I've had no formal training, but I find tackling followed by repeated punching to be pretty effective.
Reall, krav? If your going to really take the time to study that then you wil def be prepared to defend yourself
A well rounded mix of western boxing and some anti choke moves like BJJ or my fave sambo will keep most attackers at bay. Pure self defense should be a thoughtfull mind, aware of your surroundings and a gun, ur not Gona out train a 230 lb man by buying a krav video...
BTW Buzzword Im not saying Krav is not great , but if your going to put the time in to learn a art I suggest getting a qualified instructor, not a DVD,,,
Spitfire I have practiced alot of the nerve strikes taught in ninjitsu and like you say , unless you live and train it like in kill bill it wont work to well... yes when you hit them they will shut down the nervous system but if you miss you would have been better of with a good palm to the nose to stop them from seeing and make your getaway
I've had some formal training (goju-ryu and taekwondo), but for some reason, it usually all goes out the window, and I just wade in there and take them to the ground. That seems to be my element. I should probably study some Brazilian jiu-jitsu, as it seems pretty similar to my natural way of doing things.
I was wondering what are the best self defense fighting systems to defend yourself in a real world situation? Have you had to defend yourself from a would be attacker?
If so how did it go?
Great discussion everyone. Granite, the interview was very enlightening.
I've had no formal training, but I find tackling followed by repeated punching to be pretty effective.
You're more of a pill than usual lately. Eat some bran or something.
The best self defense "system" is to do your utmost to avoid situations where you put yourself in harm's way. If push comes to shove, well...
This is an extremely illuminating discussion.
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/self-defense-and-the-law
That was a great interview.
This part here:Sam Harris: I completely agree that avoidance is almost the whole story when it comes to self-defense. I also agree that it is very easy to lose sight of this truth, because people don’t really train for avoidance or de-escalation. Rory talks about this a lot in his work. And there is a very unhappy valley between knowing nothing about self-defense and knowing a lot, where the average martial artist is probably more likely to get into a violent altercation than he otherwise would have been. His ego has become bound up in being someone who can handle violence and who doesn’t have to take **** from anyone, and his training has probably given him some unrealistic ideas about his own competence. However, granting that a person can be anywhere from really foolish to impeccable on this front, there is still a subset of cases where violence is simply unavoidable. Hence the importance of this conversation.One of my son's black belts is in Krav Maga and his favorite long-time instructor's mantra was always that the best defensive weapon was a good pair of running shoes.
This man has wisdom. lain:
I thought so. The best advice seems to be "flee, do everything to flee, escape, and only fight in order to escape."
And some big shells when needed.
And some big shells when needed.
But the most impressive part of Johnston’s investigations came next, when she asked whether it was possible to change the way we walk so as to appear less vulnerable. A first group of volunteers were filmed walking before and after doing a short self defence course. Using the point-light technique, their walking styles were rated by volunteers (not prisoners) for vulnerability. Perhaps surprisingly, the self-defence training didn't affect the walkers’ ratings.
In a second experiment, recruits were given training in how to walk, specifically focusing on the aspects which the researchers knew affected how vulnerable they appeared: factors affecting the synchrony and energy of their movement. This led to a significant drop in all the recruits' vulnerability ratings, which was still in place when they were re-tested a month later.
I read the actual study and noted that even those classified as "non-victims" because they had higher average scores generally still fell into the range of fairly easy targets on the scale the prisoners were given. Just not as easy as others.This is an article about a study on the way people walk and the way assailants assess our motion in choosing victims:
BBC Future: How the way we walk can increase risk of being mugged
I read the actual study and noted that even those classified as "non-victims" because they had higher average scores generally still fell into the range of fairly easy targets on the scale the prisoners were given. Just not as easy as others.
This is an article about a study on the way people walk and the way assailants assess our motion in choosing victims:
BBC Future: How the way we walk can increase risk of being mugged
It's interesting that you can learn to "walk the walk" that can help keep you from being targeted:
Worth a read, it's really interesting.
General size and appearance helps.
Apart from some instances in SA which were die race and relative wealth, i've always managed to be trouble free in some very bad neighborhoods alone, a lot by presence and minding my own business.
But i'm over 6 foot over 210 lbs, and don't look the gentle sort. If your were 5 foot 2 and 120 lbs i'm sure the same walk wont keep you out of trouble.