Sonnet
New member
And what would that be?
Rebuttal of the dreadful doctrine of reprobation
- Thread starter Sonnet
- Start date
And what would that be?
AMR explained it all to you; however, you are to dumb to understand what he is saying. Now you want me to explain simple?
Sonnet
New member
I wont respond to this (your post).
Sonnet
New member
AMR's link has McMahon affirming 2 Corinthians 5:18-21 as a 'very well defined summation of the Gospel':
"We implore you on Christ’s behalf, be reconciled to God. For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."
Auditors are told that Christ is made to be sin for them. That's atonement for all.
AMR believes in limited atonement and atonement for all?
"We implore you on Christ’s behalf, be reconciled to God. For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him."
Auditors are told that Christ is made to be sin for them. That's atonement for all.
AMR believes in limited atonement and atonement for all?
“Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. And thou shalt not lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith; neither shall any woman stand before a beast, to lie down thereto: it is confusion.”
**Leviticus *18:22-23 *ASV
http://bible.com/12/lev.18.22-23.asv
Sent from my iPhone using TOL
**Leviticus *18:22-23 *ASV
http://bible.com/12/lev.18.22-23.asv
Sent from my iPhone using TOL
Sonnet
New member
Non-sequitur?
Sonnet
New member
God's Truth
New member
That is a non Calvin thing to say. So are you a four point tulip instead of five?
Sonnet
New member
Which is why Paul could offer salvation through belief - and in particular belief in Christ's resurrection - the VERY EVENT CALVINISTS SAY SOME HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE BENEFITS OF.
Cross Reference
New member
Me either. Too convoluted.
Cross Reference
New member
AMR:
This does not jibe with:
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient . . . . . . ." Romans 1:28-32 KJV.
This does not jibe with:
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient . . . . . . ." Romans 1:28-32 KJV.
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Encouraging from your implied view that the Reformed perspective is the most accurate perspective, so if one is going to choose wisely, ignoring the Reformed view is perilous. At least those denying the Good News appreciate the fact that the Reformed view is the one to deny.
You could have easily adopted the Arminian contradictions and views and not have "fell away", no? :AMR:
All Arminians are but Calvinists in training.
AMR
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Try dealing substantially with the full content of the link in question versus skimming it for assumed "Gotchas!" and then we will talk. I am under no obligation to deal with your cherry-picking of things explained in detail until you demonstrate an equal effort of detailed examination and/or rebuttal giving evidence you have actually digested responses to your many and various "Yeah, buts...".
Make the effort to understand that you do not control the discussion unless and until you do the same heavy lifting as those that have responded to you in detail have so done. Playing twenty questions is not a discussion, but merely a child's game for those who take the bait.
Let me help you out. Take the two linked items I have provided you for study. Respond to them on a paragraph by paragraph basis containing your own expositions and opinions based upon the same. Demonstrate that you actually are able to engage the views of another at the same level they have been offered. This is the mark of a man who is not intellectually lazy. It takes time and effort, something you seem unwilling to expend.
Rather, you simply want to nip at the heels of others and sit back with arms folded declaring victory. That will not do and only serves to show your superficiality on matters of importance.
There is not a single person I know that holds to the Reformed view that is unwilling or unable to engage the sincere person willing to meet them at the same level. If all you have to offer is but the above "nana nana boo boos" of yours, you will never come to a more full understanding of that which you are caviling about.
The ball is in your court. Decide how you proceed next.
AMR
Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Romans 1 makes it clear that the unbeliever is without excuse, for the world around them testifies to the existence of God. All have this sensus divinitatis, but due to their fallen state of total moral inability, have suppressed the truth by wrong rationalizations stemming from their fallen state. At the point of regeneration by the Holy Spirit, the unregenerate is made willing to believe and will in fact believe. A more full knowledge of that which they now hold dear will come in their walk of faith, said knowledge coming more fully to some than to others according to the gifts they have been granted.
AMR
All Arminians are but Calvinists in training.
AMR
That is so wrong and so hilarious at the same time.
Lol!!!!!
I'm stealing that line in the future, but spoken with different isms.
[emoji846]
Sent from my iPad using TOL ~Jesus is the Theology and the Counselor is the Commentary
God's Truth
New member
What you say is NOWHERE in the Bible.
God's Truth
New member
Calvinists have to ensnare those who have already come to believe the truth, or else no one would be a Calvinist.