Rebuttal of the dreadful doctrine of reprobation

[Cross Reference]

Originally Posted by the Nangster

"I consider all Arminians unregenerate and remaining in the darkness of false teaching".

Sortta sez it all, doesn't it?

Question: Who is the false, the unbeliever on this forum, the one who has been misprepresenting the Holy Scriptures in order that she be able to declare her mindset? Why is she being allowed to remain on a Christian forum?

 

[Sonnet]

Originally Posted by the Nangster



Sortta sez it all, doesn't it?

Question: Who is the false, the unbeliever one on this forum, the one who has been misprepresenting the Holy Scriptures in order that she be able to declare her mindset?

Tulip held up to be the Gospel itself - an astonishing reverence considering there is not one verse that explicitly establishes their limited atonement and election/reprobation.

 

[Cross Reference]

Tulip help up to be the Gospel itself - an astonishing reverence considering there is not one verse that explicitly establishes their limited atonement and election/reprobation.

To me, it is unbelieveable, remarkably so!

What I don't understand is why they raise the issue?

 

[Eagles Wings]

I'll employ Christian language if I want, thanks.

Ask CR and GT if I am anti-Christian.

You are the one affirming non-Calvinists aren't saved.

You have been strongly rebuked by true Christians, Sonnet. I'd take it to heart if I were you.

 

[Cross Reference]

You have been strongly rebuked by true Christians, Sonnet. I'd take it to heart if I were you.

What "true" Christians are you refering to?

 

[Cross Reference]

What "true" Christians are you refering to? A true Christian is a disciple of Christ, chosen of Him to be such, one with insight and understanding purposed for him to learn the ways of God.

 

[Sonnet]

You have been strongly rebuked by true Christians, Sonnet. I'd take it to heart if I were you.

The reality is that I responded to you at #2238 & #2240 and you never replied.

 

[God's Truth]

Silly lady. Your view has been shown to be outside the bounds of orthodoxy for some time now. Each and every time you post something implying it is the truth of God you are but shaking your fist at God. You profess what you do not possess.

AMR

Your little catchy phrases from mere men mean nothing to me, but it tells all who have eyes and ears that you are lost in the teachings of men.

 

[PneumaPsucheSoma]

Your little catchy phrases from mere men mean nothing to me, but it tells all who have eyes and ears that you are lost in the teachings of men.

But your Modalism, wherein the Father IS the Son contrary to scripture, is from the teachings of men, including Sabellius.

 

[Cross Reference]

Your little catchy phrases from mere men mean nothing to me, but it tells all who have eyes and ears that you are lost in the teachings of men.

That is pretty good insight, GT but don't take it too far because there of lots of men who have insight AMR and others as him can't recogize for lack of it in themselves. . i.e., no pentecost in their lives.

 

[God's Truth]

But your Modalism, wherein the Father IS the Son contrary to scripture, is from the teachings of men, including Sabellius.

I did not learn any such thing from any man.

The Bible says there is ONLY ONE GOD AND NONE BESIDES HIM.

Since Jesus is God, he must be the one and only God the Father come in the flesh as a Son.

 

[God's Truth]

That is pretty good insight, GT but don't take it too far because there of lots of men who have insight AMR and others as him can't recogize for lack of it in themselves. . i.e., no pentecost in their lives.

Now that is good insight too, and I agree.

 

[Eagles Wings]

But your Modalism, wherein the Father IS the Son contrary to scripture, is from the teachings of men, including Sabellius.

Indeed, and condemned as heresy. Thus, the beauty of historic Creeds and Confessions of Faith.

 

[Cross Reference]

Now that is good insight too, and I agree.

Then keep pressing in to know Him per John17:3.

 

[Eagles Wings]

It's called "obfuscation by silence".

Is the obfuscation intentional or unintentional and is it a result of circumlocution or from use of jargon or even argot?

You've only got a couple of minutes to answer before I call, "the silence is telling."

 

[Cross Reference]

Is the obfuscation intentional or unintentional and is it a result of circumlocution or from use of jargon or even argot?

You've only got a couple of minutes to answer before I call, "the silence is telling."

Well, I suggest you use everyday english if you need a quick answer. .

 

[Ask Mr. Religion]

Is the obfuscation intentional or unintentional and is it a result of circumlocution or from use of jargon or even argot?

You've only got a couple of minutes to answer before I call, "the silence is telling."

Indeed.

:rotfl:

AMR

 

[chrysostom]

0 Bible results for “reprobation .”

Sorry, we didn’t find any results for your search. Please try the following:

Double-check spelling, especially people and place names.
Make sure there are spaces between words. Bible Gateway treats “nameoftheFather” and “name of the Father” differently.
Use fewer words in your search, especially if you’re unsure of the exact phrase. For example, “baptizing name Father” and “baptizing them in the name of the Father” will both return Matthew 28:19; however, the latter leaves a greater chance for spelling and syntax errors.
Retry your search in another translation.

King James Version (KJV)
Public Domain

 

[Cross Reference]

Well, I suggest you use everyday english if you need a quick answer. .

Intentional with silence usually only after their inane "circumlocution" has runs it course.

 

[God's Truth]

Then keep pressing in to know Him per John17:3.

I know Him. If I said I did not, I would be a liar.

John 8:55 Though you do not know him, I know him. If I said I did not, I would be a liar like you, but I do know him and obey his word.