1 Corinthians 1-4. Is not the Gospel. It is an outline of the Gospel.
=dementia, as he asserts that 1 Cor. 15:1-4 is not the gospel of Christ, but merely "an outline."
Did Christ die for our/your sins, sin debt? Yes, or no?
The spiritually dead rock does not know what the Gospel is, nor is he capable of understanding it. For the sake of others I will explain what the Gospel is.
No, your gospel, "Pate-ianity," "good news, is not that Christ died for our sins, you believe that Christ did not die for our sins/sin debt, per 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, on record, as you cannot agreed that He did,
since you assert that the law, that defines our future yet uncommitted sins/sin debt when He died, was destroyed, made void, at the cross, and thus there is no sin debt incurred, for which to die. Thus, you assert that He died in vain. Instead, you satanically assert that He did not die for our sins, but died to destroy, make vain the law( although not one scripture, in either the OT, or NT, expounds that His death was necessary, to make that happen, but scripture does testify of the "sacrificial substitute," death, by blood, to satisfy the demands of the law, but not destroy it), so that no one can be condemned, judged by that the law, since that law no longer exists=no law, no transgression/sin, resulting sin debt.
Thus,
Pate, on record, asserts that the Saviour did not take our place, in judgment, condemnation, as our substitute, "FOR," dying for us breaking, by definition, the existing holy law of God, to satisfy justice, but instead died to eliminate any possible judgment, condemnation, by destroying, making vain, His own holy, spiritual law.
Thus, Pate, on record, rejects SUBSTITUTIONARY ATONEMENT, replacing it with "Destroy the law, make it void, so that a substitute to take the judgment, condemnation, and resulting penalty for breaking that law is not necessary, since the law defining the sin debt, and the need for a substitute, its principle, is not needed."
It is that simple. But this deceiver will obfuscate,spam verses in isolation, refuse to address challenges to his assertions, lie, pegging almost everyone on TOL as reprobates, not having any evidence of being a Christian, lie, deceive, punt questions, all the while, claiming he is the only one that preaches "The Gospel."
He is a child of the devil, hates the gospel of Christ, on record, denying that Christ died for our sins, sin debt, as there is none.
The Gospel is that work that Jesus did in our name and on our behalf that justifies the ungodly, Romans 4:5 and reconciles us and the world unto God, 2 Corinthians 5:18,19.
All that Jesus is and all that Jesus did is for our salvation and justification.
When Jesus lived, we lived in him. He is our representative savior.
When Jesus died, we died with him.
When Jesus ascended into heaven, we ascended with him.
When Jesus was accepted back into heaven, we were accepted in him.
Our humanity was constituted in him. Jesus came into the world to perfect our humanity and take it back to heaven, Our salvation is in a very safe place, Colossians 3:3.
We have been MADE perfect and complete "In Christ" Colossians 2:10.
Sin, death and the devil have been destroyed and Jesus is Lord, Acts 2:36. The law has been fulfilled and abolished, Matthew 5:18 and Ephesians 2:15. Where there is law, there is judgment and condemnation.
"There is no condemnation to those that are "In Christ" Romans 8:1.
God sees ALL THINGS in his Son Jesus Christ, Colossians 1:20. When God looks at us all that he can see is his Son Jesus Christ, Colossians 3:3.
Spam, evasion, as he will not answer:
Did Christ die for your/our sins, according to the scriptures, which you delete?
Yes, or no?
No, your gospel, "Pate-ianity," "good news, is not that Christ died for our sins, you believe that Christ did not die for our sins/sin debt, per 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, on record, as you cannot agreed that He did, since you assert that the law, that defines our future yet uncommitted sins/sin debt when He died, was destroyed, made void, at the cross, and thus there is no sin debt incurred, for which to die. Thus, you assert that He died in vain. Instead, you satanically assert that He did not die for our sins, but died to destroy, make vain the law( although not one scripture, in either the OT, or NT, expounds that His death was necessary, to make that happen, but scripture does testify of the "sacrificial substitute," death, by blood, to satisfy the demands of the law, but not destroy it), so that no one can be condemned, judged by that the law, since that law no longer exists=no law, no transgression/sin, resulting sin debt.
Thus, Pate, on record, asserts that the Saviour did not take our place, in judgment, condemnation, as our substitute, "FOR," dying for us breaking, by definition, the existing holy law of God, to satisfy justice, but instead died to eliminate any possible judgment, condemnation, by destroying, making vain, His own holy, spiritual law.
Thus, Pate, on record, rejects SUBSTITUTIONARY ATONEMENT, replacing it with "Destroy the law, make it void, so that a substitute to take the judgment, condemnation, and resulting penalty for breaking that law is not necessary, since the law defining the sin debt, and the need for a substitute, its principle, is not needed."
It is that simple. But this deceiver will obfuscate,spam verses in isolation, refuse to address challenges to his assertions, lie, pegging almost everyone on TOL as reprobates, not having any evidence of being a Christian, lie, deceive, punt questions, all the while, claiming he is the only one that preaches "The Gospel."
Beware of those false teachers that try to teach doctrine without scripture.
Spam, evasion, changing the subject, asserting, denying, that Christ died for our sins, per 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV, on record, as you cannot agreed that He did, since you assert that the law, that defines our future yet uncommitted sins/sin debt when He died, was destroyed, made void, at the cross, and thus there is no sin debt incurred, for which to die.
Tell us if Christ died for our sins, and when, Pate.
Tell us how you say that you sin, when there is no sin debt to be incurred by you, since, according to you, there is no longer God's holy law in existence, it being destroyed, made void, 2000+ years ago, which defines sin, and thus the resulting sin debt, and penalty.
Silence-for over 2 years.