An interlinear is not needed and is not impressive to me. Especially the Apostolic Polygot of the LXX you have used. Its NT text is from the Complutensian Greek New Testament, which is Byzantine in its roots. While I have great affinity for the Byzantine manuscript tradition, the Complutensian Text is generally Romanist in its construction. I am quite adept at the original languages, but rarely see the need to appeal to either, so rather than make this dependent upon a priestly caste of Hebrew and Greek specialists, let's just look at the text in question.
KJV: And brought the a-s-s, and the colt, and put on them their clothes, and they set him thereon.
Our Lord was sat upon their garments, not upon the a-s-s (the colt's mother) and the colt (the foal of a donkey). He sat upon their garments on the colt. (See also Zechariah 9:9; Isaiah 62:11; 2 Sam. 19-20; Gen. 49:10-11; 1 Kings 1:38-40) The presence of the mother likely calmed the never ridden before colt (see Mark and Luke accounts), especially given the commotions of the crowds.
Here Matthew took some pleasure in the fact that the Zechariah account can be read as both mother and foal, so mentions both of them. Matthew was not ignorant of Old Testament idiom, and recognized parallelism when he saw it. Hence, Matthew's mention of the second donkey is due rather to a typically Jewish interest in the form of the text, so that even though Matthew knew the Zechariah reference referred to only one animal, its wording nonetheless lent itself to the mention of the other. The expansive poetic wording of the OT text has given Matthew scope for adding a further creative twist to his concept of “fulfillment.”
No contradictions here between Mark and Luke if one has a fuller grasp of the intent of the writers and a solid grounding in Biblical hermeneutics.
AMR
There are only two Greek versions as far as I can see, the interlinear matches the first five versions given below, the other four are only slightly different:
SBL Greek New Testament 2010
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον, καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπ’ αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια, καὶ ἐπεκάθισεν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν.
Nestle Greek New Testament 1904
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον, καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπ’ αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια, καὶ ἐπεκάθισεν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν.
Westcott and Hort 1881
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον, καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπ' αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια, καὶ ἐπεκάθισεν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν.
Westcott and Hort / [NA27 variants]
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον, καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπ' αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια, καὶ ἐπεκάθισεν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν.
Tischendorf 8th Edition
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον, καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπ’ αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια, καὶ ἐπεκάθισεν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν.
RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον, καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια αὐτῶν, καὶ ἐπεκάθισεν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν.
Greek Orthodox Church 1904
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον, καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια αὐτῶν, καὶ ἐπεκάθισεν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν.
Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον, καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια, αὐτῶν, καὶ ἐπεκάθισαν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν.
Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550
ἤγαγον τὴν ὄνον καὶ τὸν πῶλον καὶ ἐπέθηκαν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν τὰ ἱμάτια αὐτῶν καὶ ἐπεκάθισεν ἐπάνω αὐτῶν
Matthew 21 Interlinear
http://biblehub.com/interlinear/matthew/21-7.htm
Why do you use the KJV when the interlinear is the most accurate? Or if you use the last four because you think they match the KJV more closely why don't you instead use the word for word translation of that Greek text? Word for word is more accurate than any paraphrased Bible surely:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=B...hWKh7QKHaAgB84Q9QEIKzAB#imgrc=T0jprDaZ31tOJM:
Also Zechariah uses the male form of the word donkey, can you explain why Matthew says she?:
Zechariah 9:9
Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! Shout, Daughter Jerusalem! See, your king comes to you, righteous and victorious, lowly and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.
http://biblehub.com/interlinear/zechariah/9-9.htm
he-***
Or (shortened) chamor {kham-ore}; from chamar; a male *** (from its dun red) -- (he)***.
http://biblehub.com/strongs/hebrew/2543.htm
