Muslim countries have a religious test

Nick M

Plymouth Colonist
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
I am quite aware of these facts. Yet that does not make "Islam is violation of the 1st amendment." a true statement.

Sure it does. Go ahead and post Islamic law that muslims want. Islam is a way of life, not just a religion based on child molesting false prophet.

If congress decided to make Islam the state religion in the US- that would violate the amendment.

Funny how the left gets the 1st amendment right when it suits them, but wrong when a student wants to use the school for Bible study after hours.



There is room for a history lesson here in how Christianity spread.

Just so you know, Pat Robertson is not a Christian.
 

chair

Well-known member
Sure it does. Go ahead and post Islamic law that muslims want. Islam is a way of life, not just a religion based on child molesting false prophet.

Funny how the left gets the 1st amendment right when it suits them, but wrong when a student wants to use the school for Bible study after hours.

Just so you know, Pat Robertson is not a Christian.

Read the first amendment. just read it.
 

CherubRam

New member
Turkey became Muslim over 500 years ago. This is not exactly a recent event.
The world was entirely, completely, totally non-Muslim 1,500 years ago.
And completely non-Christian 2,000 years ago.

Correct, and after four hundred years of war, Turkey became a Muslim nation.
 

CherubRam

New member
LOL. Educate yourself.

BKH-5708.jpg

:chuckle: Your posts are too much sometimes. I love it.
Have either of you studied Secret Societies?
 

Nick M

Plymouth Colonist
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
And what tiny fraction of American Muslims want that?

According to muslims, all of them. Not only that, but about 40%, or 400,000,000 of them support jihad. Those that don't support jihad don't because they support Iran, a sovereign government to do it. Not bin Laden.
 

chair

Well-known member
Let's try this again. Here is the Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

Now, if I was a Muslim, and believed that all people should be forced to become Muslim, I clearly would disagree with this amendment. The belief itself is not a "violation" of the constitution.

If I get a majority in congress to agree with my ideas, and they pass a law to make Islam the official religion of the USA, then congress will have violated the amendment.

On the other hand, if congress declares Islam, or any other religion, to be illegal in the USA- then that would violate the amendment: "...Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

The statement: "Islam is violation of the 1st amendment." is not true. You can say that "Islam is against the 1st amendment"- that would be true, at least for some forms of Islam.

It really is not that complicated.
 

bybee

New member
Let's try this again. Here is the Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

Now, if I was a Muslim, and believed that all people should be forced to become Muslim, I clearly would disagree with this amendment. The belief itself is not a "violation" of the constitution.

If I get a majority in congress to agree with my ideas, and they pass a law to make Islam the official religion of the USA, then congress will have violated the amendment.

On the other hand, if congress declares Islam, or any other religion, to be illegal in the USA- then that would violate the amendment: "...Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

The statement: "Islam is violation of the 1st amendment." is not true. You can say that "Islam is against the 1st amendment"- that would be true, at least for some forms of Islam.

It really is not that complicated.

To preach from the pulpit advocating and inciting the violent overthrow of our government is illegal. When that happens the religious edifice is no longer merely a religion but has become an illegal anti-government terrorist group. And MUST be dealt with accordingly.
 

chair

Well-known member
To preach from the pulpit advocating and inciting the violent overthrow of our government is illegal. When that happens the religious edifice is no longer merely a religion but has become an illegal anti-government terrorist group. And MUST be dealt with accordingly.

Yes. But "Islam is violation of the 1st amendment." remains a false statement.
 
Top