If God were subject to time, it would be His god. :nono:
Why not?
Does God have a past or does God experience our past just as He experiences our present?
If God were subject to time, it would be His god. :nono:
Why not?
Does God have a past or does God experience our past just as He experiences our present?
If God is the creator do you think that He forgot what He created and abandoned it?
If God is the creator does He not lead?
How can God only be in the present and yet lead?
He is not subject to the things He creates.Why (is God) not (subject to time)?
He knows all time, even the beginning and end of it.Does God have a past or does God experience our past just as He experiences our present?
Did God exist before He created time? If so, for how long?
Is God in the past just as He is in the present?
If you knew The Real God, instead of mere facts, you'd know that He is Omniscient, eternal and timeless. Your god is a figment of your intellect.
How long does it take for God to see the news on CNN? Is Heaven close enough to earth that it is the same day when He watches it to see what happened on our planet?
:hammer:
God isn't "subject" to having a past. He created everything knowing the future. There is a difference between us and Him.
God created the sequence.
If God were subject to time, it would be His god. :nono:
He is not subject to the things He creates.He knows all time, even the beginning and end of it.
Good grief, Charlie Brown. I fully affirm that God is omniscient and eternal, but would be wrong to say that He is timeless (since Scripture and logic preclude this Platonic idea): J.R. Lucas 'A treatise on time and space'
Time is more fundamental than space...Some theologians say that God is outside time, but it cannot be true of any personal God that he is timeless, for a personal God is conscious, and time is a concomitant of consciousness. Time is not only the concomitant of consciousness, but the process of actualization and the dimension of change...." (p.3).
rulz: a personal being, including God, must think, act, feel with succession, duration, sequence (i.e. time). The burden of proof is on you considering every page of Scripture and the life of God-Man Jesus proves this. As well, God is triune, so His reality would be the same before creation.
The Word of God declares that God came first. Before anything!
God is the same. Now and forever.
Hebrews 13:8
8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever.
You have just denied the incarnation and proof texted out of context. This is about constancy of character, not timelessness, not absolute immutability in every sense. A God that cannot change in some ways (cf. clock that would be right only 2x/day if it did not change) is not personal, but a rock.
You are buying into refuted Platonic ideas on perfection. Grow up.
At least God has used you to use the prefix "con" in the majority of all of your understanding of your posts.
He is not subject to the things He creates.He knows all time, even the beginning and end of it.
What is your biggest problem? Poor potty training?:dunce:
Isaiah 46:10
10 Declaring the end from the beginning,
And from ancient times things that are not yet done,
Saying, ‘My counsel shall stand,
And I will do all My pleasure,
Isaiah 46:11
11 Calling a bird of prey from the east,
The man who executes My counsel, from a far country.
Indeed I have spoken it;
I will also bring it to pass.
I have purposed it;
I will also do it.
It does you no good to attack me. Address the Bible.
I cannot reason with the unreasonable and you are not proving your point...you reject light, so I might as well rib you.
These verses are clear that it is His ability to bring to pass that is the issue, not prescience/FK.
I can tell you that in one hour I will drink milk. This is not foreknowledge, but intention that I bring to pass. I am not seeing me drink milk in an hour to declare this. I declare it, then bring it to pass. This is what God is saying, but you are wrongly importing your flawed ideas into the text and extrapolating it to all vs some cases.
Unless you deny free will, you should be agreeing with me.