They are heavenly phrnomena, all created... And yes, they can be shown, but not unless they do the showing...
We anthropomorphize God in these kinds of formulaics, and indeed, God Himself does so, in condescension to us who only have our fallen conceptual understanding to rely upon...
You're insisting God does not shine. There is no qualification whatsoever for phaino that demands createdness.
God makes existent that which was not, and makes non-existent that which was. THEREFORE: Is God existent or non-existent? And the answer is: Neither... His Self-existence serves merely to differentiate Him from our contingency of existence...
I don't think this is the Orthodox position. But if it is, Orthodoxy is nothing more than Platonism at its foundation.
Ego eimi.
Likewise with the existence and non-existence of consciousness in creation... We possess the Image of God in OUR created self-awareness... We can have no clue as to what that may mean in its Divine Essential and Original Form...
Basically, you disannul the Incarnate Logos as God's expression. He didn't stutter.
The problem of saying that God is non-existence should be self-evident.
God tells us: "My thoughts are not your thoughts..."
No. You add much, insisting on cataphatics AND apophatics that are inapplicable.
You refer to musterion and the closed lips, yet there is plenty of speaking and declaring what and who God is. It's hypocritical and convenient double standards.
We take Him at His word...
No, but you sure think you do.
He is the Creator of Phenomenon/a...
This partial truth paralyzes you.
A Ford automobile cannot reason backwards from its steering wheel to the emotional life of Henry Ford...
I'm not reasoning, and God isn't a created man who manufactured an inanimate mechanical object with no nous to intuit and commune in hypostatic union with God's Logos while partaking of His divine nature and being renewed in the Spirit of the mind.
Orthodoxy is beyond shallow in these things, presuming to be profound.
Then you believe God is created,
No, but you just said He's non-existent and created existence, Plato.
because ALL phenomena are created...
Phaino requires an underlying reality. That's a hypostasis. You add to the word AND subtract from the word.
A Self-phenomenon of uncreated existence, when existence is created by a Creator who is beyond existence and non-existence, is self-contradictory...
The silliness you just wrote is self-contradictory and Platonic.
I think we would reject such a notion as anthropomorphizing the nature of God the Creator from nature of creation...
No you wouldn't. You've made an anthropomorphic set of triplets and keyed on the English word "Person" (all of whom would be distinct beings in English).
THAT proof is in the Life lived, and not in a doctrine professed...
Then I guess there shouldn't be all this declared Orthodox doctrine. You can't be constantly playing both ends against the middle. All you're promoting is idle rhema, for which every man will give account.
You walkin' on water these days?
Are you? Is anyone?
Well, if it isn't, and you are wrong, what then? It is worse... It is a noetic infusion that is either from God or is NOT from God...
You just presume that there is no noetic infusion from God contrary to the silliness of Orthodox double-speak.
Apophatics deconstructed the neo-Platonism of Greece and all the pre-Socratics...
Yet you're espousing Platonism at the foundation, with a non-existent God who isn't even Self-Conscious.
That sounds strange... Jesus revealed HIMSELF to His followers, and He is a Person...
Yep.
And in this, He revealed that God is Person...
Yep.
And that Jesus, Who IS God, was obedient to His Father,
Yep.
so that there are two Persons Who are One God....
Nope.
And the same with the Holy Spirit, making Three...
Nope.
Who are One God... We do not pretend to know HOW this is, simply THAT it is...
Sure you do. It's intricately formulated. That's just naive or disingenuous.
You'd be better off saying less.
We re saying that ALL of these terms pertain to creation, and not to the Creator, although they CAN be used to help us who are fallen in a fallen creation to know Who God IS...
That's human limitation, especially when God revealed Himself by His own Logos as the Son.
You also say God is non-existent. And you deny the very meaning of phaino.
And we do well... But this existence, whatever it may be, is not anything we even begin to understand...
Then why have you? And why has any Orthodox ever spoken if musterion is the closed mouth? Double standards.
We can say that God's existence is "Unconditional Transcendent, Self-Conscious Self-Existence" and give it a drum roll and trumpets and a choral halelulia, and we still don't know Schnartz about God...
Right. And we could posture with apophatics while declaring much, and be hypocrites who still don't know Schnartz about God.
You want both sides.
"My THOUGHTS are NOT your thoughts..."
Then the Orthodox should have NO thoughts.
Noumena is a created phenomenon of the human heart... The Nous is the Eye of the Heart... It is the director of the intelligence... It is Janus-faced, in that it can be scattered among the phenomena of existence, or it can be concentrated into the Love of God in ongoing purification of the Heart...
God is not a product of our noumenal existence... And indeed, demons have noetic access to our bodies and souls...
This should alarm the Orthodox instead of warning everyone else while ignoring yourselves.
The Nous of man can perceive both God and Creation insofar as God is willing to be seen... And insofar as we have enough purity of heart to see Him...
Oh, now we can know Him by revelation and permission. Convenient that it's only the Orthodox to which this applies.
I mean, answering you, God CREATED noumenal existence in man... And of course He can access it... But this does not mean that God has His "existence" in some category of creation known as "Noumenological Phenomenology" or whatever...
Ummm... I didn't say anything remotely representative of this. You just want to deny anyone else has intuitive knowledge except the Orthodox who have these double standards and double-speak.
Oh He is the Great I AM, no question, but for us, to whom this conceptual and verbal condescension was given, to sieze upon it and think we KNOW God because we can UNDERSTAND the meaning of the words, just won't cut it...
Arsenios
That's why I don't do that, but the Orthodox do.
Orthodoxy has specified three hypostases, not me. Orthodoxy has cataphatically declared boatloads of stuff while refusing others to do so.
You can't see the paradoxes and double standards from within.