Practice?
Allow them to break rules and sign Kevin Durant an Russell Westbrook.
Practice?
James is doing his part, but Love needs to up his production and the rest of the team needs to play the way they did against Toronto.I guess they need a lot of practice?
A very, very, very good team. On average the best team in the NBA today.Tsk, tsk, tsk...still not a believer I see.
So I can move on to football.
How exactly are the Cavs going to win four of five games to win the title?
The Cuyahoga River fire of 1969. Gotta love Cleveland.
James is doing his part, but Love needs to up his production and the rest of the team needs to play the way they did against Toronto.
A very, very, very good team. On average the best team in the NBA today.
But I look at the roster and don't think the match up favors GS against, say, the 95-96 Bulls. The Warriors would have an edge at center, but not a dominating one. I'll take Rodman in a close call at PF leaning into a push, Pippen in nothing like a close call at SF, Jordan by an even larger margin at SG and Curry swings the needle back a little at point.
The difference in GS in the playoffs has been bench play and mental toughness. Those wouldn't be an edge against that Bulls team. They moved and acted like another Dream Team in terms of confidence and they had players like Kerr and Kukoc coming off the bench. I'll look at a few of the other teams I noted later on. One of the better teams I've seen though, in any event.
So without a doubt, I can say the Golden State Warriors would beat the ’96 Chicago Bulls with or without the rules of hand checking![/I]
Jordan's Bulls never had any competition. They are extremely overrated because of Jordan.
Jordan couldn't guard Allen Iverson.
Sure, but first some hockey and Pittsburgh.
As I've stated many times, I'm not a hockey fan. However, the Pittsburgh Penguins are now one game away from winning the Stanley Cup, and I of course, jump on the bandwagon.
The Warriors would beat the 96' Bulls 4-0
:chuckle:
You have a Jordan bias.
Jordan grew up in North Carolina, you grew up in North Carolina
Jordan went to North Carolina, you live in North Carolina.
Jordan owns the Charlotte Hornets, you live near Charlotte.
:chuckle:
Finally, something you are less objective about than football.The Warriors would beat the 96' Bulls 4-0
Not many people who don't care will bother to argue. I've seen the greatest teams of the modern era play. I watched Bird and Magic going at it. I watched the Bulls finally get past the Pistons and assume the mantel. The only team I've ever rooted for in basketball, or ever really will, is the Boston Celtics. They're mine. So GS or Chic doesn't matter to me in the final analysis except as a product of a final analysis...and then I'm taking my best Celtics team to give either a scare.The debate of the current Warriors versus the great teams of the past has been raging on for a few months now. But the arugment is usally only referenced from people who have a very biased take on this debate.
I think it was harder to play well in, but I don't know that it was better. Different.Of course players from the 1980's-90's will always say their era was better.
Who'd he win his rings with? Eddie Johnson wants to sell books. He'll sell a lot more with that line than he would otherwise. Ceballos thinks his 93-94 Suns team would beat Golden State.Only one player, Eddie Johnson, has actually taken the time to reseach this from both sides and who admitted that the Warriors could hang with the 95-86 Bulls.
Like getting an opinion of the prom king from the girl he said no to on Daisy Duke day. :think:Johson played against Jordan's Bulls so he saw them up close and personal. Johnson compared the ENTIRE rosters and not just the top 3 players.
That's not how you spell delusions.CONCLUSIONS
A two man squad nearly and arguably should have beaten them. lain: The Jazz had more with Horny, Pasty, and the Mailman than OKC. Okay, they have a very athletic team and that team plays like one. I still say the Jazz would give them fits.When you break down this contest, it is obvious the Bulls will have a distinct advantage when it comes to key core players, but I don’t think that Bulls squad ever faced a team that could throw five players on the floor who could all run, pass, shoot and defend like Golden State has with Curry, Thompson, Green, Barnes and Iguodala.
I think expansion has watered down every sport it's touched, including the NBA. I don't think Bird would feel intimidated by this team. Magic's best Lakers teams wouldn't...and Jordan's Bulls aren't going to lose any sleep.I'd take the best San Antonio's to give GS all they can handle. That would probably be the closest to an old school team concept that's still on the floor, though they're not what they were a few years ago.This is why it’s so difficult to compare eras. With the different defensive rules now, it thoroughly throws a monkey wrench into trying to figure out which team would win.
No one is saying they couldn't play. That's a straw man. Many are saying it would have negatively impacted their play and that seems fair.I will say this: The belief that these Warriors could not play with hand checking is a myth.
That's not really an argument. It's just magic talk. Rules absolutely impact the game play. True in the NFL and true in the NBA.Champions come about because of a tenacious desire to excel and rules changes have nothing to do with individuals who pushed to the limit to succeed. This Warrior group is athletic, strong-willed, unselfish and skillful.
Does anyone really believe that someone who was beaten by a great team finds it difficult to put the lightest possible negative spin, the most carefully couched diminishing of that team's luster? I mean anyone sober.It’s almost impossible to go against that Chicago team. It’s got a serious hold on me because I played against them often as a member of the Indiana Pacers that season.
He's wrong, but for reasons given prior (I love Toni and Kerr coming on as bench players and the Bulls faced running teams that passed the ball too). Curry would be driven inside and hammered by Rodman or harassed by the long arms of the Bulls on the outside.Yes, I totally believe hand checking would bother the Warriors, but I also believe the Bulls only had three players in Jordan, Pippen and Rodman that were quick and strong enough to get their hands on a Warriors team with 10 quick and productive players.
Just not true. Pippen is an all time great who still doesn't quite get what he's owed because Jordan was so ridiculously skilled as both a scorer and a defender. In 93-94, without Jordan Pippen led the Bulls to 55 wins. And he missed ten of the first twelve games to an injury. Otherwise they could have easily been in the 60 plus win category...did I mention that was without Jordan?The one advantage the Bulls have is Michael Jordan and without a doubt he could will the Bulls to victory with his usual spectacular game…
At that point anyone taking him seriously should realize he's just selling. Several players on one team who could guard the greatest offensive player in NBA history?Then again, did Jordan ever face a team that could actually guard him with seven different players? The modern-day Warriors could do that and then make him work defensively no matter who he was guarding.
You have a Jordan bias.
Jordan grew up in North Carolina, you grew up in North Carolina
Jordan went to North Carolina, you live in North Carolina.
Jordan owns the Charlotte Hornets, you live near Charlotte.
:chuckle: