Should Victimhood Grant Immunity From Inspection?

[Tambora]

Only according to his own thead ... in his own words ... :think:

Except that he says in God's eyes they are no longer married.

See how this going?

God?
Civil Court?

Pick the one that best suits your argument at the time????

 

[Rusha]

You sound like a victim who doesn't want inspection of his actions.

Imagine how a rape victim must feel under inspection.

I'm a victim

Only in your own mind. My PM box was a victim of your harassment. It does seem you were warned to quit harassing people. Angel specifically. Was she part of *the lynch mob*?

 

[Rusha]

Except that he says in God's eyes they are no longer married.

See how this going?

God?
Civil Court?

Pick the one that best suits your argument at the time????

I don't believe I have ever read a verse in the Bible that indicates it's okay to seek another companion while still married.

 

[elohiym]

Well, instead of making evil musings about him, why not just ask him?

I've been asking questions. Nothing is stopping him from answering. You have been answering for him, which is amusing but inappropriate.

Also, this is the exact type of inquisition I was talking about. I want none of what is happening to him to happen to me. I will leave the thread if that happens.

Leave the thread. Nobody cares if you can't handle an alleged victim's story being inspected for inconsistencies in a thread he started about the topic.

 

[1PeaceMaker]

Should the mere fact that someone has been a victim of wrongdoing automatically make their behavior (which may or may not have been contributory) exempt from examination?

Sometimes the victim's behavior can help establish a narrative for the perp's motives. That's not the same as sharing the blame for the crime, however.

Do you want to see any rape victims be stoned or imprisoned for being raped?

Do you think they can be an accessory to their violation somehow?

 

[elohiym]

Except that he says in God's eyes they are no longer married.

See how this going?

God?
Civil Court?

Pick the one that best suits your argument at the time????

Looks that way.

 

[Rusha]

Leave the thread. Nobody cares if you can't handle an alleged victim's story being inspected for inconsistencies in a thread he started about the topic.

I know I don't. Though I do find his claims of *victimhood* in a thread berating victims rather ironic.

 

[ok doser]

Some moron on TOL recently said rape victims should just suck it up.

what's the alternative?


whine about it for the rest of your life?

 

[Tambora]

He is legally married

Only by the Civil Court in his eyes.
He has admitted that in God's eyes they are no longer married.
Is he living to please God or the Civil Court?

friendly talk with a librarian

What if a married man's friendly chat with a librarian at the library turned into them arranging to get together at other places and frequent phone calls to each other?

 

[patrick jane]

I've seen this argument made in my "On Cowards and Heroes" thread and in more than a few rape threads lately.

What do you think?

Should the mere fact that someone has been a victim of wrongdoing automatically make their behavior (which may or may not have been contributory) exempt from examination?

Yes

 

[elohiym]

Yes, he claimed that but perhaps he does it for conscience sake.

What's the issue of conscience if he believes he's not married in God's eyes? If he isn't married in God's eyes, he's free!

His wife says he is free to do anything ...full blown fornication as far as I can tell. She doesn't give a rip.

Then he's free! :duh:

There is no sin in being friendly with someone and being attracted to them in the process. He isn't harming anyone.

That's called flirtation. When women do that, some morons accuse the women of defrauding them and think the women are setting themselves up to be raped.

There is no sin period with doser and his activities while still being legally married. Can you show me where he is sinning?

I have no idea what his activities have been and haven't accused him of sinning in regards to his marriage.

 

[ok doser]

are you suggesting that by being friendly to my librarian friend, i am running the risk of having her rape me? :noway:

 

[elohiym]

what's the alternative?


whine about it for the rest of your life?

How many times have you whined about what happened to you twelve years ago, Mr. victim?

 

[ok doser]

How many times have you whined about what happened to you twelve years ago, Mr. victim?

now that's retarded! :thumb:

 

[elohiym]

are you suggesting that by being friendly to my librarian friend, i am running the risk of having her rape me? :noway:

According to the new DOJ definition of rape. lain:

 

[ClimateSanity]

I've been asking questions. Nothing is stopping him from answering. You have been answering for him, which is amusing but inappropriate.



Leave the thread. Nobody cares if you can't handle an alleged victim's story being inspected for inconsistencies in a thread he started about the topic.

I've been answering for him because he is under brutal attack. You are not acting like a christian by the way. Your behavior is hateful . I sure hope the hatred is unintended because you are in danger according to very verses you like to go to right off the bat in most debates.

As for your second point, you twisted my meaning there too. Also, not christian behavior. I hope it's unintended for your sake. I stated clearly that I won't tolerate my personal life being put under inspection. I'm not the alleged victim in the OP.

 

[ok doser]

I've been answering for him because he is under brutal attack.

meh :idunno:

it's like being attacked by a pack of mewling kittens

retarded mewling kittens

 

[ClimateSanity]

what's the alternative?


whine about it for the rest of your life?

Crying and sympathy only go so far as healing any wounds. You have to eventually move on. Most people do.

 

[Rusha]

What's the issue of conscience if he believes he's not married in God's eyes? If he isn't married in God's eyes, he's free!

Then he's free! :duh:

That's called flirtation. When women do that, some morons accuse the women of defrauding them and think the women are setting themselves up to be raped.

I have no idea what his activities have been and haven't accused him of sinning in regards to his marriage.

The interesting part about this whole conversation is that we a a self-proposed Christian man who inquired about whether or not it was okay to have a relationship with a woman outside of his marriage. He claims his wife cheated and they had been separated for years.

When I was married and found out my husband committed adultery, I divorced him. While we were legally married, I didn't date or even bother with striking up a friendship with another man. I also found a job with excellent health benefits so that my children would have coverage regardless of whether or not their father was working.

Not buying what he's selling ... his *story* reeks of hypocrisy and convenience.

 

[ClimateSanity]

Only by the Civil Court in his eyes.
He has admitted that in God's eyes they are no longer married.
Is he living to please God or the Civil Court?



What if a married man's friendly chat with a librarian at the library turned into them arranging to get together at other places and frequent phone calls to each other?

If the married man is not separated and if his wife actually gives a damn, then he is sinning. A man in the process of divorce to a wife who could care less about his activities with other women is doing nothing sinful at all in your scenario.

He pays attention to the civil court to avoid accusations and defame God in men's eyes. He might also be refraining from intercourse out of conscience toward God. He may feel it is wrong.