glorydaz
Well-known member
You guys are missing the point of this thread. Giving God offence is not the issue.
Offensive words?
- Thread starter Tambora
- Start date
- Status
You guys are missing the point of this thread. Giving God offence is not the issue.
glorydaz
Well-known member
She meant Psalm 82:6 and John 10:34
Not necessarily...
Tam didn't exactly specify who it would need to be offensive to...
glorydaz
Well-known member
Read the OP again.
This is the post I replied to:
glorydaz
Well-known member
Oh, well I'm thinking you went too far back considering we're talking about "society".
The word "created" must have thrown you off.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
"Dogs" and "children" were appropriated, so they don't count. Mk7:27KJV Lk7:32KJV
But maybe "fool." Lk11:40KJV Lk24:25KJV
When was it created? Ps14:1KJV
Nope. That's just your insecurity getting the best of you, again.
Not even a little true, which is why you'll write it but never find an illustration for it.
There's nothing brave about posting anonymously on the internet, no matter how you do it.
Nope. Same challenge that you won't meet.
Flowery speech it usually the way someone describes their own limitations as a writer or humorist, if indirectly.
I would never be dull enough to believe that, let alone think it.
You should consider that as a motto.
glorydaz
Well-known member
It's time to put off childish things, Town.
No one is buying your crap...so stop dishing it out.
glorydaz
Well-known member
A fool is the best description for a foolish person, so that can't count.
That has been assumed by some and the rational seems sensible. Problem is the word had its most salient meaning in the South, particularly around the Georgia northern hill country and west into Alabama and northwest Mississippi for folks who eschewed modern life, in favour of a rustic existence, away from then new central authority, as seem with making liquor and hunting and fishing without seasons.
They are often depicted as backwoods hillbillies, yet there is a difference between crackers and the hill-folk of the Appalachian mountains.
Some trace the word "cracker' to the manual cracking of corn. The word is more used to identify those who prefer rural anonymity and a preference for a more solitary life close to nature. There are very few identified crackers left in the US and the use of the word, as used, is moribund today, such being its fluid use and misuse.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Well, I tried. :idunno:
glorydaz
Well-known member
It was a great try, too. :thumb:
I'm giving up Connect 4 for Lent.
Like I said, you can declare anything, but you'll never back it up with more. And when pressed to, this is the best you have in your quiver.
Telling.
Supra.
glorydaz
Well-known member
I wouldn't bother to draw an arrow from my quiver when facing a Clown such as you. I'd merely chuckle and point as I went on my way.
Need I really say anything more? :sigh:
You can't draw what you never had.
No, but when has not having anything to say stopped you?
glorydaz
Well-known member
Says every fool who cannot see.
I'm never detoured by a piece of crap in my path, and will always call it what it is.
I know that chaps your little hiney. :chuckle:
You should put a "So mote it be," or something behind that. Really give it heft.
lain:What's really funny about that is that while you can't manage to produce the support for your whole, "You think you're superior," shtick, you do make a decent inferential case about you in that regard.
Or, the person who can judge a fool must be superior to the fool, or at least think they are.
The person who says that feels comfortably superior too.
So that's funny.
I know how frustrated you are by how quickly you go to this sort of bit.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
i find cracker to be a good description for one who is dirt-poor
i don't find it any more offensive than dirt-poor :idunno:
and with it come certain expectations of values, morals and norms
same as ni66er :idunno:
- Status