icilian fenner
New member
Save that if they were, less people would do them, and therefore lives would be saved. That was the substance of your post before. If you disagree that this is a reason to criminalise an activity, then you must agree that:You're an idiot. There is absolutely no reason for motor sports or burnt toast to be crimes, period.
"If the government were to execute people for engaging in homosexual activity, less people would engage in it, for fear of execution, and more lives would be saved, because they would be saved from killing themselves."
doesn't justify or help to justify executing homosexuals. no?
We were discussing directly ONLY "If the government were to execute people for engaging in homosexual activity, less people would engage in it, for fear of execution, and more lives would be saved, because they would be saved from killing themselves." I made a criticism of this, to which you didn't respond directly. Instead you decided to neither refute or conceed, and moved swiftly on to another issue.How so?
I'm trying to maintain a standard of civility. It gets none of us anywhere to give each other a piece of our mind, and certainly attacking the person to try and preserve a point without first answering the point either at all or sufficiently is certainly not a legitimate way to debate.Stop whining.
I don't think theres anything wrong with how I'm conducting myself, do you?
When it comes to something that endangers more than a single person who is involving themselves, and is always dangerous, no matter the "precautions" taken, yes, I do.
Motor races with more than one participant or a crowd. What I think really is the standard is the witting and adult consent of all the people involved to risk their lives, or in the case of children, a society of adults putting forth what situations the children can and cant consent to.