Oh look, now someone else comes arguing about words that do not matter. Don't use/say the word 'saved'! Use the other word 'justified'? How about 'sanctified', or 'made holy', or 'made perfect'? How 'made righteous'?
You are arguing too about words that do not matter. Justified, made righteous, made holy, made perfect, and sanctified are all the same thing---and that happens when one is 'saved' has 'salvation'.
What don't you get about it is all the same and you should not argue about words?
No can do. it is the historic position of protestant evangelical theology since Luther that justification and transformation cannot be confused. The standard explanation goes like this:
There are two distinct aspects to God's redemptive activity:
1, Justification, what God has done in Christ historically for us (about our debt of sin)
2, Transformation, what God does in us through the Spirit (about sin's ongoing stain in our life)
You have made a fundamental error by not making distinctions. It was the RCC position, when responding to Luther, that #2 was the same thing as #1, and that a person was not saved unless they participated in the sacraments. It was called
gratia infusa because it was grace that occurred in a person's life.
There is nothing but confusion if this is taken to be what justification is. And there is no glory for Christ alone.