Shasta
Well-known member
Jerry Shugart;4968665]The Bible says that a person has eternal life the moment when they believe. and the lord Jesus says that those to whom He gives eternal life will never perish. But you deny that truth.
You do get eternal life but that life comes from Him and you must remain in Him and continue in Him to enjoy it. It is permanently and irrevocably granted only when we are judged.
The Scriptures also say that eternal life is a gift (Ro.6:23). The Scriptures also say that the gifts of God are irrevocable which means that He will not take back that gift from those to whom He gives it: "for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable" (Ro.11:29).[/INDENT]
Remaining faithful to Christ, continuing to believe does not EARN salvation. It is just a necessary condition. In context, the verse you brought up that speaks of "gifts and callings" being "irrevocable" is about the Jewish people.
…28 Regarding the gospel, they are enemies on your account; but regarding election, they are loved on account of the patriarchs. 29 For God’s gifts and His call are irrevocable (Romans 11:29).
The particular Jews Paul was referring to were apostate with respect to the faith because they had rejected their Messiah. Paul says they had become enemies of the gospel; nevertheless their election to a special purpose remained (and still remains). This does not illustrate the idea that having a calling means you will never fall away. As a matter of fact, Paul used the Jew's apostasy to warn believers about what could happen to them.
20...They were broken off because of unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but be afraid. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you either. 22 Take notice, therefore, of the kindness and severity of God: severity to those who fell, but kindness to you, IF you continue in His kindness. Otherwise you also will be cut off.
As I said before the word "continue" is an intensive form of the word "abide" which means "continue on with persistence. Now in your thinking this is probably optional but in this verse Paul says that not continuing means being cut off, the same fate as that of a branch that does not abide in the Vine.
But you say that the LORD will take back that gift. We can also see that those who are given eternal life will not come into judgment concerning his salvation:
"Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life" (Jn.5:24).
But you say that when someone no longer possess eternal life they will be judged.
The promise of eternal life is for everyone who believes. That is true but Jesus is not addressing the issue of those who depart from Christ because of an evil heart of unbelief. That side of the matter need to be addressed every time the promise is spoken. The whole balance of truth can be found in many scriptures. Did you know that no one in the Early Church back to the first century believed this eternal security doctrine, not even Augustine or, much later, Luther. Both of them believed Christians could apostasize. Your belief came ultimately from John Calvin.
This verse is speaking of a Christian's service or fruit bearing. Not salvation.
Sir Robert Anderson writes, "The language of the sixth verse, if carefully studied, will prevent our mistaking His meaning. 'If any one does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch, and is withered.' To bear fruit apart from Him is quite as impossible as to be saved apart from Him. The severed branch of another sort of tree might be used in some way. But as every Palestinian peasant knew, vine branches were useless ; men gather them and cast them into the fire and they are burned. Indeed, these words of Christ about vine branches are, no doubt, a reference to Ezekiel xv. 8, 4, 'Shall wood be taken thereof to do any work? Behold, it is cast into the fire for fuel.' They are not a doctrinal statement relating to the future destiny of men, but a parable to illustrate truth relating to the conduct and life of His people here and now" (Anderson, Misunderstood Texts of the New Testament, [Kregel Publications, 1991], pp.68-69).
The fact that Christ's words "Abide (remain, continue) in Me" is in the imperative mood means that it is a command which the will must obey. If what you were saying were true there would be no need to command any believer to do it. Their connection to Christ would be permanent and fixed but continuing on in Christ is a choice we must continue to make and if we can do it then we can refuse to do it. The question that naturally arises is what happens if we consistently refuse. Jesus answers that question.
Your commentator has dreamed up a fantastic and illogical way to get around the implications of this passage - which he clearly cannot accept. To make the passage more acceptable he finds it necessary to transform the "branches" which Jesus had introduced as meaning His disciples into people connected to some different kind of tree.
The dialogue of John 15 as it is written is integrated and flows smoothly as Jesus continues to develop His teaching using the same imagery. From speaking of branches that abide in the vine He goes on to focus on those who do not and then to their fate. There is no point of transition where He changes direction and suddenly introduces the idea of a completely different species of trees and branches that have never been connected to Him.
Ezekiel 15:1-8 does talk about a tree and vines that are burned in a fire but he is speaking of Jerusalem which was in a state of rebellion. Obviously, Jerusalem HAD been a "domesticated vine" tended by God at one time in their history. However in falling away they had become "no different than all the other trees (nations) of the forest (the world)" This is comparable to the person who does not abide in Christ.
Apparently your commentator rests his entire case on his claim that Palestinian peasants do not burn vines. That is a slim basis upon which to establish an interpretation of a very well-known scripture. It is not logical, really, since the teaching is more like a parable than a detailed analysis of farming practices.
Hardly anyone listening to this story would automatically assume that Jesus must suddenly be talking about a DIFFERENT tree SIMPLY because its vines are being burned (and, as all of us Palestinians know vines do not burn). I rather doubt that part too. If a vine is cut off and dried in the sun (which is what withering implies) it will burn if the fire is hot enough, though it may not be good to use as kindling to start the fire.
Bearing fruit is not only about service. It is a sign that we have maintained a relationship of love for, faith in and obedience to Jesus. Faith is inseparable from love and obedience.
Last edited: