Moves in Michigan and California (!) to re-outlaw sodomy

[musterion]

ironically, most people don't care what people do in their bedrooms

if homos were willing to keep their disgusting perversions in their bedrooms, nobody would care

but no, they want to flaunt their perversions in public and in the classroom and demand societal acceptance

Yep. Can't stop what people do privately, whether we know about it or not. ACW equated that with "not caring what they do" but that's not true. Anyway, it is precisely the in-your-face part that is the problem. The Wife and I keep our thing "in the closet," i.e., out of the public eye. Nobody's business and it's tasteless to discuss. Queers refuse to abide that common sense notion. Case in point (this is your warning -- don't click):

Seriously, DO NOT CLICK.

http://www.zombietime.com/up_your_alley_2015/

 

[ok doser]

ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww


i clicked :vomit:

 

[musterion]

 

[Crucible]

 

[The Horn]

Crucible, how can you compare bestiality with consenting sex between two adults of the same sex in private ? Does this even make any sense ? Bestiality is just plain gross , disgusting and unsanitary . And sick. But NOT consenting sex between adults in private . This cannot and must not be the business of the police, the law and the courts .
Social conservatives are the worst busybodies on earth, not to mention the worst hypocrites . They scream about wanting "liberty ", "smaller government" and"limited government ", yet they pass laws against what consenting adults do in private .
The Michigan legislature should be worrying about contaminated water in Flint, not "sodomy ". Sheesh !

 

[ok doser]

Crucible, how can you compare bestiality with consenting sex between two adults of the same sex in private ?

easy

they're both perversions

 

[Crucible]

flint michigan protesters:
View attachment 23389

Is that Jesse Jackson?

That just made me care about the alleged problem a lot less, now that the race card is what is perpetuating it.

 

[Crucible]

Crucible, how can you compare bestiality with consenting sex between two adults of the same sex in private ? (...) Bestiality is just plain gross , disgusting and unsanitary . And sick.

^
Liberal logic


Are you even aware of what sodomy is :freak:

 

[musterion]

easy

they're both perversions

 

[The Horn]

Technically, sodomy is also non missionary position sex with HETEROSEXUALS , and many of them are "guilty" of this .
Animals cannot consent to sex with humans . But consenting sex between gay people is not , cannot and must NEVER be considered a crime of any kind . If you think it should be, YOU are the real pervert .

 

[Crucible]

Technically, sodomy is also non missionary position sex with HETEROSEXUALS , and many of them are "guilty" of this.
Animals cannot consent to sex with humans .

Sodomy is anal or oral intercourse by the legal definition. It is impossible for homosexuals to have intercourse without it being sodomy.

And
'Animals cannot consent' is the lamest argument on the opposing end. We kill and eat animals, and make slave labor of them.

But consenting sex between gay people is not , cannot and must NEVER be considered a crime of any kind . If you think it should be, YOU are the real pervert .

Cool story.

Just don't get in a time machine and tell it to anybody who has lived in the Common Era :rotfl:

It's only been legal for hardly thirty years.

 

[ok doser]

But consenting sex between gay people is not , cannot and must NEVER be considered a crime of any kind . If you think it should be, YOU are the real pervert .

View attachment 23395

 

[Nick M]

Crucible, how can you compare bestiality with consenting sex between two adults of the same sex gender

Because a man is not with his God designed companion. You idiot perverted liberals just want to put the square peg in the round hole.

 

[kmoney]

​

​

http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/02/m...odomy-a-felony-possibility-of-life-in-prison/

Am I against it in theory? Nope. Question is, who is behind it now, and what's their real motivation?

My first guess, since it's Michigan, was caliphate-minded Muslims. California, I had no idea. Still don't.

But apparently not Muslims. It appears to perhaps be some old style Rushdoonyite theonomists/reconstructionists/dominionists seeking to impose the Law of Moses upon all.

Too bad ACW ain't here to rejoice with his brothers in Michigan.

Is the crime against nature defined somewhere in that? I'm not seeing it.

 

[Crucible]

Because a man is not with his God designed companion. You idiot perverted liberals just want to put the square peg in the round hole.

They need a course in physiology, so maybe they will understand that anal intercourse and bestiality are on the same tier of filthiness. Separating them apart is just pulling the wool against reality.

And with God, yes- it is a complete violation of natural law. Most states that had a sodomy law also included it with heterosexuals as well, as sodomy is any form of sex not involving the appropriate way of conception, such as oral.

 

[The Horn]

Musterion, the DEMOCRATS have poisoned the water in Flint ? Are you nuts ? What proof do you have of this ?

 

[ok doser]

Musterion, the DEMOCRATS have poisoned the water in Flint ? Are you nuts ? What proof do you have of this ?

google

it's not just for kids anymore

Before the appointment of the (Democratic) emergency manager, Flint’s elected mayor and city council (Democrats) had decided to sever the city’s relationship with its drinking-water supplier, which was at the time the Detroit water authority. Flint intended to join a regional water authority that would pipe water in from Lake Huron, a project that was scheduled to take three years to come online. In a fit of pique, Detroit (a city under unitary Democratic control) immediately moved to terminate Flint’s water supply, leaving the city high and literally dry.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430072/flint-lead-water-scandal

 

[Arthur Brain]

They need a course in physiology, so maybe they will understand that anal intercourse and bestiality are on the same tier of filthiness. Separating them apart is just pulling the wool against reality.

And with God, yes- it is a complete violation of natural law. Most states that had a sodomy law also included it with heterosexuals as well, as sodomy is any form of sex not involving the appropriate way of conception, such as oral.

Well, most states it would seem have decided that what consenting adults do in the bedroom is nobody else's business, as it should be really.

 

[ok doser]

Well, most states it would seem have decided that what consenting adults do in the bedroom is nobody else's business, as it should be really.

because reasons

 

[Arthur Brain]

because reasons

Because what consenting adults do in their private life is neither the state's or anybody else's business. Pretty straightforward stuff.