Apple7
New member
Are you saying the logos was in BOTH?
No.
Are you saying the logos was in BOTH?
Could it be possible that the logos is Mel?
Could it be possible that the logos is Mel?
Sent from my VS835 using Tapatalk
Not according to scripture.
Two separate Persons are in view.
But they are like each other. Jesus was given the logos, he is the only one recorded to receive it.
I think a look see on Mel is in order, could he be the logos? Was it Mel in Jesus???
Just thinking out loud.......
Peace
Heb 7.3 informs the reader that the Priest, Melchizedek, who is infinite and uncreated, was ‘made in the likeness’ of The Son of God, Jesus.
Likewise, Heb 7.15 declares that another Priest, Jesus, will arise according to ‘the likeness’ of Melchisedek.
Thus, if each Priest is in the likeness of the other, then each is infinite and uncreated.
Further, Just as Heb 7.15 - 16 declares that Jesus is according to the likeness of Melchizedek, and according to the ‘Power‘ of an indissoluble life; we then have Luke 1.35 informing the reader that this ‘Power’ is of the Holy Spirit!
Thus, we are told that The Holy Spirit assumed human form, just like The Son did!
And the angel answered and said to her, “ The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God. - Luke 1:35 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke1:35&version=NKJV
But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.”So all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying:“Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,” which is translated, “God with us.” - Matthew 1:20-23 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew1:20-23&version=NKJV
Its good to see you with your thinking cap on...
Welcome to The Second and Third Persons of The Trinity.
btw....what scripture informs you that Jesus was given the logos?
Again...you just presented the Three Persons of the Trinity....Father, Son, Holy Spirit.
What can you do now, Trev...?
Indeed, Melchizedek (The Holy Spirit) is a real Person.
Heb 7.3 informs the reader that the Priest, Melchizedek, who is infinite and uncreated, was ‘made in the likeness’ of The Son of God, Jesus.
Likewise, Heb 7.15 declares that another Priest, Jesus, will arise according to ‘the likeness’ of Melchisedek.
Thus, if each Priest is in the likeness of the other, then each is infinite and uncreated.
What can you do now, Trev...?
I hope your kidding, that does not make Jesus God.
Or the Holy Spirit either.
Proof by repeated assertion is a fallacy, Keypurr. You can disagree all you want. But that doesn't make you any more correct.Let it be noted that I disagree, as they re both creations.
Not really. Both were creations.
Proof by repeated assertion is a fallacy, Keypurr. You can disagree all you want. But that doesn't make you any more correct.
It's pretty clear that it does, Keypurr.
Or what, are you just going to reassert your position again as if nothing has been said?
But Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? While it remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not in your own control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God.” - Acts 5:3-4 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts5:3-4&version=NKJV
When Moses spoke the people considered he spoke for YHWH.
When Jesus spoke the people considered the words were from YHWH.
And we know the Holy Spirit comes from YHWH.
One of the biggest problems
with the Greek translations is they did not use the name of God.
It can cause a lot of confusion.
I personally do not see the Holy Spirit as God,
I see it as the power God uses to do his work.
The verses pertaining to this subject can be taken as you see it, but I do not hold the same view JR.
Peace
Proof by repeated assertion is a fallacy, Keypurr. You can disagree all you want. But that doesn't make you any more correct.
"All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made." (John 1:3)
Why don't you believe scripture?
Jesus isn't just speaking for God. He is God speaking.
But Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? While it remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not in your own control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God.” - Acts 5:3-4 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts5:3-4&version=NKJV
You mean, "one of Keypurr's biggest problems." Because it's not a problem for those who actually study God's word.
God is not the author of confusion.
The confusion comes when you don't know what the Greek actually says, or when you ignore the context of what is being said.
That's your problem, not the Bible's, which portrays the Holy Spirit as God. Don't believe me? look at the text I colored blue in this and my previous comment.
A power or force cannot be lied to or made angry.
Only a person can be lied to or made angry. The Person of the Holy Spirit is no different.
It doesn't matter what your view is. If it disagrees or doesn't line up with scripture, and yours clearly does, it's wrong.
No peace for those who reject the true nature of God.
I hope your kidding, that does not make Jesus God. Or the Holy Spirit either.