεγει αυτω η γυνη οιδα οτι μεσσιας ερχεται ο λεγομενος χριστος οταν ελθη εκεινος αναγγελει ημιν απαντα
26 λεγει αυτη ο
Ι̅H εγω ειμι ο λαλων σοι

John 4:25-26
25 The woman says to him, I know that an Anointed one comes speaking the Meshiah: when that one is come he will announce to us all things.
26 The
Ι̅H says to her, I am the One speaking to you. [The Voice entering into your ears].

John 6:62-63
62 What then if you should behold the Son of Man ascending up to where He was before?
63 It is the Spirit that gives life; the flesh profits nothing: the words that I speak to you, they are Spirit, and they are Life.
 
Last edited:

Wick Stick

Well-known member
Boy, this thread is a hard read. Too many things going on.

jsanford - You appear to be out of your depth. You've said a few things that are factually inaccurate, and misunderstood your opponent's post several times, offering rebuttals that are not apropos to what was said.

S-word - It takes a certain amount of bravery (or is it hubris?) to clearly set forth everything you believe, particularly when it is so far from mainstream. I can appreciate that. However, you are very clearly OFF TOPIC with it in this post. Why not make a thread of your own? I'd be happy to discuss it... but not to the detriment of this thread.

Daqq - The OP was interesting, but it sure went off the rails quickly after that! It seems to me...

Water is emblematic of the word (which also is spirit).

Jesus did not come to destroy the Law and Prophets (that old water that was already in the cistern), but to πληρῶσαι, that is to fill it up. So, pour in some new water, and suddenly it's not just water, but wine.

And wine is emblematic of blood, which also is life.
 

S-word

BANNED
Banned
John 6:62-63
62 What then if you should behold the Son of Man ascending up to where He was before?
63 It is the Spirit that gives life; the flesh profits nothing: the words that I speak to you, they are Spirit, and they are Life.

And whose words were they that said; "The words that I speak to you, (Through my chosen earthly host body)
are spirit and life."

Who was it that said, concerning the body of Jesus the obedient servant of the Lord; "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up again?"

If they were the actual words of the man Jesus, then we could expect to see in scripture that Jesus raised himself from death, But if they were the words of the Lord, as spoken through his obedient servant Jesus, then Scripture would reveal that it was the Lord speaking through Jesus.

Acts 17: 31; For He (The Lord) has fixed a day in which he will judge the whole world with justice by means of a MAN he has CHOSEN. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising that MAN from death.

Acts 5: 30; The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom you slew and hanged on a tree.

Acts 13: 30; But God raised him from the dead: and he was seen many days of them which came up with him from Galilee, etc.

1st Corinthians 6: 14; And God has both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.

2nd Corinthians 1: 9; But we had the sentence of death in ourselves, that we should not trust in ourselves, but in God which raiseth the dead.

2nd Corinthians 4: 14; knowing that he who raised the Lord Jesus will raise us also with Jesus and bring us with you into his presence.

So again I ask you; "Were these the words of the man Jesus, or the words of the Lord, 'Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up again?'"

Deuteronomy 18: 18; “I will send them a prophet like you from among their own people. I will tell him what to say, and he will tell the people everything I command. He will speak in my name and I will punish anyone who refuses to obey him, etc.

This is verified by Peter who says in reference to the man Jesus in Acts 3: 22; “For Moses said; "The Lord your God will send you a prophet, just as he sent me, and he will be one of your own people, etc."

Jesus admits that he spoke not one word on his own authority, but only that which he was commanded to say by our Lord God and saviour, who chose him as the one to speak in his name, “Who I Am,” and Jesus says in John 5: 24; “Whoever hear my words (The words that he was commanded to say) and believes in “HIM” who sent me, has eternal life.

John 14: 24; “And the word which you hear is not mine, but the Father’s who sent me.

Did the people of his day believe that he was the Lord, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The God of our ancestors? No, they did not, for on the day of his triumphant entry into Jerusalem, the people escorting him cried out, "BLESSED IS HE WHO COMES IN THE NAME OF THE LORD” Verifying that they believed Jesus to be the one that God had promised through Moses, that he would choose from among the Israelites, and send to the people to speak in his name.
 

daqq

Well-known member
Boy, this thread is a hard read. Too many things going on.

jsanford - You appear to be out of your depth. You've said a few things that are factually inaccurate, and misunderstood your opponent's post several times, offering rebuttals that are not apropos to what was said.

S-word - It takes a certain amount of bravery (or is it hubris?) to clearly set forth everything you believe, particularly when it is so far from mainstream. I can appreciate that. However, you are very clearly OFF TOPIC with it in this post. Why not make a thread of your own? I'd be happy to discuss it... but not to the detriment of this thread.

Daqq - The OP was interesting, but it sure went off the rails quickly after that! It seems to me...

Water is emblematic of the word (which also is spirit).

Jesus did not come to destroy the Law and Prophets (that old water that was already in the cistern), but to πληρῶσαι, that is to fill it up. So, pour in some new water, and suddenly it's not just water, but wine.

And wine is emblematic of blood, which also is life.

Hi WS, to your comments addressed to me, amen. As for S-word I asked him several times to start another thread; so what he has done here to this thread is no doubt intentional. However what can you do when someone just wants to show hatred without a cause? It was not like he and I had been talking in many other threads before this one. He simply chose this thread to ram his theories into the thread for reasons I can only imagine. And why he would not want his own thread for such a huge amount of information I really have no clue. As you might have seen I ignored him until he finally addressed something I posted at the bottom of the previous page. I do not generally report people because I know it would not do me any good here anyway, (and it really isn't "how I roll", lol). :idunno: :)
 

S-word

BANNED
Banned
Hi WS, to your comments addressed to me, amen. As for S-word I asked him several times to start another thread; so what he has done here to this thread is no doubt intentional. However what can you do when someone just wants to show hatred without a cause? It was not like he and I had been talking in many other threads before this one. He simply chose this thread to ram his theories into the thread for reasons I can only imagine. And why he would not want his own thread for such a huge amount of information I really have no clue. As you might have seen I ignored him until he finally addressed something I posted at the bottom of the previous page. I do not generally report people because I know it would not do me any good here anyway, (and it really isn't "how I roll", lol). :idunno: :)

Read Post #77.
 
Top