Monday is Robert E. Lee day in Alabama.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
And the North didn't? Are you really this dense or are you really trying hard to work at it today?

Given a choice between the two, the Union was the better of the two causes. For me it comes down to the Cornerstone Speech. It's indefensible.
 

drbrumley

Well-known member
Given a choice between the two, the Union was the better of the two causes.

Now that is despicable. Alexander Stephens said correctly that slavery was more secure in the union than out of it because of the Fugitive Slave Clause, of which Lincoln strongly supported along with the Dred Scott decision.

For me it comes down to the Cornerstone Speech. It's indefensible.

There you have it folks. Sad indeed.
 

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
Now that is despicable. Alexander Stephens said correctly that slavery was more secure in the union than out of it because of the Fugitive Slave Clause, of which Lincoln strongly supported along with the Dred Scott decision.

When was the last time you read that speech?
 

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
Ok, what about that speech? Lincoln along with the leaders of the Republican Party, were in agreement with Stephens. Not sure what point your trying to make.

Lincoln's views on race at the very least evolved over time. To say he agreed with Stephens would be a mistake based on the facts.

If Stephens was correct, and if white supremacy was the cornerstone of the Confederacy, they most certainly were not occupiers of the moral high ground. Their cause was simply indefensible.
 

drbrumley

Well-known member
Lincoln's views on race at the very least evolved over time.

No it didn't.

To say he agreed with Stephens would be a mistake based on the facts.

Hardly!

If Stephens was correct, and if white supremacy was the cornerstone of the Confederacy, they most certainly were not occupiers of the moral high ground. Their cause was simply indefensible.

Didn't say they had the moral high ground. But your saying the North did. And based on the facts, that's incorrect. Lincoln held his racist views till the day he was killed.
 

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
No it didn't.

A stupefying response.

Didn't say they had the moral high ground. But your saying the North did.

Given a choice between the two, the Union was in a morally defensible position. The South wasn't.

And based on the facts, that's incorrect. Lincoln held his racist views till the day he was killed.

That simply isn't so. I think you know better.
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
A stupefying response.

He is right, it didnt, Lincoln wanted to free then deport them all to their own colonization, especially Liberia.

While it is true that Lincoln regarded slavery as an evil and harmful institution, it is also true, as this paper will show, that he shared the conviction of most Americans of his time, and of many prominent statesmen before and after him, that blacks could not be assimilated into white society. He rejected the notion of social equality of the races, and held to the view that blacks should be resettled abroad. As President, he supported projects to remove blacks from the United States.

The 'Great Emancipator' and the Issue of Race
Abraham Lincoln's Program of Black Resettlement



Given a choice between the two, the Union was in a morally defensible position. The South wasn't.

Then you believe the blacks should have been shippped out of the US in addition to the south paying higher taxes than others and not having any states rights?



That simply isn't so. I think you know better.
You have no idea what you are talking about on this issue, i suggest reading source documents and real history and even Lincolns own stances and statements on the issues, the paper i linked you to, is a very good start.
 

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
He is right, it didnt, Lincoln wanted to free then deport them all to their own colonization, especially Liberia.

He considered the idea, all right, but he--and everyone else--never really took it seriously.

Then you believe the blacks should have been shippped out of the US in addition to the south paying higher taxes than others and not having any states rights?

:yawn: Spare me.
 

Crowns&Laurels

BANNED
Banned
He sold out his country and committed high treason. There is nothing romantic about him, or what he fought for.

:doh: If it were England maybe. This is America; a civil war here is just aggressive negotiation.

"Treason" is an abused word. The Founding Fathers committed treason when we declared independence.
 

oatmeal

Well-known member
The issue boiled down to state's rights

The issue is relevant today

The government is to serve its citizens according to the Constitition, not the reverse
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
He considered the idea, all right, but he--and everyone else--never really took it seriously.

That is blatently false, loads of even our early fathers of this country, had spoken about the issue, including Thomas Jefferson who himself owned slaves, again check out what i linked you too, its a great place to start to learn actual history and has loads and loads of references you can also read.

:yawn: Spare me.

Remain ignorant, if that is what you wish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top