jsanford108
New member
S-word..........My only quote from the Old Testament in my previous post to you, was Genesis 5: 23; “Enoch was 365 and had spent his life in fellowship with God when he disappeared because God had Taken him,”and if you deny that Enoch was taken by God at the age of 365 and was translated in order that he should never see death, as revealed in the NT, then you deny the Word of God.
Jsanfore108..........Two quick things that come to mind are Jude being a half-brother of Jesus (false: there is literally no evidence to even vaguely support this),
S-word..........Matthew 13: 55; Isn’t he the carpenter’s son? And isn’t Mary his mother, and aren’t James, Joseph, Simon and Jude his brothers. And aren’t all his sisters living here?
KJV; Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. The Amplified version, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. Living New Testament, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. RSV, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. GNB Catholic Study Edition, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James. The Jerusalem Bible, Jude 1: 1; Jude the brother of James.
I think that there is enough evidence there to prove that Jude is the brother of James, who Paul states is the brother of Jesus, and it was James the brother of Jesus and half brother to Jude, who was the first to sit upon the Episcopal throne of the church of the Circumcision, Simon who is also a son of the carpenter, was the one who succeeded his brother James as the leader of the Jerusalem church of Jesus.
It is from the writings of Josephus the historian, Eusebius, and Hegessippus, we learn that in 62 AD, James was murdered at the instigation of one of that same Sadducee sect responsible for the death of his brother Jesus, and that he was subsequently succeeded by Simon, (who was another half brother to Jesus.)
Simeon a half-brother to Jesus, was succeeded by 13 other Bishops of the circumcision, among who, several others, like Simeon and James, appear to have been blood relatives of Jesus. In 132 AD, with the second Jewish revolt, the line was extinguished. Epiphanius of Salamis, in his Panarion, mentions Judah Kyriakos, the great grandson of Jude, as the last Jewish Bishop of Jerusalem that lived beyond Bar Kokhba’s revolt.
Hegesippus, mentions descendant of Jude living in the reign of Domitian, 81-96 AD.
In his book, “Historia Ecclesiae” Eusebius wrote; “But when the same Domitian had commanded the descendants of David should be slain, an ancient tradition says that some of the heretics brought accusations against the descendants of Jude (Said to have been a brother of the saviour according to the flesh) on the grounds that they were of the lineage of David and were related to Christ himself.
Hegesippus relates these facts in the following words; “Of the family of the Lord there were still living the grandchildren of Jude (The Twin) who is said to have been the Lord’s brother according to the flesh.
It was not uncommon in those days, for a Jewish Galilean to have three names, one in Hebrew, one in Greek and one in Aramaic
Jude=Hebrew, Thomas=Tau’ma, the Aramiac for twin, is also called Didymus, which is the Greek for twin, he is Thomas/twin, Didymus/twin, Jude, the half-brother of Jesus and the son of the carpenter. A local tradition of eastern Syria identifies the Apostle Jude with Jude Thomas who was called ‘The Twin’ also known as Thomas (Aramaic), Didymus (Greek), and Jude (Hebrew.)
Knowing that in ART, Thomas Didymus Jude, is depicted with a, carpenters rule and square: In "The Acts of Thomas, sometimes called by its full name, "The Acts of Judas Thomas," 2nd-3rd century CE, "The Apostles cast lots as to where they should go, and to Thomas, brother to Jesus fell India. Thomas was taken to King Goddophares the ruler of Indo-Pathian Kingdom as an architect and carpenter by Habban.”
I would like to go deeper into this subject for you, but I realise that you are as yet, not really interested in the truths as revealed in scripture, but more interested in defending the lies and rubbish, which are the spirit/words of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine, the next subject that you wish to discuss.
Jsanford108 wrote..........and the Roman Catholic Church (many flaws in your history here, one being Constantine starting it, another being their rejection of early Christian writings when they are the only ones who keep them dear).
But first I need a cup of tea and a sandwich, then, “I’ll be Baaack.”
BTW, you don't need to apologise yet for saying, "There is literally no evidence to even vaguely support the suggestion that Jude the brother of James is related to Jesus."
I never denied Enoch being called to Heaven. I don't honestly know why you keep mentioning that.
Yes, Christ is a "carpenter's son." However, recall that Joseph was not Christ's paternal father. So to utilize "carpenter's son" as a literal example of genealogy is false. And no, Christ had no other brothers or sisters. Simple examination of the New Testament genealogies is proof of this. James' father was not Joseph. Nor Joseph, Simon, or Jude. All have fathers who aren't Joseph. The only attempt you could maintain at an argument here is that Mary, mother of Christ, is their maternal link. However, this would go against a plethora of logic, especially in the times of Christ and His apostles.
So why do the Scriptures say brother? And even the writings of Early Christians? A simple education in Aramic and Greek would reveal that the ancient writers use the same terms for "brother" as "cousin" or "relatives." They did not utilize the various titles that we have today. Likewise, when we say "Brother in Christ," that does not make us physically related, does it? It is always interesting to see the mental attempts utilized in disproving rather simple fact (Christ being the only son of Mary/Joseph) and extrapolating rather ridiculous falsehoods (Like Jesus having literal brothers).
So let us go deeper into Scripture. Lead this conversation where you want to discuss. It is always interesting to see how one such as yourself examines Scripture.
As for the Catholic question, I will reply to that post next.