Cross Reference
New member
And if they all spoke the same unknown tongue, what difference would it have made?
And if they all spoke the same unknown tongue, what difference would it have made?
Are you asking me?
If so, please be more specific.
If you are referring to a meeting, "in the church" I Corinthians 14
then all spoke in tongues, other than the benefit to self, there is no benefit to the church, for if it does not communicate words easy to be understood, it is not edifying to the mind of the people there.
I Corinthians 14:5-20
Paul is concerned that people get edified in their minds, therefore they need to understand the words being said. Listening to people speak in a foreign language does nothing for me if I do not understand the words being said.
Although I have a very small familiarity with Lithuanian, that is, I can understand one word out of 100 in a conversation, that is not enough for me to involve myself in the conversation, I might as well find something else to do.
If I go to a church meeting and every one there is speaking in tongues, there is no benefit to my mind, for I do not understand a word being said.
I might as well go find a different setting and read my Bible alone.
At the least, I might learn something, even if I do not understand all that I am reading. But I cannot learn a thing from some one speaking in tongues for I will not understand a word, not one word, being said.
Unless that person interprets the tongues he just spoke, I Corinthians 14:13,5,26-28
All things are to be done that people are being edified, being in the church, we are to seek to edify.
I Corinthians 14:12 KJV
The idea that tongues are for edification of self is completely unfounded; it is precisely contrary to all that Paul was building toward in I Corinthians 12-14. The apostle went to great lengths to emphasize that spiritual gifts are for edification of others. He says in I Corinthians 12:7 that gifts are "for the common good." Paul's love song in I Corinthians 13 is so beautiful, in and of itself, that oatmeal have missed its very point: he is showing that gifts must be exercised in love, and if they are exercised in love they will be exercised for the benefit of others, not self. "Love seeketh not her own" (verse 5) but focuses on others. To exercise a gift simply for its personal benefit would be a prostitution of it.
1Co 9:13 Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar?
Also,
If you had ever prophesied then you would recognize the Spirit of tongues (if it was genuine)
And if they all spoke the same unknown tongue, what difference would it have made?
Since there are many tongues in this world, and none without significance, God would not limit those who speak in tongue to one language, for then those who do use that one language from understanding it, could not speak in tongues.
Some things can be said better in French than another language, some things can be best said in Swahili or Sioux or the tongues of angels.
Place it in any 'meeting' environment you wish. My question stands. If the Holy Spirit means it for you, what should that matter to you whether the speaker[such as Acts 2] speaks a language you can relate to or your hearing some strange tongue is made real to you that you understand??
It does not matter to me. What matters to me is that I speak in tongues much as instructed in I Corinthians 12-14
And, when "speaking" from/by the power of God, no language can sometimes, not be necessary.
You couldn't have made the cut if it was handed to you.
Your insults are not edifying.
I Corinthians 14:12
Romans 14:19
I am sure you can do better than insult people who are teaching God's word to you.
Nor is your purposeful willful ignorance accompanied by your conceit-arrogance.
It does not matter to me. What matters to me is that I speak in tongues much as instructed in I Corinthians 12-14
Paul was a Pentecostal Christian,
It seems like it.
that's why I don't like him much. Jesus did not talk about speaking in tongues.
:bang:
meshak, you just don't get it. Jesus Christ appeared to Paul, AFTER The Crucifiction and Resurrection. you are right to follow Jesus, but Jesus Himself, revealed the meaning of Christ and many other things to Paul. it's not mid-acts, it's the whole NT from Acts to Revelation. The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were about Jesus' earthly Ministry. they did not know of "preaching the Cross" yet. to completely follow Christ, you must know Paul's writings. and James, Peter, John, Luke and John of Patmos etc. you talk like everything stopped at Crucifiction. there was MORE meshak. read it. know it. Jesus didn't speak about what He told Paul. see ? - :bang:
Have you ever been filled with the Holy spirit?
All the first Christians were in Acts.
LA
After all that I have posted on this forum, and you want to ask me that??