the church

[SaulToPaul 2]

I would say that you can interpret it, but you can't teach your private interpretation as if it's the truth, and especially not that it's what the Catholic faith believes, unless your own interpretation is in agreement with what the Church teaches. Else, you're leading people astray.

 

[chrysostom]

But I haven't seen where Chrysostom teaches Revelation views as if they are what the Church teaches.

Maybe I missed that though.

I have often said
-the church has no official view of the apocalypse
-what I present are my views
-they are not inconsistent with church teachings

 

[Wick Stick]

I thought the RCC's official stance on Revelation was:

"NOT IT!"

 

[chrysostom]

I thought the RCC's official stance on Revelation was:

"NOT IT!"

is that what you found on the internet?

 

[Wick Stick]

is that what you found on the internet?

Nope... that was a joke. It wasn't for you, and was at the expense of your church, so I can see why you wouldn't find it funny.

FWIW, I'm not even anti-catholic. I just like to poke everyone in the ribs from time to time. Consider yourself poked.

Jarrod

 

[chrysostom]

Nope... that was a joke. It wasn't for you, and was at the expense of your church, so I can see why you wouldn't find it funny.

FWIW, I'm not even anti-catholic. I just like to poke everyone in the ribs from time to time. Consider yourself poked.

Jarrod

you really know how to have fun

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

you really know how to have fun

Invite him to a Friday night Fish Fry.

 

[Wick Stick]

Invite him to a Friday night Fish Fry.

At least in his church they get real wine.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

At least in his church they get real wine.

And spirited softball games versus the nuns.

 

[Nihilo]

I have often said
-the church has no official view of the apocalypse
-what I present are my views
-they are not inconsistent with church teachings

That's what I thought.

 

[Right Divider]

I have often said
-the church has no official view of the apocalypse
-what I present are my views
-they are not inconsistent with church teachings

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative

A real double negative is when you lose one brown scapular and get too fat for your back up scapular.

 

[TulipBee]

that is not true
-are you just repeating what they told you?

It's an added tradition authorized by the papal system that you use secondary sources instead. You just gave us a link to secondary resources. We have be getting alternative information from the RCC for years. If you're ordianed, you shoud know better

 

[chrysostom]

I have often said
-the church has no official view of the apocalypse
-what I present are my views
-they are not inconsistent with church teachings

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_negative

it would be wrong to say my views on the apocalypse are consistent with church teachings
-it is not what the church teaches
-it is accurate to say they are not inconsistent with church teachings
-they don't contradict what the church teaches

 

[chrysostom]

It's an added tradition authorized by the papal system that you use secondary sources instead. You just gave us a link to secondary resources. We have be getting alternative information from the RCC for years. If you're ordianed, you shoud know better

that is just nonsense

 

[TulipBee]

that is just nonsense

Would it make more sense if we all interpret the bible together? I didn't read the double something link above but I already see you're in double trouble denying your denomination making their own interpretations. What's the diffence between the RCC and the Orthodox interpretations?

You're just rooting for your denominational team like a sports game. Reading the Bible alone by ourselves isn't a game. We take it seriously and you fall for alternative interpretations. Protestants are also involved in the long chain of ordination as well and you don't like it.

 

[glassjester]

Would it make more sense if we all interpret the bible together?

Does anyone have the authority to correct someone else's interpretation of Scripture?

 

[Crucible]

Does anyone have the authority to correct someone else's interpretation of Scripture?

According to you, that would be the alleged apostolic succession. Who, as far as I'm concerned looking at history, has vastly changed it's notions since the Early Ages on.

 

[glassjester]

According to you

Well what do you think?

 

[chrysostom]

What's the diffence between the RCC and the Orthodox interpretations?

just google it
-Eastern Orthodox – Roman Catholic theological differences