Arthur Brain
Well-known member
You've shown nothing of the sort. You've cherry picked one case where variables were in play and there are always going to be anomalies but they're not the rule of thumb.
Your latter is just flat out ridiculous. The guidance measures were given because the evidence, data and findings showed the efficacy of lockdowns and other safety mandates as shown in absolute detail and which you haven't come within a light year of refuting. Nor will you be able to because factual data - as provided shows their effectiveness.