SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
He does tell good fairy tales though.
Perhaps he should become a "real writer" of fairy tales.
Agreed.
But when speaking of Bible things, he needs to cast down his vain imaginations.
He does tell good fairy tales though.
Perhaps he should become a "real writer" of fairy tales.
D'ism invented the 2nd program when it failed to realize that Paul was speaking retroactively in Rom 4 and Gal 3-4 about the Seed of Abraham. The Gospel was preached in advance. The Judaism that Paul grew up in had switched that promise for the Law, the original RT. The prophesied work of the Spirit comes through the Gospel, not the Law.
Never! It's a complete waste of time.Heir,
when is the last time you talked, wrote, spoke in Koine?
No, plain English.What you are saying is mindless.
Unbeliever.The originals had to be handed down, and translated. There is a science of translation, of getting as close as possible to the original meaning.
It has EVERYTHING to do with the LORD. You act as if it was too hard for the LORD to preserve His words. There is NOTHING too hard for the LORD Psalms 12:6-7 KJV, 2 Timothy 3:16-17 KJV.It takes lexicons; lexicons are written collections of the best examples of unique meanings of words, as early as research can find them used, so that we know what the meant originally. It has nothing to do with the 2 Tim 3 doctrine.
Your pride gets in the way of your ability to reason and learnThere is no other reason for him to say 'in advance' than to persuade those in Judaism at his time that the real structure of their Bible was about the Gospel of justification. He had to persuade them that they had replaced what was promised with the Law.
You can't do it yourselfso interp Gal 3:17 for me.
so interp Gal 3:17 for me.
Your pride gets in the way of your ability to reason and learn
You can't do it yourself
Of course I can, you obtusity. What matters is that I fix the detail in your view of it that has it mucked up. I can only do that if you tell me what you think it is saying. You just think you are right without articulation; you are scared of details. this kind of evasion happens all the time with D'ists. If they go into details, their view crumbles like old soggy cookies.
you are scared of details.
Your pride gets in the way of your ability to reason and learn
so interp Gal 3:17 for me.
Break it down for us geniusNow that'd be something - PJ actually breaking a passage like Gal. 3:17 down :chuckle:
Break it down for us genius
Break it down for us genius
I read some commentaries, like you and IP. I like Matthew Henry's concise commentaryI can - you know I can, and then some - and I have.
Sometime back, in reply to IP's store bought notions.
Question is, when will you do more than brownnose the hybrids and post your own, actual contribution about one subject or another.
It is obvious you are unable to.
No harm in that; nor in admitting to it.
Give it a shot, PJ - only by getting in the water will you learn to swim.
lol - you know I'll have something to say about it.
But in the spirit of Proverbs 27:17.
I read some commentaries, like you and IP. I like Matthew Henry's concise commentary
The promise to Abraham and his seed are still in effect, not annulled by the law given to Moses. Mixing the promises and the law is a no-noWhat does he say about Gal 3:17?