Yes, we do that each year just as he said.
we do it every sunday
some do it every day
Yes, we do that each year just as he said.
we do it every sunday
some do it every day
Mark 14:12-17 KJV
12. And the first day of unleavened bread, when they killed the passover...
Passover is a memorial observed annually on the night that begins the seven day feast of Passover. Jesus said, "Do this in remembrance of me."
Passover pictures Jesus' death as the Lamb of God.
Why did Mark refer to the 14th as the first day of unleavened bread?
Fair. Agreed. I hope to find those agreements with you.Disagree. Peter would not have thought gentiles receiving the Spirit of God would have been possible. Because you agree on the gentile point, it may be of little consequence, other than as it pertains to the assumptions we bring to the scriptures in understanding them. Such could have agreements even though our systems for understanding and interpreting those scriptures aren't in sync.
Thanks again. In Him -Lon
Understandable. I think that one of the crucial pieces of information for understanding how the early Church interacted with the Torah is what is written in 1 John: he makes claims about laws that seem only to come from someone that believes they are still part of the lives of those who love God and believe that Messiah is who He says He is. I don't know how to reconcile that thought process with what James says of works and the believer. No question, that is difficult.Can you expound a bit, especially as it is spot on with the OP, I'm thinking. Thanks.
I, too, am humbled. Thank you.None taken but your sensitivities and compassion is appreciated and I'm humbled. Thank you.
Yes, but such is to be emulated rather than copied. They actually had the 'right' teaching but 'did' it wrong. We have to be careful on several fronts: First not to think what was expected of one is expected of another. Example: I have different expectations and observances between my daughters and my sons. I expect my son, for instance, to assist more with the muscles God has given him.
His coming as the Object that casts the shadow does not eliminate the shadow-or, for a better analogy, the things that the schoolmaster taught those that love God is not did not eliminate the teaching of the schoolmaster; it brought it into new light.Second, Christ is the end of a LOT of Jewish observance, especially as it relates as a picture of Christ as they observed and were supposed to anticipate His coming.
I'm not quite sure what you mean. Please clarify for me.Third, many of their commands were only, and specifically for them. We'd sin, if we went after Philistines today as gentiles.
I could not agree more. I think that's what James aims to do in the 4 prohibitions of Acts 15-why else the statement about Moses being preached every Sabbath?Fourth, we have to ever remember that Jews had the orthodoxy, but were blowing it in orthopraxy. We shouldn't emulate that, even when/if there is any mutuality between Jew and gentile. I 'think' it better to discover Christianity through gentile eyes, as gentiles. Adding and trying to discern Jewish custom/practice, and grafting-in, over-complicates what really needs to be basic and New Testament for young believers.
Not a shared opinion, but one I can certainly understand. I think that without the Tanach, you do not have the full concept of the need for a Savior or how God would send one.I encourage new believers not to read the OT until they have read their NT 5 times through (some exceptions such as Genesis and Psalms etc.). Again, opinion, up to disagreement and scrutiny.
I'm trying to live like that, but mostly I end up being sarcastic and rude. I'm praying for change and for others....God has worked on me and has much to chisel away. I've been in a rough place for a couple of years. Of my own choosing, naturally.I try and pray for who I am debating with. I'm not sure I'm always great at communication, but at least I know, if inept, that it is covered in prayer and His sovereign graces. That He may be lifted up, and that we might all be edified in Him, -Lon
Because part of the Day of Preparation was cleaning out all leaven or breadcrumbs.
This is exactly what Jesus did in the spiritual sense, leaven being a type for sin.
However, Jesus did not violate the Law of Moses by observing the date of Passover contrary to the date specified through Moses by the Holy Spirit.
On the fourteenth day of the first month at twilight is the LORD’s Passover. (Leviticus 23:5 NKJV)
Jesus instituted a NT Passover observance ahead of time because he was going to be out of pocket on the night specified in Leviticus.
Maybe the Jews calendar was wrong.
I say definitely it was wrong, a day late.
Do you know that Jews have "postponements" whereby they delay the correct day to make High Days not fall close to a Sabbath?
Are you thinking Jesus did not know the correct date?
I said He kept it on the right date, they were wrong.
I yet think this can be expounded as it relates to Jewish practice and gentile's eating habits. I'm still not exactly sure without the specific scripture references and a bit of expansion, but as it is yet part of this thread, directly, I'd invite you to present a post specifically on it. As to James, I believe James is saying "works accompany salvation" not "works maintain salvation." I think all he is saying is, in a nutshell "if works aren't happening, what is God doing in you? Is He doing anything in you? If not, worry."I think that one of the crucial pieces of information for understanding how the early Church interacted with the Torah is what is written in 1 John: he makes claims about laws that seem only to come from someone that believes they are still part of the lives of those who love God and believe that Messiah is who He says He is. I don't know how to reconcile that thought process with what James says of works and the believer. No question, that is difficult.
I included this here, because it quickly leads into your question and our difference:The expectations, if we can call them that (though, I don't know how we couldn't), are certainly different and are fairly clearly spelled out in Torah. His coming as the Object that casts the shadow does not eliminate the shadow-or, for a better analogy, the things that the schoolmaster taught those that love God is not did not eliminate the teaching of the schoolmaster; it brought it into new light.
If today, I went to Israel and started helping them clear out their neighbors, I'd be wrong. That applied ONLY to Israel at that time. We don't uncritically adopt the 'shadow' wholesale and Jews would be wrong and in fact be rejecting Christ in sin, if they tried reinitiating animal sacrifice.I'm not quite sure what you mean. Please clarify for me.
Not a shared opinion, but one I can certainly understand. I think that without the Tanach, you do not have the full concept of the need for a Savior or how God would send one.
Who was wrong? Were the NT writers inspired by the Holy Spirit wrong?
I may have to do that. Could you ask me some questions to get that answer ball rolling? I'm wondering what concerns need the most specific attention.I yet think this can be expounded as it relates to Jewish practice and gentile's eating habits. I'm still not exactly sure without the specific scripture references and a bit of expansion, but as it is yet part of this thread, directly, I'd invite you to present a post specifically on it. As to James, I believe James is saying "works accompany salvation" not "works maintain salvation." I think all he is saying is, in a nutshell "if works aren't happening, what is God doing in you? Is He doing anything in you? If not, worry."
It does.I'm not sure if that touches on your concerns....
Understood. I think that needs to be a separate thread: What laws would be applicable after the sacrifice of Messiah? Some of them are certainly not applicable given our atoned state.I included this here, because it quickly leads into your question and our difference:
If today, I went to Israel and started helping them clear out their neighbors, I'd be wrong. That applied ONLY to Israel at that time. We don't uncritically adopt the 'shadow' wholesale and Jews would be wrong and in fact be rejecting Christ in sin, if they tried reinitiating animal sacrifice.
Sorry. That sounded like I was saying that 'you' was specific to you, but I meant it in the general 'you' sense. I was just voicing a concern of lacking the appropriate basis for study of the New Testament; when we study it outside of the context of the Tanach, we create a foundation that can negate some of the theology of the Tanach. Not to mention, the metaphors used in the New Testament find their typography in the Tanach-without the first, we cannot decipher the second. I also think that in a very logical sense, to start a complete work towards the end is a little less than appealing, although this work could give proper substance and meaning through the Spirit if any point of it was read.I didn't say 'not read it' but rather read their NT first. However, I did say it was up to scrutiny.... :Z
He had dinner early night on the 14th and then died on the day of the 14th aka the preparation day.There are many theories why Christ kept Passover before the Jews, but 4 times scripture says he kept a passover, and it was a day before the majority of Jews kept a passover.
There are many theories why Christ kept Passover before the Jews, but 4 times scripture says he kept a passover, and it was a day before the majority of Jews kept a passover.
Jesus is our Passover instead of an animal.
And He took bread, gave thanks and broke it and gave it to them, saying, "This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me." Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you." (Luke 22:19-20 NKJV)
Jesus instituted the new Passover symbols after supper. It's these symbols that Jesus refers to as this Passover. Jesus did not keep the Mosaic Passover.
Jesus did not change any thing at all in Judaism.
what does that mean in plain english?