glorydaz
Well-known member
"tit for tat" is a child's game, glorydaz.
So is this childish "outrage" I'm seeing from you gals, Anna.
"tit for tat" is a child's game, glorydaz.
So is this childish "outrage" I'm seeing from you gals, Anna.
Just because you say it's "childish outrage" doesn't make it so, glorydaz.
And just because you think you're right, doesn't mean you are.
And in your carefully indirect acknowledgement that rape is an effective learning tool, you're very, very wrong.
Having said that, if you're having a hard time talking to me, I'll make it easy for you and allow you the last word, and I'll direct my posts to other commenters.
Sometimes it is. Especially when you're dealing with the natural man. What exactly is one to expect from the ungodly?
Rape isn't a natural consequence. It's a choice someone makes.
I'm having a hard time even wanting to talk to you, Anna. Like all libs it's nearly impossible to reason with you. And, from what I'm seeing, some of you gals are simply beside yourselves.
I said being raped wouldn't destroy a person. A person can only be "destroyed" by something like rape if they allow themselves to wallow in self pity. I would say the same thing to my daughter or my best friend. And don't you dare tell me that kind of talk would "destroy" someone because I've seen that same straight talk help others in my life. Now, I don't give a rip if you like that or not.
I'm saying that every event in life is an effective learning tool and I don't give a rip if you like that or not, either.
I hope that is clear enough.
Well, you are a right hard hearted piece of work!
Yes I know....I'm despicable and outrageously arrogant. Thank you very much, Bybee, for letting me see so clearly what your personal feelings are. I also know why you have them.
It is quite evident that you know quite a bit.
But it is also quite evident that you are almost completely lacking in wisdom.
I did not ever say nor do I think you are despicable.
You are abrasively opinionated.
What is evident is that you can hurl insults all you want to, but I'm not supposed to even give my opinion. Do you ever stop and read what you post? Ever?
You said that what I had said was the most despicable thing you had ever heard. But of course you won't quote what I actually said and then try and defend your statement. It's what YOU HEARD in your own small "opinionated" mind that offended you.
So, if you want to keep slinging insults back and forth, I'm pretty sure I can keep up with you until you get mad and ban me. You do have that power....which may be why you have changed so much from the way you were to the way you are now.
Hope what you like. I know for a fact that God does not intervene on countless occasions because He is allowing us to reap what we have sown. Rape is no different than many of the other painful things God allows us to endure as we have many lessons to learn. One of those lessons must certainly be NOT TO entice men to sin by our behavior. You may not like it. You may like to claim that rape is somehow a special circumstance for which no woman can ever be held responsible for her own actions. I don't. I view it like any other mistake in judgment that we should and do learn to avoid.
What you have just said is one of the most despicable things I've ever hear another woman say.
The things that I have addressed to you are my considered opinion in response to the the things you have spoken here.
Well, you are a right hard hearted piece of work!
They are not insults. They are observations.
The level of discussion at which you operate does not anger me.
I have no desire to get into a mud-slinging match with you.
I'm quite sure you would win.
Congratulations on not succumbing to group think on this issue. Regardless of what people say about your stand, you are very brave. Not as brave as in real life but cyber brave for sure. Too many people let popular opinion guide their thinking at a subconscious level at least.
You remind me of someone... Voltaire/Doloresistere, maybe?
I don't think some understand what rape is.
Herewith, a Philadelphia magazine report about Swarthmore College, where in 2013 a student “was in her room with a guy with whom she’d been hooking up for three months”: “They’d now decided — mutually, she thought — just to be friends. When he ended up falling asleep on her bed, she changed into pajamas and climbed in next to him. Soon, he was putting his arm around her and taking off her clothes. ‘I basically said, “No, I don’t want to have sex with you.” And then he said, “OK, that’s fine” and stopped. . . . And then he started again a few minutes later, taking off my panties, taking off his boxers. I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.’” Six weeks later, the woman reported that she had been raped. |
A female student in the dorms invited a male friend over to her dorm room. They were in the room alone with the door closed. He had just come from playing basketball and was wearing shorts and a t-shirt, she was wearing flannel jammies. They started making out on her bed, his hands went places she was ok with at first, but then thought better of and tried to stop. He didn't stop and continued, she didn't cry out for help and afterwards claimed rape. |
sod wants to blame victims of rape for their rapes
anna said:, the same way he called the massacred students cowards.
No one here lacks sympathy for actual rape victims. Not even Sod (I think).
I do not wish to dilute responsibility for behavior. The minute one places blame on a victim responsibility is diluted for the aggressor.
Known to be risky, by whom?no, anna, i've been very clear about this
i want it recognized that their behavior/choices/actions, if performed in a manner that puts them in a situation that is known to be risky, is directly responsible for the inevitable consequences of that risk
The problem with this theory is that it assumes the risk of rape to be the woman's responsibility to recognize and avoid. Rather than it being the man's responsibility not to engage in.if their behavior was directly responsible for them to be in a risky situation, and they ignored sound advice and warnings (such as "I wouldn't take that roofie if i were you") then no, i don't have a whole lot of sympathy
no, anna, i've been very clear about this
i want it recognized that their behavior/choices/actions, if performed in a manner that puts them in a situation that is known to be risky, is directly responsible for the inevitable consequences of that risk
i've been clear about this too, anna
not all of them, only the ones who acted cowardly
it depends
if their behavior was directly responsible for them to be in a risky situation, and they ignored sound advice and warnings (such as "I wouldn't take that roofie if i were you") then no, i don't have a whole lot of sympathy
I'll demonstrate it later this morning in my On Responsibility thread (if i don't get banned for all the insults I flung in this post :noid
My take on the premise of this thread? The author was seeking validation for rapists whenever the victim has behaved foolishly or provocatively.
We could just use the excuse ok doser uses ....... He was asking for it. He is just as guilty.