In principle, perhaps, but in actual practice, it wouldn't work out that way.
If the government actually punished criminals the way it should, there'd be no such thing as nine year old rapists/murderers/sociopaths. It just wouldn't ever happen.
In principle, perhaps, but in actual practice, it wouldn't work out that way.
If the government actually punished criminals the way it should, there'd be no such thing as nine year old rapists/murderers/sociopaths. It just wouldn't ever happen.
They've abandoned the spiritual/moral foundation upon which our civil society was built.They've forgotten the "why" for such laws.
They've abandoned the spiritual/moral foundation upon which our civil society was built.
History teaches us that it is not the society that reflects it's laws but the laws that reflect the society. The singular exception is when God gave human government (i.e. law) to mankind after the flood. Since then, it has been an exercise of man deteriorating the law until the society collapses and the remaining population then restoring laws that rebuild society which then degrades the law until collapse and round and round the wheels on the bus go. There's nothing new under the Sun.
I can't see how that could possibly be debated. It's completely obvious.As fas as I'm concerned, our nation is in the midst of such a collapse.
I can't see how that could possibly be debated. It's completely obvious.
Incidentally, it is also not stoppable. Barring divine intervention, western civilization will succumb to pressures both from within and without. The low birth rate alone makes the society unsustainable, never mind our near complete lack of moral foundation upon which to raise the children we do have. Left to itself, the situation is quite entirely hopeless, though it may yet be several generations away from total collapse.
Things ebb and flow. Things are much better now than they were even three years ago. Perhaps they'll continue to improve for some time or maybe we'll lurch back toward near total depravity.I've heard a few people suggest ways to fix our country.
But you can't put new wine into old wineskins.
Additionally, you cant put new wine into broken wineskins. And our nation is completely broken.
I don't think they forgot. We went from the greatest generation to the worst (Boomers). And I believe they just don't care. They abandoned what they know is right, and don't give a damn.They've abandoned the spiritual/moral foundation upon which our civil society was built.
It's more fundamental than that. Our decline runs deeper than a single generation forgetting what is right. The more urban our society has become, the more it has drifted from the moral structure that once held it together. Families who lived on farms were woven into an economic and relational fabric that reinforced virtue. A father was not only a parent but the first and often primary employer. Children were not merely offspring, but were contributors to the household economy. Life itself created incentives to maintain strong, healthy, disciplined family bonds. Once society was liberated from the physical labor that sustained agrarian life, it was also liberated from the natural need for families, and the foundation of civil society began to erode.I don't think they forgot. We went from the greatest generation to the worst (Boomers). And I believe they just don't care. They abandoned what they know is right, and don't give a damn.
In 1860, about 1.26% of the US population owned slaves (per Gemini).Ah yes, the first century of the US. Let's go back to that, women don't need to vote, we should all own slaves because they will be needed to clean up the horse manure in the streets, we can all use candles to read, no modern medicine etc.
That is the metric you want to use? The 1860 census counted 3.9 million slaves, about 12.5% of the US population. Sorry if my comment led you astray, it was meant to point out that Clete's desire to return to the 1800's is misguided.In 1860, about 1.26% of the US population owned slaves (per Gemini).
You said "we should ALL own slaves".That is the metric you want to use? The 1860 census counted 3.9 million slaves, about 12.5% of the US population. Sorry if my comment led you astray, it was meant to point out that Clete's desire to return to the 1800's is misguided.
I'm not sure the Good Ol' Days were all that great.
Mea culpa, but that time period that Clete seems to like had almost 4 million people enslaved in the US which is the more important part to considerYou said "we should ALL own slaves".
My point was that very FEW people (less than 2%) actually owned slaves in 1860.
It was imperfect, as every era is, yet it was also far freer and far more just than what we tolerate today. The result was the single greatest expansion of personal liberty, economic prosperity, lifespan, innovation, and overall human flourishing that the world had ever witnessed. The modern world is still coasting on the momentum created by that century.Ah yes, the first century of the US. Let's go back to that,"
Quite so! Neither should men!women don't need to vote,
Stupidity. That is a childish caricature. If this is the level of argument you find persuasive, you should ask yourself why.we should all own slaves because they will be needed to clean up the horse manure in the streets,
If America had remained as free, as socially cohesive, and as economically unshackled as it was in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, the level of technology and standard of living you would enjoy today would exceed anything you can imagine. The only reason you have the modern world at all is because earlier generations built a foundation strong enough that modern political decay has not yet fully destroyed it.we can all use candles to read, no modern medicine etc.