Not at all.
Breaker's view is right out of the writings of those great men of Acts 2 Dispensationalism - men like William R. Newell, and Miles J. Standford.
Which is basically C. I. Scofield, of the well-known Scofield Reference Bible.
Profound as they had been within what they had understood, Scofield (and these other men) never did completely see the distinction between Peter and Paul / Israel and the Body that such men assert in their writings.
Way over my head.
I doubt it.
I'm too fascinated by all views not to look into them in-depth as to of what sort each is actually comprised of.
In contrast, people like you on here (ever opposed to Mid-Acts) have yet to show you even know what basics all MADs hold to in common * let alone, on what basis.
___________________
* regardless of our at times vastly different understandings within Mid-Acts on distinctions between things within the more advanced levels of Mid-Acts.
Different understandings between MADs which actually point back to the existence of a difference in study approach that was not noticed, and that, in time resulted in a view on one thing or another that is a departure from that long settled within Mid-Acts.
In other words, all MADs learn the same basic beginner info.
Very few have come to the position on their own - most have learned it from someone.
What is not really taught is the study approach that resulted in said same standard beginner info.
Most figure some, or more, of what those principles are, on their own, over time.
Unaware at a conscious level that that is what they have done.
I ask many of the MADs about that, that I keep in contact with - most of whom are Pastors. Very few are consciously aware of the study approach they are applying as they set out to study out one thing or another.
It is more like they have figured those out unaware that they have - as is often the case within any profession.
The pizza maker just makes his pizza. Time at it has resulted in refinements for the better - in some pizza makers.
In contrast, the Master Chef is consciously aware of the interaction between all the various ingredients, the flame, the size of the oven, and a gillion other distinctions.
Likewise with MAD.
Some MADs, end up unaware they have gradually veered away from the study approach the basic distinctions are based on, and as a result, gradually end up approaching the study of a thing unaware they are no longer applying the study principles the basic beginner info is built on.
Because that is not taught, other than to a limited degree, within Mid-Acts Based Pastor trainings (normally about three to four years within most Mid-Acts Based Pastor trainings).
And even that, as someone like former Acts 9er, Ivan Burgenor, now an Acts 28er, is no guarantee that one who is not careful, will not end up having departed from the standard study approach.
The same happened within Acts 2 Dispensationalism after Darby.
The result being that the very basic approach that Darby had actually based his recovery of the Dispensational Approach on (and that every - single - Darby opponent I have read is clearly clueless of), ceased to continue the continuing process of refinement that would have allowed Acts 2 Dispys to eventually arrive at Mid-Acts.
It took an outsider, as usual, to begin to see that Acts 2 Dispensationalism long ceased in its' recovering of what little they had only begun to recover.
Above my head?
Good one, 1 Mind.
I have long forgotten much I long ago sorted out about Things That Differ within Scripture on these things that you and your kind on here have yet to even get a glimpse of.
While I'm at it "I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh" Romans 6:19A.
Not mad at ya, mind you, just M.A.D.
Romans 5:6-11.