lifeisgood
New member
Hopefully, the lesson was learned, and everyone can move on from here.
What was the lesson that you learned? Thank you.
Hopefully, the lesson was learned, and everyone can move on from here.
"from such turn away" really means "call them out on it"? :freak:
:darwinsm:
good one!
you and squeaky should take your acts on the road
a heavily trafficked road![]()
Got ya O clueless one everything Jesus taught is subject to whether YOU agree with it or not, and or you pit scripture against scripture. Scripture really does agree with itself not that you can comprehend or receive that truth.
Just you skirting the obvious, in your double-standard, due to your equally obvious poor ability to think a thing through from within a wider frame of reference before allowing yourself your conclusions.
It is "the powers that be" that you view as "ordained of God" that have nevertheless decreed the Pro-Choice law you assert you are opposed to.
By your ill-thought out argument, said Pro-Choice law was "ordained of God."
:doh: :chuckle:
Just as it was "the powers that be" that decreed "the right to bear arms" right we both hold to, but that the Apostles depicted in "the New Testament" had apparantly not held, for supppsedly, they were all martyred and that: willingly.
dodge ball, even though it was the Israelite Prophet: Daniel himself, who told King Nebuchadnezzar that the God of Israel had put him in power over Daniel's people, was Daniel then wrong to go against Nebi's edict that he: Nebi, was to be worshipped?
Again...
:doh: :chuckle:
Why are you so desperate to find "balance" by saying "I know you are, but what am I?" One outrage doesn't mutually exclude another, and you can't justify the moral wrong perpetrated by the Trump administration.
You never really think a thing through do you ! Render unto Cesar the things that are Cesar's and unto God the thing that are God's. O clueless one if of Cesar's laws do not violate God's laws then obey them and if they do don't. See it really isn't rocket science.
It's fairly obvious what the Time Magazine pic was representing ... reality. Innocent brown children looking on in fear towards someone who holds ill-will towards them and has the power and ability to destroy their lives. I have to keep wondering how these precious children are seen to be less worthy of love, health and life as compared to unborn babies. Being prolife means pro-all-children and doesn't end after they leave the womb.
Yo, incompetent, you have taken that passage out of its overall context.
As for the rest of your usual dribble, must be why the Apostles allowed themselves to be unjustly martyred.
It's fairly obvious what the Time Magazine pic was representing ... reality. Innocent brown children looking on in fear towards someone who holds ill-will towards them and has the power and ability to destroy their lives. I have to keep wondering how these precious children are seen to be less worthy of love, health and life as compared to unborn babies. Being prolife means pro-all-children and doesn't end after they leave the womb.
The answer is simple, but very unpopular. There are more than will admit wh
o feel brown children are less intelligent and able as white children and if too many enter the US, then the country will be dumbed down, and fail to be a first world nation.
I am passing on what I hear from many who oppose immigration.They would not oppose it so much if it were European children, or Asian children.
The answer is simple, but very unpopular. There are more than will admit who feel brown children are less intelligent and able as white children and if too many enter the US, then the country will be dumbed down, and fail to be a first world nation.
I am passing on what I hear from many who oppose immigration.They would not oppose it so much if it were European children, or Asian children.
Playing devils advocate here, but isn't that a justifiable assumption based on how horrible their home countries are?
The Apostles were martyred for preaching Jesus NOT Paul O clueess one.
What was the lesson that you learned? Thank you.
There ya go making sense again. Speaking sensibly and expecting a liberal to get it is like trying to nail jello to a wall.
The answer is simple, but very unpopular. There are more than will admit who feel brown children are less intelligent and able as white children and if too many enter the US, then the country will be dumbed down, and fail to be a first world nation.
Playing devils advocate here, but isn't that a justifiable assumption based on how horrible their home countries are?
No.
The immigrant kids I had in my classes were generally very good and motivated students. Granted, many of these were kids with parents willing to risk everything to get them out of a horrible situation, so they were probably a good deal better than the average.
Barbarian, regarding Trump's failed plan to discourage asylum applications by abusing the children of those applying:
Hopefully, the lesson was learned, and everyone can move on from here.
That he has no shame, but he can be intimidated by public outrage.
Hopefully, the lesson was learned, and everyone can move on from here.