Mulla Sadra
Member
You may be the first theist who believes science completely confirms their God, why do you think so many oppose science and its findings?
Why are those who accept science fully... normally not so invested in a deity?
No no, the translation is fine, however it may work to your disadvantage, there's another word for "subjective logic" it's called delusion.
I'll consider reading that book after I've read the first few pages, but books that try to proselytise have little credibility or efficacy upon me.
Even your condescending fallacies aren't that damning, you can't even get enough sects together for an argumentum ad populum, it works against you, strangely.
If it must be so that Christianity accompanies democracy and westernisation, then I'd happily force that upon Islamic states, at least their oil-reliant economics will diverge and thrive, perhaps women can be a little less subservient also.
But it would be better if these nasty and capricious fairy tales vanished.
1- A monotheist God, more than sure, but a personal one, I can find Science saying Masturbation is good and Islam says it is not, I can find it saying Dog might be clean, Islam doesn't, I can find the story of Adam (Somewhat) doubted if compared to Science - even I am an evolutionist and don't think it is -.
but logically any kind of Scientific breakthrough means there's a God.
2- invested in what ?
3- Ok
4- it is not.
5- Christianity is not Islam.