Sorry, no link for my own personal experience, believe me or not.
My fantasy. And a question for liberals
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
Sorry, no link for my own personal experience, believe me or not.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, with subjective anecdotes there's still nothing really to address.
Then why did you?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Because I was hoping to have something concrete to comment on. Now that I know there isn't let's just drop it.
There are 50 states and a mosaic of laws, perhaps there's hope somewhere?
Ok I'll play.
OK
Good point, since prison became a for profit business we've seen tons of abuse.
Maybe pare that down a bit, I know alot of people that I wouldn't want running around with a hammer let alone a gun.
Any others? Just get it out there, how bout Mormons or Atheists?
So keep your money and take care of your self.
And donate to charity for the poor if your so inclined?
Did you just read Atlas Shrugged?
They could all have free stuff!
Ask the woman that does the talking for you (nicholsmom) what doctrine our criminal justice system comes from Aaron.
(I'll give you both a hint: Judeo-Christian).
ACW can't stay away from this thread because it has the word fantasy -
WizardofOz
New member
I know you're a bit slow but we were discussing theocracy. Is that what our founders intended?
I see there are some Libertarians in this thread pj; you must feel right at home.
Christian Liberty
Well-known member
The US Constittuion is an idolatrous, wicked document. I couldn't care less what it says. (more later.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Ask the woman that does the talking for you (nicholsmom) what doctrine our criminal justice system comes from Aaron.
(I'll give you both a hint: Judeo-Christian).
nicholsmom as seen in the bold section of your copy and paste, is suggesting that mercy replace the rule of law. In the legal world that's considered anarchy Aaron.
Our government is one that protects the freedom of religious expression - within the bounds of lawful living. That means that Christians who think we need to set up our criminal justice system to match the one-time Israeli theocracy have no right to force that on those Christians who think we should let mercy guide judgment.
Should mercy replace judgment in our Judeo-Christian based criminal justice system Aaron?
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Ask the woman that does the talking for you (nicholsmom) what doctrine our criminal justice system comes from Aaron.
(I'll give you both a hint: Judeo-Christian).
nicholsmom as seen in the bold section of your copy and paste, is suggesting that mercy replace the rule of law. In the legal world that's considered anarchy Aaron.
Our government is one that protects the freedom of religious expression - within the bounds of lawful living. That means that Christians who think we need to set up our criminal justice system to match the one-time Israeli theocracy have no right to force that on those Christians who think we should let mercy guide judgment.
Should mercy replace judgment in our Judeo-Christian based criminal justice system Aaron?
You are aware that the constitution that you hate so much gives the citizens of the United States unalienable rights that come from God?
WizardofOz
New member
:doh:
You either can't read, can't comprehend what you're reading or are engaging in intellectually dishonest quote mining to fit your agenda.
Right after the section you quoted: "It means that not all of your religious beliefs become law, and not all of my religious beliefs become law. We decide together - and that includes people of all religions who are citizens - what will and will not become law."
She was never endorsing anarchy you simpleton.
Get your eyes checked. :loser:
Again (because you're slower than usual today) we're discussing theocracy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
nicholsmom as seen in the bold section of your copy and paste, is suggesting that mercy replace the rule of law. In the legal world that's considered anarchy Aaron.
Quote: Originally posted by someone named "nicholsmom"
Our government is one that protects the freedom of religious expression - within the bounds of lawful living. That means that Christians who think we need to set up our criminal justice system to match the one-time Israeli theocracy have no right to force that on those Christians who think we should let mercy guide judgment.
Should mercy replace judgment in our Judeo-Christian based criminal justice system Aaron?
(Aaron seems exceptionally angry tonight).
Why do you think that the woman who does your speaking for you used the word "mercy"? Mercy is only used in sentencing and has absolutely nothing to do with the type of criminal justice system this nation has.
Regarding nicholsmom's statement:
We decide together - and that includes people of all religions who are citizens - what will and will not become law
I see, so Christians and Jews should work together with Muslims and atheists/secular humanists to decide which laws work best for our society?
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
nicholsmom as seen in the bold section of your copy and paste, is suggesting that mercy replace the rule of law. In the legal world that's considered anarchy Aaron.
Quote: Originally posted by someone named "nicholsmom"
Our government is one that protects the freedom of religious expression - within the bounds of lawful living. That means that Christians who think we need to set up our criminal justice system to match the one-time Israeli theocracy have no right to force that on those Christians who think we should let mercy guide judgment.
Should mercy replace judgment in our Judeo-Christian based criminal justice system Aaron?
(Aaron seems exceptionally angry tonight).
Why do you think that the woman who does your speaking for you used the word "mercy"? Mercy is only used in sentencing and has absolutely nothing to do with the type of criminal justice system this nation has.
Regarding nicholsmom's statement:
We decide together - and that includes people of all religions who are citizens - what will and will not become law
I see, so Christians and Jews should work together with Muslims and atheists/secular humanists to decide which laws work best for our society?
WizardofOz
New member
Angry? Helping those less fortunate makes me happy!
It doesn't. That also wasn't the point of her words. She was addressing theocratic Christians and how they are in error.
See, unlike you, she knows her bible. Matthew 9:13
Yes. That's exactly right. Or, do you have a problem working with Jews?
Who said anything about barriers? We would already have the only barrier we need - the lack of a welfare state. That would do a better job of keeping lefties out than anything else I could think of.
This Charming Manc
Well-known member
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
(Aaron seems exceptionally angry tonight).
That negative rep that you gave me about a half hour ago didn't feel like it came from a happy person Aaron.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Why do you think that the woman who does your speaking for you used the word "mercy"? Mercy is only used in sentencing and has absolutely nothing to do with the type of criminal justice system this nation has.
Yet Matthew 9:13 has absolutely nothing to do with the righteous role of government in a Judeo-Christian based society, which the United States once was.
I think that the woman who does your speaking for you doesn't understand the difference between the role of civil government and eternal life through salvation.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Regarding nicholsmom's statement:
"We decide together - and that includes people of all religions who are citizens - what will and will not become law"
I see, so Christians and Jews should work together with Muslims and atheists/secular humanists to decide which laws work best for our society?
Hence my constant use of the term "Judeo-Christian doctrine".
BTW Aaron, how is secular humanist/atheist laws working out in our country when it comes to the rights of the unborn?
While you're at it, show us how well Muslims are working together with Christians and Jews to make our country a better place for all.
Here, let me help:
CAIR’s Islamists Eject Breitbart From Their Anti-Carson Press Conference
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...eject-breitbart-anti-carson-press-conference/
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
(Aaron seems exceptionally angry tonight).
That negative rep that you gave me about a half hour ago didn't feel like it came from a happy person Aaron.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Why do you think that the woman who does your speaking for you used the word "mercy"? Mercy is only used in sentencing and has absolutely nothing to do with the type of criminal justice system this nation has.
Yet Matthew 9:13 has absolutely nothing to do with the righteous role of government in a Judeo-Christian based society, which the United States once was.
I think that the woman who does your speaking for you doesn't understand the difference between the role of civil government and eternal life through salvation.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
Regarding nicholsmom's statement:
"We decide together - and that includes people of all religions who are citizens - what will and will not become law"
I see, so Christians and Jews should work together with Muslims and atheists/secular humanists to decide which laws work best for our society?
Hence my constant use of the term "Judeo-Christian doctrine".
BTW Aaron, how is secular humanist/atheist laws working out in our country when it comes to the rights of the unborn?
While you're at it, show us how well Muslims are working together with Christians and Jews to make our country a better place for all.
Here, let me help:
CAIR’s Islamists Eject Breitbart From Their Anti-Carson Press Conference
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...eject-breitbart-anti-carson-press-conference/