Right Divider
Body part
How do you come to that conclusion?It was specifically Jerusalem, the city that controlled Israel.
How do you come to that conclusion?It was specifically Jerusalem, the city that controlled Israel.
Actually it is not true that I think It is true of everyone else but not for me. If you would read more carefully you would realize that I said EVERYONE (I am part of everyone) thinks they are right, otherwise they would believe something else. It is only SOME people on here that think that doesn't apply to them. They think because they think it, that makes it right. Which I decidedly do not. That is why I am always looking.Certainly that's true for you, Arial. That's why it's so funny hearing you drone on about us.
Just so you know, "appeal to common sense" is a fallacy, because A) common sense isn't common and B) what may be common sense may not be correct.
Right, it's only the other guy that does the wrong.Actually it is not true that I think It is true of everyone else but not for me. If you would read more carefully you would realize that I said EVERYONE (I am part of everyone) thinks they are right, otherwise they would believe something else. It is only SOME people on here that think that doesn't apply to them. They think because they think it, that makes it right. Which I decidedly do not. That is why I am always looking.
I see you are able to carry on conversations with others without resorting to this time of sniping. If you can't do so with me, then don't respond to my posts. I don't have time for or interest in you cattiness.
I think this is Jesus promising to nourish them with unfailing spiritual food, though it cannot be seen now with human eyes. But why the reference of white stone and a new name?Revelation 2:17 KJV(17) He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it.
Where do we find new name in OT scripture?
Isaiah 62:2 KJV
(2) And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the LORD shall name.
Rev 17:6How do you come to that conclusion?
You went way off the rails there...Rev 17:6
And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
And the beast is Herod, since he was called a fox in the Gospels, and I assume through inflation that he was able to give his followers 666 dinarai.
The two witnesses which were "raised" from the dead were John the baptist, and Jesus bar El, the son of god.
Rev 11:11
And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them.
This sort of post fascinates the heck out of me.Just before the election I was having a conversation about it with someone I know. She was all upset about how everyone, on whatever side, thought they were right. She got so adamant that people shouldn't be that way, angry even, that people always thought they were right. Of course she did not realize that she herself was insisting on how right she was to say we should all straddle the fences as we go through life. When it is "basic common sense" that if we didn't think we were right we would believe something else.
What is coming out in this thread in vicious waves, is a people who realize this is true for everyone else but cannot see that it is true of them also.
A real life example of this type of reasoning: I was riding with a friend in her big SUV. She is an aggressive driver, riding people's bumpers, breaking all the speeding and other traffic laws, prone to constant verbal road rage. We find ourselves behind another SUV and she says to me, "When I get behind an SUV I can't see what is in front of them, I don't think people have that problem when they are behind me." I challenge you to find the "reason" in that! I was so flabbergasted I just let it go. If only I could learn to do that here!
Revelation is full of past events. It is you who is way off the rails.You went way off the rails there...
You never even came close to answering the question that you were asked.Revelation is full of past events. It is you who is way off the rails.
That's me.those who actually do have good reason to think they're right
What question is that?You never even came close to answering the question that you were asked.
It's still in the thread.What question is that?
That it is Jerusalem rather than Israel. There are few reports of murdering of prophets outside of Judah in the NT; and all that are in the NT are in Jerusalem. This suggests the whore is just a city, as is the bride of Christ.It's still in the thread.
The "woman" is chapter 12 is NOT the "whore" in later chapters.That it is Jerusalem rather than Israel. There are few reports of murdering of prophets outside of Judah in the NT; and all that are in the NT are in Jerusalem. This suggests the whore is just a city, as is the bride of Christ.
You need lots of work on the entire Bible.I still need to work in what is the Dragon with horns. Probably Israel, but Babylon the Great gets mentioned separately from the Whore, and Rome is only noted as a bunch of locusts.
oops. It is a long time since I have read Revelation of Jesus Christ.The "woman" is chapter 12 is NOT the "whore" in later chapters.
I am not as confused as the Trinity Dogma.You need lots of work on the entire Bible.
Your confusion is immense.
The "woman" in chapter 12 is neither of those things.I didn't call the New Jerusalem, which is the Bride, a whore.
Yes, I understand that you reject the Bible.I am not as confused as the Trinity Dogma.
No, I just reject the Trinity Dogma. The Jews reject it too. I am in good company.The "woman" in chapter 12 is neither of those things.
Yes, I understand that you reject the Bible.
The Jews rejected Jesus too. You are in that company.No, I just reject the Trinity Dogma. The Jews reject it too. I am in good company.
The tribe of Judah rejected Jesus agreed, but that doesn't mean all of raptured Israel and gentiles believed he was god. If anything the rapture has already happened among pre-70AD farming culture. Why is idolatry Orthodoxy?The Jews rejected Jesus too. You are in that company.