That is right they are the same.
Now you finally get it.
Right Divider does get it and it is not 'finally'.
You don't.
That is right they are the same.
Now you finally get it.
That's what I keep telling you, but you refuse to believe it.
Three PERSONS; one GOD.
According to your bogus story, the Father talks to Himself. The Bible says that the Son talks to His Father.
She's a modalist that will never understand the truth.Look again. Trinitarian doctrine does not say 'separate'.
Yes, distinct means different.
Did you ever notice that there is a difference between a father and a son?
Distinct does not mean separate.
Right Divider does get it and it is not 'finally'.
You don't.
She's a modalist that will never understand the truth.
Her "god" puts on a mask and talks to himself.
Look again. Trinitarian doctrine does not say 'separate'.
Yes, distinct means different.
Did you ever notice that there is a difference between a father and a son?
Distinct does not mean separate.
God the Father really came as a Man He did not pretend to.
Not only that, Jesus did not speak to God for Himself, he spoke to God so that we can know from whom he came.
Matt 26:39 (AKJV/PCE)(26:39) And he went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou [wilt].
Is the Son praying to His Father or is "the Father with a body" praying to Himself?
Steko thinks he has efficiently debated me.
There is no way Jesus is ever distinct from the Father.
They are so much alike that Jesus ONLY says what the Father says.
They are so much alike that Jesus ONLY does what the Father does.
They are so not distinct that when you see Jesus you can say, "I see the Father".
Yeah, Steko's chief goal in life is to defeat GT and be proud of it. :chuckle:
Then, the Bible shouldn't ever make any distinction between the Father and the Son.
Then the Bible shouldn't use terms of distinction.
She's a modalist that will never understand the truth.
Her "god" puts on a mask and talks to himself.
You're just too dense for words.
Yep, but she can't stand to be labeled or categorized.
There is truth said in jest.
There is no distinction.
The Bible does not, but your false doctrine does.
From my original post "HaShem" - the NAME of GOD: And he said unto me, Son of man [Ezekiel], the place of MY THRONE, and the place of the soles of MY feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the children of Israel forever, and MY HOLY NAME, shall the house of Israel NO MORE DEFILE - Ezekiel 43:7
Someday MESSIAH will dwell in your midst and you will no longer DEFILE His HOLY NAME.
She probably has no understanding of the two natures that Jesus had while on earth. That could explain a lot of her confusion.Yeah, Steko's chief goal in life is to defeat GT and be proud of it. :chuckle:
Then, the Bible shouldn't ever make any distinction between the Father and the Son.
No argument.
Then the Bible shouldn't use terms of distinction.
GodRight Divider, Who raised Jesus?