andyc
New member
Why wouldn't I believe they are in Heaven?
You do realize the Earthly Kingdom, when the New Jerusalem descends, is in the future, right?
Point me to where this is shown in scripture.
Good luck!
Why wouldn't I believe they are in Heaven?
You do realize the Earthly Kingdom, when the New Jerusalem descends, is in the future, right?
There is not one verse in the Bible that says the New Jerusalem descends to planet earth.
Rev 21:24 (KJV)
The Kings of the earth must be good high jumpers.
There is not one verse in the Bible that says the New Jerusalem descends to planet earth.
Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Rev 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband
Well....John is speaking about 'an' earth and 'a' heaven in verse one.
And...in verse two, he is saying that the New Jerusalem is 'coming down out of 'the' heaven, mentioned in verse one, to something.
Would it not be reasonable to conclude that it is coming down to the earth mentioned in verse one?
Why go to some other sense, if what it plainly says makes good sense?
If the old earth is a planet, then why can't the new earth be a planet?
The Kings of the earth must be good high jumpers.
Rev 21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
Rev 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband
Well....John is speaking about 'an' earth and 'a' heaven in verse one.
And...in verse two, he is saying that the New Jerusalem is 'coming down out of 'the' heaven, mentioned in verse one, to something.
Would it not be reasonable to conclude that it is coming down to the earth mentioned in verse one?
Why go to some other sense, if what it plainly says makes good sense?
If the old earth is a planet, then why can't the new earth be a planet?
First off, the "new heaven and new earth" is a refrence to the new covenant, not a literal new planet.
Second verse 1 says there will be no more "sea", yet Rev 22:1 says there is a river.
So, you guys can't have it both ways. If everything is taken literal, then you have a river with no sea, which can't happen.
For all those who think God will create a literal new planet earth:
Psalm 37:29
The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever.
Psalm 78:69
The earth which he hath established for ever.
Psalm 104:5
Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.
Ecclessiastes 1:4
One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.
For all those who think God will create a literal new planet earth:
Psalm 37:29
The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever.
Psalm 78:69
The earth which he hath established for ever.
Psalm 104:5
Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.
Ecclessiastes 1:4
One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.
For all those who think God will create a literal new planet earth:
Psalm 37:29
The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever.
Psalm 78:69
The earth which he hath established for ever.
Psalm 104:5
Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.
Ecclessiastes 1:4
One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.
That it's the new covenant? I never would have come to that conclusion on my own.
I don't think that enough information is given to determine what sea the reference is to. It could be the Mediteranean for all we know. It doesn't have to be referring to all the large bodies of water on earth, thus there can be a river.
Some simple observations will make your view problematic.
I saw a new heaven and a new earth
John Can't be saying that he saw the physical and spiritual realm at the same time, because this would not make sense.
And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband
Its quite obvious that there is symbolism here. How can a city be prepared as a bride?
Without a doubt John is describing the new Jerusalem that is the reward of the saints, the inheritance. It is impossible to explain a heavenly reward without using earthly imagery, and so the reward is explained in exaggerated natural ways to capture the imagination of the church.
Obviously John is saying that there is a whole new world, and there is a city descending from the sky (heaven) in this new world to the earth (ground).
For all those who think God will create a literal new planet earth:
Psalm 37:29
The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever.
Psalm 78:69
The earth which he hath established for ever.
Psalm 104:5
Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever.
Ecclessiastes 1:4
One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever.
I'm not sure. Peter did speak of the current universe as though it will be "burned up":
2 Peter 3:10
But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up.
2 Peter 3:12
Looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat.
Genesis 8:22 While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.
Revelation 7:16 They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat.
by G&P: True, but, when the word of God interprets the word of God, and you use the holy spirit to do so, you would come to that conclusion.