(Barbarian shows that whites are slightly more likely to attack blacks than blacks are likely to attack whites)
It's the FBI summary. And as you see, both whites and blacks kill the other race at lower than expected rates than if they chose randomly, but whites are slightly more likely to kill blacks than blacks are to kill whites:
About 78% of Americans are white. About 13% are black. So, if a criminal of either color randomly picks victims, with no racial agenda, he would get a white victim about 78% of the time, and a black victim about 13% of the time.
But blacks pick white victims only 13.6 percent of the time, and whites pick black victims about 8% of the time:
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/uc...ender_2013.xls
So blacks kill whites less than 1/5 as frequently as they should if they were randomly picking victims. Racism seems to work well for whites.
And whites kill blacks only about 6/10 as frequently as they should if they were randomly picking victims. Racism works for blacks in this regard, too, but not quite as well as it works for whites.
It's telling though, that you don't provide any evidence whatever.
Again, no evidence? We all know why, Connie.
They are disproportionately represented among those killed by cops, where those cops were later arrested or disciplined for it. Maybe there's a point there, after all.
That's because you're an idiot, for whom numbers are an impenetrable mystery. But you surely must now suspect that the FBI data shows something that you don't want to see, even if the math confounds you.
