I don't trust a guy who doesn't have a sense of humor nor a quick WIT.
ECT MAD interp chaos #456: You can't be in the New Covenant
- Thread starter Interplanner
- Start date
Taters, bro...taters :chuckle:
andyc
New member
What I've been telling you is not based on charismatic reasoning. Read a different translation, and any commentary of your choice on the matter.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
yeah, hath God said?
andyc
New member
The bible said that John the baptist was filled with the Holy Spirit. Do you believe this?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Interplanner
Well-known member
Satanic-the devil child asserts that the gospel is the new covenant.
No scripture says that.
" it is obvious that it is the KJV that is in error"-candya
Translated: It is obvious that "fill in the blank of any translation/version" is wrong, since it does not support my satanic "doctrine." Thus, I, candya, will correct those versions/translations, so that it agrees with my "doctrine," as I am the final authority, not the bible.
Ssssssssssssssss..............Your daddy devil taught you well, loser.
That's rich, as this little punk, who would not know the difference between the book of Daniel, and Daniel Boone, weighs in on the KJB translators, who, objectively, were viewed even by most critics, as amongst the brightest, in terms of knowledge of Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic................?
Funny, candya.
Last edited:
"some Greek" and you/anyone are/is an expert? Chapter, verse, were the LORD God promised to preserve His word in any translation?
I thought so.
The original King James Bible has "spirit" the same in verse 3 and verse 6.
See for yourself HERE
So, which King James Bible are we to believe?
Who taught you that, weekling? You plagiarized that argument.
Define bible believer.
Watch the little arm punk punt that for the 100+ time.
Do you read(not believe) a bible made by human hands? Why do you say the word of God is looking after the flesh, since it is literal?
What's the problem, unemployed Craigie boy?
Which bible do you believe, and not correct, bible corrector?
How do you know that what you cited was "The original King James Bible?" Ever seen it? Touched it? Is it literal?
Someone changed the original first edition King James Bible.
Look again at the top of the page. The top of the page even says "Letter and Spirit", with "Spirit" having a capital "S". HERE
How do you decide which King James Bible to believe? The original first edition KJV with a capital "S", or the modern KJV with a small "s"?
Also, for those of us who don't have to defend Darby's false teachings (like you), it's really simple:
(2 Cor 3:17) Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
Who cares about lower case or capital S?
Who taught you that? Rhetorical q-want to see from which web site you obtained this satanic "argument," Craigie boy?
How do you know that the "originals" were/were not changed by "someone," Craigie boy?
He won't touch that.
How do you know that what you cited was "The original King James Bible?" Ever seen it? Touched it? Is it literal?
Fraud.
I just now googled Darby's translation and found that although his translation is also lower case; his commentary on the passage was that the new covenant was what was being referred to.
You are just being your same old slandering you.
You just might be right.
It is what was being talked about to begin with, when something else was mentioned within that, that reveals the intended sense or meaning of any word or phrase; not whether a word is spelled one way or another.
What was Paul talking about when he then said what he said?
He was talking about a heart issue.
The entire chapter is dealing with heart issues.
Which are often referred to as man's spirit in other passages. As in...
Psalms 34:18 The LORD is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a contrite spirit.