drbrumley
Well-known member
i justify them on the basis that american lives were saved
Justify it however you wish.
i justify them on the basis that american lives were saved
The question is what you are talking about. I asked a direct question: "Where did I interpret either of those passages in regards to killing enemies?" I only posted two passages of scripture. Are you saying those two passages of scripture tell us that we should kill our enemies?
Justify it however you wish....short of an invasion of japan, no lives would have been lost. ,
think of all the lives that would have been saved if we'd surrendered after pearl harbor
fat man and little boy didn't come down from heaven, they were dropped from airplanes
and regardless of their tech, they were nothing more than big bombs - in fact, we have bigger non-nuke bombs in our arsenal right now
And the dew doesn't come down from heaven, it forms from the clouds.
Daniel 4:33 KJV
(33) The same hour was the thing fulfilled upon Nebuchadnezzar: and he was driven from men, and did eat grass as oxen, and his body was wet with the dew of heaven, till his hairs were grown like eagles' feathers, and his nails like birds' claws.
"Heaven" doesn't necessarily mean the throne of God. It also applies to the darkness that holds the stars and the sky that holds the birds and the weather. Fat Man and Little Boy certainly came down from the clouds.
But tell us about these bigger bombs. Are these owned by the USA? Has anyone else dropped these bigger bombs down from the sky yet?
On the contrary, it is opposite.
yeah they were bombing Godzilla, trying to kill him.
You no longer have the million man army or the nukes in that scenario. Instead I'll give you, Christian Avenger of the Kingdom, a special book. You have said that it is your right to judge who lives and dies and what counts as tyranny, so in this book if you write someone's name they will instantly die. It's more efficient than a gun. In this hypothetical scenario, do you use this book to carry through what you said you would do with force of arms?
Paul lived under a tyrannical regime that murdered Christians. He didn't advocate overthrowing the Roman government. Explain? Or are you saying that the REAL Christians (not Paul) did overthrow the government and we all missed it because the winners rewrote history?
Except those passages do not state the opposite either. They don't prove your point, they don't prove anyone's point, the only thing they were is the best that I could find as touching Christians in the military. The former was John's advice for soldiers that came to him as he laid the way for Christianity, and the latter was the conversion of a Gentile who happened to be a solider over other soldiers.
The point is that it isn't directly addressed for or against, but if anyone has something more applicable, that it is an invitation for them to bring it to the table. Short of what we had already laid down, as what is expected of a solider compared to what is expected of a Christian. "Love thy enemy' in the fulfillment of "thou shalt not kill" and all that.
Except those passages do not state the opposite either. They don't prove your point, they don't prove anyone's point, the only thing they were is the best that I could find as touching Christians in the military. The former was John's advice for soldiers that came to him as he laid the way for Christianity, and the latter was the conversion of a Gentile who happened to be a solider over other soldiers.
The point is that it isn't directly addressed for or against, but if anyone has something more applicable, that it is an invitation for them to bring it to the table. Short of what we had already laid down, as what is expected of a solider compared to what is expected of a Christian. "Love thy enemy' in the fulfillment of "thou shalt not kill" and all that.
It is not hard to see at all that His followers are not be armed. do you see any account that Jesus and His disciples killed anyone for self-defense? None.
It is not hard to see at all that His followers are not be armed. do you see any account that Jesus and His disciples killed anyone for self-defense? None.
Why are you arguing as if against me?
:think:
And He said to them, [JESUS]“When I sent you without money bag, knapsack, and sandals, did you lack anything?”[/JESUS] So they said, “Nothing.”Then He said to them, [JESUS]“But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one.For I say to you that this which is written must still be accomplished in Me: ‘And He was numbered with the transgressors.’ For the things concerning Me have an end.”[/JESUS]So they said, “Lord, look, here are two swords.” And He said to them, [JESUS]“It is enough.”[/JESUS] - Luke 22:35-38 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke22:35-38&version=NKJV
Why, oh why, Meshak, do you reject Jesus' words?
You reject His words.what am I rejecting?
You reject His words.
Jesus said to go buy a sword.
You said His followers shouldn't be armed.
What, you think a sword is for plowing a field?What makes you think they are for killing?
Your ignorance is showing.
What makes you think they are for killing?
Your ignorance is showing.