Clete's argument is not absolute proof and does not incorporate perspective.
--Dave
The earth is flat and we never went to the moon--Part II
- Thread starter DFT_Dave
- Start date
- Status
Clete's argument is not absolute proof and does not incorporate perspective.
--Dave
I have said a number of times that the height and size of the sun would comply with perspective.
--Dave
In this video we see the sun come out of the horizon at the 1:42:00 mark of this video.
See how tiny that sun is in the distance then compare it to how much larger it is when it's close in the other videos.
Here is visual proof that the sun changes size in relation to perspective of a flat earth.
The sun appears to be moving over a flat earth, yet we are supposed to believe that the earth is moving and the balloon is being pulled with it, although this is not what we see.
--Dave
No Dave, this is not proof. Proof is for you to go get a piece of welding glass and mark with width of the sun on the glass every hour for a day. Proof is doing this one day per month for a year. Proof is taking pictures of your markings and the sun that clearly show the sun changes size according to the laws of perspective. Quit posting videos and go outside and DO something!
Right Divider
Body part
Another silly, over-saturated, NON-proof video.
Dave, you are so self-deceived that it's amazing.
Same story over and over.
From high altitude we see a flat straight horizon, fish eye distortion of a curve is well known.
We see an immovable earth with moving small close sun with bright hot spot directly underneath it.
But we're all crazy lunatics if we don't we don't accept the opposite of what we see.
--Dave
In review
A flat motionless earth with flat straight horizons is seen:
1. From everywhere on earth
2. From all high altitude balloons
Flat motionless earth is the cosmology of:
1. All ancient cultures up to the beginning of Greek philosophy
2. The Bible taken literally from beginning to end
That the earth is motionless was proven by experiments with light in the 1800's by the:
1. Michelson–Morley experiment
2. Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment
3. Sagnac experiment
The modern flat earth movement has emerged because of:
1. The Nikon P900 camera showing us what should be hidden by the curved earth
2. The internet/you-tube where anyone can see presentations for flat earth
3. The failure of NASA to get back to the moon and evidence that we never went there in the first place
--Dave
A flat motionless earth with flat straight horizons is seen:
1. From everywhere on earth
2. From all high altitude balloons
Flat motionless earth is the cosmology of:
1. All ancient cultures up to the beginning of Greek philosophy
2. The Bible taken literally from beginning to end
That the earth is motionless was proven by experiments with light in the 1800's by the:
1. Michelson–Morley experiment
2. Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment
3. Sagnac experiment
The modern flat earth movement has emerged because of:
1. The Nikon P900 camera showing us what should be hidden by the curved earth
2. The internet/you-tube where anyone can see presentations for flat earth
3. The failure of NASA to get back to the moon and evidence that we never went there in the first place
--Dave
M&M returned an Earth orbital velocity of 8 kilometers per second.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Right Divider
Body part
Learn a little about this Dave: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_parallax
Not one single word of this is at all relevant to the argument, David.
I am really starting to think that you are in fact stupid.
I don't care how far away the FET thinks the Sun is! It can't be two different distances away at the same time, you blithering idiot!
Perspective is not relevant to the argument and it is 1000% total proof that the Earth CANNOT be flat - period.
There are two and only two avenues of attack against the argument.
You can challenge the veracity of the data we (i.e. people participating in this thread) collected.
You can challenge the veracity of the Pythagorean Theorem.
Until that is done, any arguments about the idea that the Bible teaches a flat Earth is an argument that the Bible is false.
I had been engaging you logically with no name calling on some of these very topics, and you ignored me. It wasn't a very nice thing to do to treat someone like that who was respecting the conversation.
I have been back to work lately and not had time to post as much as I would like so I have to focus on one argument, or the line of argument, that focuses on the horizon.
--Dave
- Status