Post of the day...Idiot variety

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lighthouse

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
IMJerusha said:
A Nickism if I've ever read one! :)
Click to expand...
It's a quote from a movie.

I am unaware of this.
Click to expand...
I think she wishes everyone was. It was in a thread on whether or not an 11 year old who became pregnant through gang rape should have an abortion or carry the child to term. Angel argued for the former.

here is the link that shows she voted "Yes" in the poll.

So they're even in their opinions. Hmm... What's all the fuss about?
Oh yeah, I remember, this was about Rusha stating that Nick enjoys living angry.
Click to expand...
It's actually about the fact that Rusha enjoys misrepresenting Nick.
 
Angel4Truth

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Nick M said:
Is it really that hard?



How does that saying go? And then you can kill the baby.
Click to expand...

You can falsely accuse me all you want. If you need to be that hateful, knock yourself out. Ive been gone for 4 days, you waited till i was on here to make another nasty comment that i dont believe when you could have done that 3 days ago.

I only agree with terminating a pregnancy when the life of the mother is at risk, and i dont believe all doctors are quacks who dont know what they are talking about. I dont believe in killing a mother and taking her from her family sorry.

If you need to do evil to sleep tonight, have at it.

Ive said plainly what i believe, take it or leave it, there will be no further comment from me.
 
glorydaz

glorydaz

Well-known member
Lighthouse said:
It's a quote from a movie.

I think she wishes everyone was. It was in a thread on whether or not an 11 year old who became pregnant through gang rape should have an abortion or carry the child to term. Angel argued for the former.

here is the link that shows she voted "Yes" in the poll.

It's actually about the fact that Rusha enjoys misrepresenting Nick.
Click to expand...

Well, here I go stepping out in front of a speeding truck. :doh:

You guys who insist you would NEVER do such and such should be on your knees praying you won't ever be faced with the hard decisions you insist others comply with. It would be one thing if you had an eleven year old that had been gang raped (even 5 yr. olds as I recall) and you decided to put her life at risk, but you have no right to insist others make the same decisions you MIGHT make. I say might because you have not had to make that decision. You don't KNOW what you would do. If you claim you do, you're only fooling yourself. Yeah, I was on that thread, and I was the object of your wrath, and now you're turning it on Angel.

It's a darn good thing we have the Holy Spirit dwelling in us else we might be stuck walking in whatever convictions you law makers deem proper. Those who seem willing to put the women and children at risk.....a risk you, yourselves, will never have to face. And all this over a hypothetical case. I hope you're proud of your "stance" because your treatment of your sisters in Christ is abysmal.

Oh, I'm sure in your eyes this proves we aren't saved at all. Happily for us, we know better. :carryon:
 
glorydaz

glorydaz

Well-known member
Angel4Truth said:
You can falsely accuse me all you want. If you need to be that hateful, knock yourself out. Ive been gone for 4 days, you waited till i was on here to make another nasty comment that i dont believe when you could have done that 3 days ago.

I only agree with terminating a pregnancy when the life of the mother is at risk, and i dont believe all doctors are quacks who dont know what they are talking about. I dont believe in killing a mother and taking her from her family sorry.

If you need to do evil to sleep tonight, have at it.

Ive said plainly what i believe, take it or leave it, there will be no further comment from me.
Click to expand...

:thumb:
 
Angel4Truth

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
glorydaz said:
Well, here I go stepping out in front of a speeding truck. :doh:

You guys who insist you would NEVER do such and such should be on your knees praying you won't ever be faced with the hard decisions you insist others comply with. It would be one thing if you had an eleven year old that had been gang raped (even 5 yr. olds as I recall) and you decided to put her life at risk, but you have no right to insist others make the same decisions you MIGHT make. I say might because you have not had to make that decision. You don't KNOW what you would do. If you claim you do, you're only fooling yourself. Yeah, I was on that thread, and I was the object of your wrath, and now you're turning it on Angel.

It's a darn good thing we have the Holy Spirit dwelling in us else we might be stuck walking in whatever convictions you law makers deem proper. Those who seem willing to put the women and children at risk.....a risk you, yourselves, will never have to face. And all this over a hypothetical case. I hope you're proud of your "stance" because your treatment of your sisters in Christ is abysmal.

Oh, I'm sure in your eyes this proves we aren't saved at all. Happily for us, we know better. :carryon:
Click to expand...

I read past that thread about the actual 11 year old girl, she was violently gang raped by a pack of Muslim men, and she was severely beaten, and she was a very small girl, doctors had stated that pregnancy would be life threatening for her due to her size, the state of her own reproductive development, the severe beating and brutal rape also having damaged her, these guys eager to false witness do not take into the consideration the life of THAT child already here.

That also is a case of the life of the mother being in jeopardy, so if they want to accuse me of saying to just kill a baby, let them answer to God for their blatant lies - because i believe all measures should be used for both, but sometimes thats just not possible as much as they claim it is, even claiming that most doctors dont know what they are talking about, its better to gamble with life and possibly lose BOTH.

I will not agree to just kill a woman to save a baby - i believe all efforts should be made to save them both but if comes down to the mother dying, a hard choice has to be made period.

Sick to see the blatant lies some push. They are just as much pharisees as those they preach against. Her case is also a case of the life of the mother, plain and simple.
 
Lighthouse

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
Angel4Truth said:
You can falsely accuse me all you want. If you need to be that hateful, knock yourself out. Ive been gone for 4 days, you waited till i was on here to make another nasty comment that i dont believe when you could have done that 3 days ago.

I only agree with terminating a pregnancy when the life of the mother is at risk, and i dont believe all doctors are quacks who dont know what they are talking about. I dont believe in killing a mother and taking her from her family sorry.

If you need to do evil to sleep tonight, have at it.

Ive said plainly what i believe, take it or leave it, there will be no further comment from me.
Click to expand...
Why is it so hard for you to understand that it is not necessary to intentionally/actively kill the child in order to save the mother in any of these circumstances?

glorydaz said:
Well, here I go stepping out in front of a speeding truck. :doh:

You guys who insist you would NEVER do such and such should be on your knees praying you won't ever be faced with the hard decisions you insist others comply with. It would be one thing if you had an eleven year old that had been gang raped (even 5 yr. olds as I recall) and you decided to put her life at risk, but you have no right to insist others make the same decisions you MIGHT make. I say might because you have not had to make that decision. You don't KNOW what you would do. If you claim you do, you're only fooling yourself. Yeah, I was on that thread, and I was the object of your wrath, and now you're turning it on Angel.

It's a darn good thing we have the Holy Spirit dwelling in us else we might be stuck walking in whatever convictions you law makers deem proper. Those who seem willing to put the women and children at risk.....a risk you, yourselves, will never have to face. And all this over a hypothetical case. I hope you're proud of your "stance" because your treatment of your sisters in Christ is abysmal.

Oh, I'm sure in your eyes this proves we aren't saved at all. Happily for us, we know better. :carryon:
Click to expand...

  1. You have made yourself a false accuser of the brethren in making your claim that in my eyes the two of you are not saved.
  2. I turned my "wrath" on Angel in that thread when it happened. Don't act like this is sudden.

Angel4Truth said:
I read past that thread about the actual 11 year old girl, she was violently gang raped by a pack of Muslim men, and she was severely beaten, and she was a very small girl, doctors had stated that pregnancy would be life threatening for her due to her size, the state of her own reproductive development, the severe beating and brutal rape also having damaged her, these guys eager to false witness do not take into the consideration the life of THAT child already here.

That also is a case of the life of the mother being in jeopardy, so if they want to accuse me of saying to just kill a baby, let them answer to God for their blatant lies - because i believe all measures should be used for both, but sometimes thats just not possible as much as they claim it is, even claiming that most doctors dont know what they are talking about, its better to gamble with life and possibly lose BOTH.

I will not agree to just kill a woman to save a baby - i believe all efforts should be made to save them both but if comes down to the mother dying, a hard choice has to be made period.

Sick to see the blatant lies some push. They are just as much pharisees as those they preach against. Her case is also a case of the life of the mother, plain and simple.
Click to expand...

Just to clarify the story aCW told never actually happened. Not to mention he never claimed the girl became pregnant from the supposed rape; he offered up a "what if".
 
Granite

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
It's obvious that either Nick misread what Angel wrote or deliberately tried to misrepresent her remarks. Either way, it blew up in his face and made him look more ridiculous than usual.
 
Angel4Truth

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Lighthouse said:
Just to clarify the story aCW told never actually happened. Not to mention he never claimed the girl became pregnant from the supposed rape; he offered up a "what if".
Click to expand...

ACW didnt "tell the story" Wizard of Oz posted a news article to this actually happening in Sweden. This is factual, not a hypothesis and many different doctors actually discussed this scenerio at the time, i dont base my thoughts on only my thoughts, i actually dig into things before i make an opinion, and my opinion agrees with other doctors about that girl.

Actual news article: http://www.barenakedislam.com/2012/...11-year-old-swedish-girl-in-public-bathhouse/

Actual op (not by ACW) http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3548004&postcount=1

I am being misrepresented by a few people. Ive always said also, that all measures should be taken to save both also but when that cant happen (and yes unbelieved by some, there are and have been and will continue to be very real cases where that CANT happen and we shouldnt kill them both or kill the mother and leave her other children without a mother), and that keeps being ignored, why, beats me.

Now anyone who wants to, can continue to misrepresent me, ive been abundantly clear but it seems when i am offline, something else untrue about what i think and how i came to my conclusion keeps getting posted.
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Tambora said:
Nothing to clear up.
Killing a baby is killing a baby.
What else would you call it?
Click to expand...

Tragic.

Do you consider the life of the mother any less than that of a child that could and likely would kill her if pregnancy came to fruition? If the only realistic recourse to save at least the mother would be to terminate then do you still see it as simplistically killing a baby if every other route to prevent that has been done?
 
Tambora

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Arthur Brain said:
Tragic.

Do you consider the life of the mother any less than that of a child
Click to expand...
No.

that could and likely would kill her if pregnancy came to fruition?
Click to expand...
The child makes no decision to kill the mother.



If the only realistic recourse to save at least the mother would be to terminate then do you still see it as simplistically killing a baby if every other route to prevent that has been done?
Click to expand...
If you make the decision to kill the child, then the child is going to be killed. Right?
 
Lighthouse

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
Angel4Truth said:
ACW didnt "tell the story" Wizard of Oz posted a news article to this actually happening in Sweden. This is factual, not a hypothesis and many different doctors actually discussed this scenerio at the time, i dont base my thoughts on only my thoughts, i actually dig into things before i make an opinion, and my opinion agrees with other doctors about that girl.

Actual news article: http://www.barenakedislam.com/2012/...11-year-old-swedish-girl-in-public-bathhouse/

Actual op (not by ACW) http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3548004&postcount=1

I am being misrepresented by a few people. Ive always said also, that all measures should be taken to save both also but when that cant happen (and yes unbelieved by some, there are and have been and will continue to be very real cases where that CANT happen and we shouldnt kill them both or kill the mother and leave her other children without a mother), and that keeps being ignored, why, beats me.

Now anyone who wants to, can continue to misrepresent me, ive been abundantly clear but it seems when i am offline, something else untrue about what i think and how i came to my conclusion keeps getting posted.
Click to expand...

  1. It is not necessary to kill the child if you cannot save it.
  2. Is there any corroboration to the story?
  3. The girl still didn't get pregnant in that story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top